{"title":"认知现代主义导论","authors":"P. Armstrong","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2022.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This introductory essay examines the questions that recent cognitive approaches to reading and literature have raised about modern fiction’s so-called inward turn and reviews the ways in which the contributions to the issue respond to them. The plural Cognitive Modernisms in the issue’s title calls attention to the epistemological multiplicity of modernism’s cognitive turn. A unifying theme of the contributions, across their methodological and theoretical differences, is that a focus on cognitive processes, guided by scientific terms and concepts, can illuminate the epistemological, aesthetic, and social workings of style.","PeriodicalId":45576,"journal":{"name":"MFS-Modern Fiction Studies","volume":"60 1","pages":"601 - 618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Modernisms: An Introduction\",\"authors\":\"P. Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mfs.2022.0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This introductory essay examines the questions that recent cognitive approaches to reading and literature have raised about modern fiction’s so-called inward turn and reviews the ways in which the contributions to the issue respond to them. The plural Cognitive Modernisms in the issue’s title calls attention to the epistemological multiplicity of modernism’s cognitive turn. A unifying theme of the contributions, across their methodological and theoretical differences, is that a focus on cognitive processes, guided by scientific terms and concepts, can illuminate the epistemological, aesthetic, and social workings of style.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MFS-Modern Fiction Studies\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"601 - 618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MFS-Modern Fiction Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2022.0043\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MFS-Modern Fiction Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2022.0043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:This introductory essay examines the questions that recent cognitive approaches to reading and literature have raised about modern fiction’s so-called inward turn and reviews the ways in which the contributions to the issue respond to them. The plural Cognitive Modernisms in the issue’s title calls attention to the epistemological multiplicity of modernism’s cognitive turn. A unifying theme of the contributions, across their methodological and theoretical differences, is that a focus on cognitive processes, guided by scientific terms and concepts, can illuminate the epistemological, aesthetic, and social workings of style.
期刊介绍:
Modern Fiction Studies publishes engaging articles on prominent works of modern and contemporary fiction. Emphasizing historical, theoretical, and interdisciplinary approaches, the journal encourages a dialogue between fiction and theory, publishing work that offers new theoretical insights, clarity of style, and completeness of argument. Modern Fiction Studies alternates general issues dealing with a wide range of texts with special issues focused on single topics or individual writers.