虚拟现实环境中不同运动技术的主观评价

Sara Vlahovic, M. Sužnjević, Lea Skorin-Kapov
{"title":"虚拟现实环境中不同运动技术的主观评价","authors":"Sara Vlahovic, M. Sužnjević, Lea Skorin-Kapov","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of a subjective study aimed at assessing different locomotion (may also be referred to as navigation) techniques in virtual reality environments. We implemented a simple virtual environment in which participants were asked to assess the following four techniques using the HTC Vive platform: teleportation, controller movement, controller movement with tunneling vision, and human joystick. A total of 29 participants took part in the study and rated perceived level of immersion, physical discomfort, and overall Quality of Experience for all tested locomotion techniques. Moreover, participants indicated whether they needed a break after a specific test due to physical discomfort. The results indicate that teleportation yields overall highest QoE and lowest discomfort.","PeriodicalId":6618,"journal":{"name":"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"99 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective Assessment of Different Locomotion Techniques in Virtual Reality Environments\",\"authors\":\"Sara Vlahovic, M. Sužnjević, Lea Skorin-Kapov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the results of a subjective study aimed at assessing different locomotion (may also be referred to as navigation) techniques in virtual reality environments. We implemented a simple virtual environment in which participants were asked to assess the following four techniques using the HTC Vive platform: teleportation, controller movement, controller movement with tunneling vision, and human joystick. A total of 29 participants took part in the study and rated perceived level of immersion, physical discomfort, and overall Quality of Experience for all tested locomotion techniques. Moreover, participants indicated whether they needed a break after a specific test due to physical discomfort. The results indicate that teleportation yields overall highest QoE and lowest discomfort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

本文介绍了一项主观研究的结果,旨在评估虚拟现实环境中不同的运动(也可以称为导航)技术。我们实现了一个简单的虚拟环境,在这个环境中,参与者被要求使用HTC Vive平台评估以下四种技术:瞬间移动、控制器移动、带隧道视觉的控制器移动和人类操纵杆。共有29名参与者参加了这项研究,并对所有测试的运动技术的沉浸感、身体不适和整体体验质量进行了评分。此外,参与者还指出,由于身体不适,他们是否需要在特定测试后休息一下。结果表明,隐形传态总体上产生最高的QoE和最低的不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subjective Assessment of Different Locomotion Techniques in Virtual Reality Environments
This paper presents the results of a subjective study aimed at assessing different locomotion (may also be referred to as navigation) techniques in virtual reality environments. We implemented a simple virtual environment in which participants were asked to assess the following four techniques using the HTC Vive platform: teleportation, controller movement, controller movement with tunneling vision, and human joystick. A total of 29 participants took part in the study and rated perceived level of immersion, physical discomfort, and overall Quality of Experience for all tested locomotion techniques. Moreover, participants indicated whether they needed a break after a specific test due to physical discomfort. The results indicate that teleportation yields overall highest QoE and lowest discomfort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信