共同创造健康:引导健康协作设计

I. Nakarada-Kordic, N. Kayes, S. Reay, J. Wrapson, G. Collier
{"title":"共同创造健康:引导健康协作设计","authors":"I. Nakarada-Kordic, N. Kayes, S. Reay, J. Wrapson, G. Collier","doi":"10.1080/24735132.2020.1800982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We drew on the principles of co-autoethnography to explore the experiences of two multidisciplinary university-based teams engaged in design for health work: (1) a design team embedded in a hospital consisting of designers and social researchers; and (2) a person-centred rehabilitation research team of health researchers and professionals. We explored ‘how might our experience of working in design for health inform how we work more effectively together?’ Written reflections provided by contributors from each team and a transcript of a group discussion were analysed drawing on conventional content analysis. We identified that design for health collaborations are often surrounded by substantial challenges and tensions that are perpetuated through: (1) A clash of worlds and disciplines; and (2) Constraining systems and structures. A shared sense of excitement, hope, and passion for the possibility that a design for health collaboration brings were also identified, as was the need for risk-taking. This work will have practical utility for those commencing work in this complex, transdisciplinary space. We propose successful design for health collaborations are conditional on three core processes: (1) Understanding psychosocial contexts; (2) Building connectivity; and (3) Building capability. These should be enacted through collaborative discussion at the initiation of each new collaborative project.","PeriodicalId":92348,"journal":{"name":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","volume":"43 1","pages":"213 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creating health: navigating a design for health collaboration\",\"authors\":\"I. Nakarada-Kordic, N. Kayes, S. Reay, J. Wrapson, G. Collier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24735132.2020.1800982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We drew on the principles of co-autoethnography to explore the experiences of two multidisciplinary university-based teams engaged in design for health work: (1) a design team embedded in a hospital consisting of designers and social researchers; and (2) a person-centred rehabilitation research team of health researchers and professionals. We explored ‘how might our experience of working in design for health inform how we work more effectively together?’ Written reflections provided by contributors from each team and a transcript of a group discussion were analysed drawing on conventional content analysis. We identified that design for health collaborations are often surrounded by substantial challenges and tensions that are perpetuated through: (1) A clash of worlds and disciplines; and (2) Constraining systems and structures. A shared sense of excitement, hope, and passion for the possibility that a design for health collaboration brings were also identified, as was the need for risk-taking. This work will have practical utility for those commencing work in this complex, transdisciplinary space. We propose successful design for health collaborations are conditional on three core processes: (1) Understanding psychosocial contexts; (2) Building connectivity; and (3) Building capability. These should be enacted through collaborative discussion at the initiation of each new collaborative project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design for health (Abingdon, England)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"213 - 230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design for health (Abingdon, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2020.1800982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2020.1800982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要:本研究利用共同自人种志的原则,探讨了两个以大学为基础的多学科设计团队从事卫生工作的经验:(1)一个由设计师和社会研究人员组成的嵌入医院的设计团队;(2)由卫生研究人员和专业人员组成的以人为本的康复研究团队。我们探讨了“我们在健康设计方面的工作经验如何能让我们更有效地合作?”根据传统的内容分析,对每个小组的撰稿人提供的书面反思和小组讨论的文字记录进行了分析。我们发现,卫生合作的设计常常被巨大的挑战和紧张局势所包围,这些挑战和紧张局势通过以下方式持续存在:(1)世界和学科的冲突;(2)约束制度和结构。还确定了对卫生合作设计带来的可能性的共同兴奋、希望和热情,以及冒险的必要性。这项工作将对那些在这个复杂的、跨学科的领域开始工作的人有实际的效用。我们提出,卫生合作的成功设计取决于三个核心过程:(1)理解社会心理背景;(2)建设互联互通;(3)建设能力。这些应该在每个新的合作项目启动时通过协作讨论制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-creating health: navigating a design for health collaboration
Abstract We drew on the principles of co-autoethnography to explore the experiences of two multidisciplinary university-based teams engaged in design for health work: (1) a design team embedded in a hospital consisting of designers and social researchers; and (2) a person-centred rehabilitation research team of health researchers and professionals. We explored ‘how might our experience of working in design for health inform how we work more effectively together?’ Written reflections provided by contributors from each team and a transcript of a group discussion were analysed drawing on conventional content analysis. We identified that design for health collaborations are often surrounded by substantial challenges and tensions that are perpetuated through: (1) A clash of worlds and disciplines; and (2) Constraining systems and structures. A shared sense of excitement, hope, and passion for the possibility that a design for health collaboration brings were also identified, as was the need for risk-taking. This work will have practical utility for those commencing work in this complex, transdisciplinary space. We propose successful design for health collaborations are conditional on three core processes: (1) Understanding psychosocial contexts; (2) Building connectivity; and (3) Building capability. These should be enacted through collaborative discussion at the initiation of each new collaborative project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信