罗伯特·萨格登《优势共同体》评论讨论会简介

IF 1.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
J. Vromen, N. Emrah Aydinonat
{"title":"罗伯特·萨格登《优势共同体》评论讨论会简介","authors":"J. Vromen, N. Emrah Aydinonat","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2021.1998755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The publication of Robert Sugden’s The Community of Advantage in 2018 might very well turn out to be a landmark event in welfare economics. In the book, Sugden presents a highly original view on what the main lessons of behavioral economics should be for welfare analyses; a view that radically deviates from the libertarian paternalism underlying the Nudge literature and other views that have been put forward in behavioral welfare economics. All the prevailing versions of behavioral welfare economics somehow want to retain the normative authority of individuals’ preferences (or of a proper subset of individuals’ preferences; preferences that are not clearly flawed by cognitive errors and mistakes). As Sugden cogently argues, the evidence gathered in behavioral economics fails to sustain this deference to preferences. With his own opportunity criterion, Sugden proposes a break with this long-lived tradition in welfare economics. The radicality of Sugden’s view goes beyond this as he argues that the addressee of welfare analysis should not be a fictitious benevolent social planner, but rather citizens, as potential parties to mutually beneficial agreements. We are happy to present this Review Symposium issue on The Community of Advantage in which prominent scholars, all with different outlooks and predilections, comment on the book, prompting Sugden to clarify and sharpen his own views. We want to thank Douglas Bernheim, Geoffrey Brennan, Malte Dold, Hartmut Kliemt, Mozaffar Quizilbash, Mario Rizzo, Cass Sunstein, Johanna Thoma and Robert Sugden for their fine work. Many thanks also to our reviewers for their contribution. Our greatest gratitude goes to Constanze Binder, the guest editor of this Review Symposium. Without her relentless efforts, this issue would not have seen the light. What is more, Constanze’s meticulous comments on earlier drafts of the articles published in this issue surely helped in improving their focus and clarity. Sadly, personal circumstances prevented her from finishing her own contribution in time. We hope that she will publish her own contribution soon and shed her own light on The Community of Advantage.","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":"75 1","pages":"349 - 349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the Review Symposium on Robert Sugden's The Community of Advantage\",\"authors\":\"J. Vromen, N. Emrah Aydinonat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1350178x.2021.1998755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The publication of Robert Sugden’s The Community of Advantage in 2018 might very well turn out to be a landmark event in welfare economics. In the book, Sugden presents a highly original view on what the main lessons of behavioral economics should be for welfare analyses; a view that radically deviates from the libertarian paternalism underlying the Nudge literature and other views that have been put forward in behavioral welfare economics. All the prevailing versions of behavioral welfare economics somehow want to retain the normative authority of individuals’ preferences (or of a proper subset of individuals’ preferences; preferences that are not clearly flawed by cognitive errors and mistakes). As Sugden cogently argues, the evidence gathered in behavioral economics fails to sustain this deference to preferences. With his own opportunity criterion, Sugden proposes a break with this long-lived tradition in welfare economics. The radicality of Sugden’s view goes beyond this as he argues that the addressee of welfare analysis should not be a fictitious benevolent social planner, but rather citizens, as potential parties to mutually beneficial agreements. We are happy to present this Review Symposium issue on The Community of Advantage in which prominent scholars, all with different outlooks and predilections, comment on the book, prompting Sugden to clarify and sharpen his own views. We want to thank Douglas Bernheim, Geoffrey Brennan, Malte Dold, Hartmut Kliemt, Mozaffar Quizilbash, Mario Rizzo, Cass Sunstein, Johanna Thoma and Robert Sugden for their fine work. Many thanks also to our reviewers for their contribution. Our greatest gratitude goes to Constanze Binder, the guest editor of this Review Symposium. Without her relentless efforts, this issue would not have seen the light. What is more, Constanze’s meticulous comments on earlier drafts of the articles published in this issue surely helped in improving their focus and clarity. Sadly, personal circumstances prevented her from finishing her own contribution in time. We hope that she will publish her own contribution soon and shed her own light on The Community of Advantage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Methodology\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"349 - 349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2021.1998755\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2021.1998755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

罗伯特·苏登(Robert Sugden)在2018年出版的《优势共同体》(The Community of Advantage)很可能成为福利经济学的一个里程碑事件。在书中,苏登提出了一个非常原创的观点,即行为经济学的主要教训应该用于福利分析;这种观点从根本上背离了《助推》(Nudge)文学和行为福利经济学中提出的其他观点所隐含的自由意志主义家长式作风。所有流行的行为福利经济学版本都想保留个人偏好(或个人偏好的适当子集)的规范性权威;没有明显的认知错误和错误的偏好)。正如萨格登令人信服地指出的那样,行为经济学中收集到的证据无法支持这种对偏好的服从。根据他自己的机会标准,萨格登提出要打破福利经济学中这种长期存在的传统。萨格登观点的激进之处在于,他认为福利分析的对象不应该是一个虚构的仁慈的社会规划者,而应该是公民,作为互惠协议的潜在各方。我们很高兴在《优势共同体》的评论研讨会上发表这期文章,在这期文章中,有着不同观点和偏好的著名学者对这本书进行了评论,这促使苏登澄清并阐明了他自己的观点。我们要感谢道格拉斯·伯恩海姆、杰弗里·布伦南、马尔特·多尔德、哈特穆特·克里姆特、莫扎法·奎兹尔巴什、马里奥·里佐、卡斯·桑斯坦、约翰娜·托马和罗伯特·萨格登的出色工作。也非常感谢我们的审稿人的贡献。我们非常感谢本次评论研讨会的客座编辑Constanze Binder。没有她不懈的努力,这个问题就不会曝光。更重要的是,Constanze对本期发表的文章的早期草稿进行了细致的评论,这无疑有助于提高文章的重点和清晰度。不幸的是,个人情况使她未能及时完成自己的贡献。我们希望她能尽快发表自己的贡献,为优势社区提供自己的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to the Review Symposium on Robert Sugden's The Community of Advantage
The publication of Robert Sugden’s The Community of Advantage in 2018 might very well turn out to be a landmark event in welfare economics. In the book, Sugden presents a highly original view on what the main lessons of behavioral economics should be for welfare analyses; a view that radically deviates from the libertarian paternalism underlying the Nudge literature and other views that have been put forward in behavioral welfare economics. All the prevailing versions of behavioral welfare economics somehow want to retain the normative authority of individuals’ preferences (or of a proper subset of individuals’ preferences; preferences that are not clearly flawed by cognitive errors and mistakes). As Sugden cogently argues, the evidence gathered in behavioral economics fails to sustain this deference to preferences. With his own opportunity criterion, Sugden proposes a break with this long-lived tradition in welfare economics. The radicality of Sugden’s view goes beyond this as he argues that the addressee of welfare analysis should not be a fictitious benevolent social planner, but rather citizens, as potential parties to mutually beneficial agreements. We are happy to present this Review Symposium issue on The Community of Advantage in which prominent scholars, all with different outlooks and predilections, comment on the book, prompting Sugden to clarify and sharpen his own views. We want to thank Douglas Bernheim, Geoffrey Brennan, Malte Dold, Hartmut Kliemt, Mozaffar Quizilbash, Mario Rizzo, Cass Sunstein, Johanna Thoma and Robert Sugden for their fine work. Many thanks also to our reviewers for their contribution. Our greatest gratitude goes to Constanze Binder, the guest editor of this Review Symposium. Without her relentless efforts, this issue would not have seen the light. What is more, Constanze’s meticulous comments on earlier drafts of the articles published in this issue surely helped in improving their focus and clarity. Sadly, personal circumstances prevented her from finishing her own contribution in time. We hope that she will publish her own contribution soon and shed her own light on The Community of Advantage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Methodology is a valuable forum which publishes the most current and exciting work in the broad field of economic methodology. The Journal of Economic Methodology addresses issues such as: ■Methodological analysis of the theory and practice of contemporary economics ■Analysis of the methodological implications of new developments in economic theory and practice ■The methodological writings and practice of earlier economic theorists (mainstream or heterodox) ■Research in the philosophical foundations of economics ■Studies in the rhetoric, sociology, or economics of economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信