扩展课程的在线学习模块:有用和利用?

Theresa M. Crimmins, Candice L. Rupprecht
{"title":"扩展课程的在线学习模块:有用和利用?","authors":"Theresa M. Crimmins,&nbsp;Candice L. Rupprecht","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2008.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A set of publicly available online learning modules was created as an educational supplement to a university extension program. Because the modules created for this program—like many online modules developed as a part of university outreach—are supplementary to programs featuring in-person instruction and hard-copy materials, it is not required that they be completed. An exploratory evaluation aimed to determine whether program participants make use of the non-compulsory modules and whether the modules are effective in helping participants to gain a greater understanding of watershed concepts. Such findings may extend to similar supplementary online learning experiences being developed through university extension and other similar programs. Participants in the evaluation demonstrated a &gt;30% increase in content knowledge from pre-test scores to post-test scores; 70% of participants retained this knowledge through a 2-month follow-up test. Participants also provided very positive feedback regarding their experience with the modules. Online usage statistics indicated sustained site visitation for many months following the modules’ release and advertisement. Modules were found to be an asset to the hard-copy text used for the extension course. Evaluators expressed appreciation for interactive learning objects and seemed to use the modules over time as a ready reference. However, the modules are clearly not a substitute for in-person instruction. Overall, the exploratory evaluation indicated that the modules were a welcome supplement to the course and were effective in reinforcing key concepts.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"39 1","pages":"102-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2008.0037","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Learning Modules for an Extension Program: Useful and Utilized?\",\"authors\":\"Theresa M. Crimmins,&nbsp;Candice L. Rupprecht\",\"doi\":\"10.4195/jnrlse.2008.0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A set of publicly available online learning modules was created as an educational supplement to a university extension program. Because the modules created for this program—like many online modules developed as a part of university outreach—are supplementary to programs featuring in-person instruction and hard-copy materials, it is not required that they be completed. An exploratory evaluation aimed to determine whether program participants make use of the non-compulsory modules and whether the modules are effective in helping participants to gain a greater understanding of watershed concepts. Such findings may extend to similar supplementary online learning experiences being developed through university extension and other similar programs. Participants in the evaluation demonstrated a &gt;30% increase in content knowledge from pre-test scores to post-test scores; 70% of participants retained this knowledge through a 2-month follow-up test. Participants also provided very positive feedback regarding their experience with the modules. Online usage statistics indicated sustained site visitation for many months following the modules’ release and advertisement. Modules were found to be an asset to the hard-copy text used for the extension course. Evaluators expressed appreciation for interactive learning objects and seemed to use the modules over time as a ready reference. However, the modules are clearly not a substitute for in-person instruction. Overall, the exploratory evaluation indicated that the modules were a welcome supplement to the course and were effective in reinforcing key concepts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"102-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2008.0037\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2008.0037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2008.0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

创建了一套公开可用的在线学习模块,作为大学扩展计划的教育补充。因为为这个项目创建的模块——就像许多作为大学拓展的一部分而开发的在线模块——是对以面对面教学和纸质材料为特色的项目的补充,所以不需要完成这些模块。一项探索性评估旨在确定项目参与者是否使用了非强制性模块,以及这些模块是否有效地帮助参与者更好地理解流域概念。这些发现可能会延伸到通过大学扩展和其他类似项目开发的类似补充在线学习体验。在评估中,参与者的内容知识从测试前的分数到测试后的分数增加了30%;通过两个月的随访测试,70%的参与者保留了这些知识。与会者还就他们使用模块的经验提供了非常积极的反馈。在线使用统计数据表明,在模块发布和广告之后,网站的访问量持续了好几个月。模块被发现是用于扩展课程的硬拷贝文本的资产。评估人员对互动式学习对象表示赞赏,并且似乎一直将这些模块作为现成的参考。然而,这些模块显然不能代替面对面的教学。总体而言,探索性评估表明,这些模块是课程的一个受欢迎的补充,并有效地强化了关键概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online Learning Modules for an Extension Program: Useful and Utilized?

A set of publicly available online learning modules was created as an educational supplement to a university extension program. Because the modules created for this program—like many online modules developed as a part of university outreach—are supplementary to programs featuring in-person instruction and hard-copy materials, it is not required that they be completed. An exploratory evaluation aimed to determine whether program participants make use of the non-compulsory modules and whether the modules are effective in helping participants to gain a greater understanding of watershed concepts. Such findings may extend to similar supplementary online learning experiences being developed through university extension and other similar programs. Participants in the evaluation demonstrated a >30% increase in content knowledge from pre-test scores to post-test scores; 70% of participants retained this knowledge through a 2-month follow-up test. Participants also provided very positive feedback regarding their experience with the modules. Online usage statistics indicated sustained site visitation for many months following the modules’ release and advertisement. Modules were found to be an asset to the hard-copy text used for the extension course. Evaluators expressed appreciation for interactive learning objects and seemed to use the modules over time as a ready reference. However, the modules are clearly not a substitute for in-person instruction. Overall, the exploratory evaluation indicated that the modules were a welcome supplement to the course and were effective in reinforcing key concepts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信