新冠肺炎再感染:新泽西州首例病例

S. Chandna, M. Shah, G. Aftab, A. Agrawal, D. Frenia
{"title":"新冠肺炎再感染:新泽西州首例病例","authors":"S. Chandna, M. Shah, G. Aftab, A. Agrawal, D. Frenia","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A4078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces an immune response but the degree and duration for which it provides protective immunity is still unknown. Herein we report a case of reinfection where the patient was tested positive again after being tested negative two subsequent times. Case DescriptionA 31-year-old Hispanic female with a past medical history of asthma, gastric sleeve surgery, and pulmonary embolism during pregnancy presented in March 2020 with subjective fever, dry cough, headache, and fatigue for 5 days. Vitals were significant for oxygen saturation of 96% on room air and BMI 44.4 kg/m2. Physical examination was normal. Labs and chest radiograph were normal. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was positive. The patient was discharged and was advised to quarantine herself and monitor her oxygen saturation. She was re-tested again in July 2020 and September 2020 and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was negative both times. The patient came to the hospital again in November 2020 with subjective fevers, chills, shortness of breath, body ache, and malaise for 1 week. Vitals were significant for a heart rate of 112/min, temperature 99.6 °F, respiratory rate of 20/min, hypoxia requiring 5L nasal cannula to maintain an oxygen saturation of 95%, and BMI 44.7 kg/m2. Physical exam revealed decreased air entry in the lungs bilaterally. Complete blood count and basic metabolic profile were within normal limits. Inflammatory markers were elevated. Computed tomography (CT) thorax showed bilateral, predominantly peripheral, and subpleural ill-defined ground-glass opacities consistent with pneumonia. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was positive. The patient was treated with intravenous remdesivir for 5 days and oral dexamethasone 6mg for 10 days. She improved clinically and was discharged on home oxygen. DiscussionAlthough the risk of COVID reinfection is low, cases of possible reinfection have been reported. Our patient was not immunocompromised, tested negative after 4 months and 6 months but presented again after 8 months with severe symptoms as compared to the first time. There have been case reports where the reinfection was more severe, however, there is not sufficient data to support that. There is not enough data demonstrating degree and duration of protection after the primary infection either. Reinfection could be due to infection with a more virulent strain or evolution of the previous viral strain in the body. The absence of genomic sequencing limits our ability to diagnose that. More research in this field and genomic sequencing can help us with an accurate diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":23169,"journal":{"name":"TP100. TP100 UNEXPECTED COVID-19 CASE REPORTS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID 19 Reinfection: First Case in New Jersey\",\"authors\":\"S. Chandna, M. Shah, G. Aftab, A. Agrawal, D. Frenia\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A4078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces an immune response but the degree and duration for which it provides protective immunity is still unknown. Herein we report a case of reinfection where the patient was tested positive again after being tested negative two subsequent times. Case DescriptionA 31-year-old Hispanic female with a past medical history of asthma, gastric sleeve surgery, and pulmonary embolism during pregnancy presented in March 2020 with subjective fever, dry cough, headache, and fatigue for 5 days. Vitals were significant for oxygen saturation of 96% on room air and BMI 44.4 kg/m2. Physical examination was normal. Labs and chest radiograph were normal. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was positive. The patient was discharged and was advised to quarantine herself and monitor her oxygen saturation. She was re-tested again in July 2020 and September 2020 and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was negative both times. The patient came to the hospital again in November 2020 with subjective fevers, chills, shortness of breath, body ache, and malaise for 1 week. Vitals were significant for a heart rate of 112/min, temperature 99.6 °F, respiratory rate of 20/min, hypoxia requiring 5L nasal cannula to maintain an oxygen saturation of 95%, and BMI 44.7 kg/m2. Physical exam revealed decreased air entry in the lungs bilaterally. Complete blood count and basic metabolic profile were within normal limits. Inflammatory markers were elevated. Computed tomography (CT) thorax showed bilateral, predominantly peripheral, and subpleural ill-defined ground-glass opacities consistent with pneumonia. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was positive. The patient was treated with intravenous remdesivir for 5 days and oral dexamethasone 6mg for 10 days. She improved clinically and was discharged on home oxygen. DiscussionAlthough the risk of COVID reinfection is low, cases of possible reinfection have been reported. Our patient was not immunocompromised, tested negative after 4 months and 6 months but presented again after 8 months with severe symptoms as compared to the first time. There have been case reports where the reinfection was more severe, however, there is not sufficient data to support that. There is not enough data demonstrating degree and duration of protection after the primary infection either. Reinfection could be due to infection with a more virulent strain or evolution of the previous viral strain in the body. The absence of genomic sequencing limits our ability to diagnose that. More research in this field and genomic sequencing can help us with an accurate diagnosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TP100. TP100 UNEXPECTED COVID-19 CASE REPORTS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TP100. TP100 UNEXPECTED COVID-19 CASE REPORTS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A4078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP100. TP100 UNEXPECTED COVID-19 CASE REPORTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A4078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)可诱导免疫应答,但其提供保护性免疫的程度和持续时间尚不清楚。在这里,我们报告一个再感染的情况下,病人被检测为阴性后,再次阳性两次随后的时间。病例描述:一名31岁西班牙裔女性,既往有哮喘、胃袖手术和妊娠期肺栓塞病史,于2020年3月出现主观性发热、干咳、头痛和疲劳5天。室内空气氧饱和度为96%,BMI为44.4 kg/m2。身体检查正常。化验和胸片检查正常。SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR阳性。该患者出院,并被建议自我隔离并监测其血氧饱和度。她于2020年7月和2020年9月再次接受检测,两次SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR均为阴性。患者于2020年11月再次来到医院,主观发热、寒战、呼吸急促、身体疼痛、不适持续1周。心率为112/min,体温为99.6°F,呼吸频率为20/min,缺氧需要5L鼻插管维持95%的氧饱和度,BMI为44.7 kg/m2。体格检查显示双侧肺部空气进入减少。全血细胞计数和基本代谢谱在正常范围内。炎症标志物升高。胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)显示双侧,主要是外周,胸膜下模糊的磨玻璃影,与肺炎一致。SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR阳性。静脉给予瑞德西韦5天,口服地塞米松6mg, 10天。临床好转,在家吸氧出院。尽管新冠肺炎再感染的风险很低,但仍有可能再感染的病例报告。我们的患者没有免疫功能低下,在4个月和6个月后检测呈阴性,但在8个月后再次出现,与第一次相比症状严重。有再感染更严重的病例报告,但是,没有足够的数据支持这一点。也没有足够的数据显示初次感染后的保护程度和持续时间。再次感染可能是由于感染了毒性更强的病毒株或体内先前病毒株的进化。基因组测序的缺失限制了我们诊断的能力。在这个领域进行更多的研究和基因组测序可以帮助我们做出准确的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID 19 Reinfection: First Case in New Jersey
IntroductionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces an immune response but the degree and duration for which it provides protective immunity is still unknown. Herein we report a case of reinfection where the patient was tested positive again after being tested negative two subsequent times. Case DescriptionA 31-year-old Hispanic female with a past medical history of asthma, gastric sleeve surgery, and pulmonary embolism during pregnancy presented in March 2020 with subjective fever, dry cough, headache, and fatigue for 5 days. Vitals were significant for oxygen saturation of 96% on room air and BMI 44.4 kg/m2. Physical examination was normal. Labs and chest radiograph were normal. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was positive. The patient was discharged and was advised to quarantine herself and monitor her oxygen saturation. She was re-tested again in July 2020 and September 2020 and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was negative both times. The patient came to the hospital again in November 2020 with subjective fevers, chills, shortness of breath, body ache, and malaise for 1 week. Vitals were significant for a heart rate of 112/min, temperature 99.6 °F, respiratory rate of 20/min, hypoxia requiring 5L nasal cannula to maintain an oxygen saturation of 95%, and BMI 44.7 kg/m2. Physical exam revealed decreased air entry in the lungs bilaterally. Complete blood count and basic metabolic profile were within normal limits. Inflammatory markers were elevated. Computed tomography (CT) thorax showed bilateral, predominantly peripheral, and subpleural ill-defined ground-glass opacities consistent with pneumonia. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was positive. The patient was treated with intravenous remdesivir for 5 days and oral dexamethasone 6mg for 10 days. She improved clinically and was discharged on home oxygen. DiscussionAlthough the risk of COVID reinfection is low, cases of possible reinfection have been reported. Our patient was not immunocompromised, tested negative after 4 months and 6 months but presented again after 8 months with severe symptoms as compared to the first time. There have been case reports where the reinfection was more severe, however, there is not sufficient data to support that. There is not enough data demonstrating degree and duration of protection after the primary infection either. Reinfection could be due to infection with a more virulent strain or evolution of the previous viral strain in the body. The absence of genomic sequencing limits our ability to diagnose that. More research in this field and genomic sequencing can help us with an accurate diagnosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信