不同运动方式治疗上交叉综合征的疗效观察

IF 0.6 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
C. Gera, S. Lamba, A. Pawalia, U. Panihar
{"title":"不同运动方式治疗上交叉综合征的疗效观察","authors":"C. Gera, S. Lamba, A. Pawalia, U. Panihar","doi":"10.3920/cep220039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Upper crossed syndrome (UCS) is characterised by distortion or imbalances of various muscles that put tension on the nearby tendons, bones, and joints leads to muscle weakness, tiredness, sore shoulder blades, headache and limitation of movements. The rationale of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of various exercises (McKenzie and TheraBand exercises) on posture, pain and strength in patients suffering with upper crossed syndrome. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (McKenzie group, n=15) and Group 2 (exercise group, n=15). Outcome measures were pain and disability using SPADI questionnaire and muscle strength using manual muscle testing. Group I received McKenzie exercises for 3 weeks, 5 sessions per week, whereas Group II received TheraBand exercises for 3 weeks, 5 sessions per week. Data analysis was done by using paired t-test for within group comparison and unrelated t-test to evaluate the between group differences in each outcome variable. The results indicated a statistically significant improvement in pre-/post values of pain & disability in the McKenzie group (t=7.60 and P=0.0001), and in the exercise group (t=8.25 and P=0.0001). Results also suggested a statistically significant improvement in the strength of serratus anterior (t=4.52 and P=0.0001), cervical flexors (t=4.12 and P=0.001), and rhomboids (t=4.14 and P=0.001) in the McKenzie group and strength of serratus anterior (t=5.17 and P=0.0001), cervical flexors (t=4.18 and P=0.001), rhomboids (t=4.18 and P=0.001) in the exercise group. Results indicated that the exercise group showed better improvement as compared to McKenzie group in terms of pain and disability. Results also stated that both groups were equally effective in improving muscle strength.","PeriodicalId":10709,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Exercise Physiology","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of various exercises in the management of upper crossed syndrome\",\"authors\":\"C. Gera, S. Lamba, A. Pawalia, U. Panihar\",\"doi\":\"10.3920/cep220039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Upper crossed syndrome (UCS) is characterised by distortion or imbalances of various muscles that put tension on the nearby tendons, bones, and joints leads to muscle weakness, tiredness, sore shoulder blades, headache and limitation of movements. The rationale of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of various exercises (McKenzie and TheraBand exercises) on posture, pain and strength in patients suffering with upper crossed syndrome. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (McKenzie group, n=15) and Group 2 (exercise group, n=15). Outcome measures were pain and disability using SPADI questionnaire and muscle strength using manual muscle testing. Group I received McKenzie exercises for 3 weeks, 5 sessions per week, whereas Group II received TheraBand exercises for 3 weeks, 5 sessions per week. Data analysis was done by using paired t-test for within group comparison and unrelated t-test to evaluate the between group differences in each outcome variable. The results indicated a statistically significant improvement in pre-/post values of pain & disability in the McKenzie group (t=7.60 and P=0.0001), and in the exercise group (t=8.25 and P=0.0001). Results also suggested a statistically significant improvement in the strength of serratus anterior (t=4.52 and P=0.0001), cervical flexors (t=4.12 and P=0.001), and rhomboids (t=4.14 and P=0.001) in the McKenzie group and strength of serratus anterior (t=5.17 and P=0.0001), cervical flexors (t=4.18 and P=0.001), rhomboids (t=4.18 and P=0.001) in the exercise group. Results indicated that the exercise group showed better improvement as compared to McKenzie group in terms of pain and disability. Results also stated that both groups were equally effective in improving muscle strength.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Exercise Physiology\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Exercise Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3920/cep220039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Exercise Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/cep220039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上肢交叉综合征(UCS)的特征是各种肌肉的扭曲或不平衡,使附近的肌腱、骨骼和关节紧张,导致肌肉无力、疲劳、肩胛骨疼痛、头痛和活动受限。本研究的基本原理是评估各种运动(McKenzie和TheraBand运动)对上肢交叉综合征患者的姿势、疼痛和力量的影响。参与者被随机分为两组:第一组(麦肯齐组,n=15)和第二组(运动组,n=15)。结果测量疼痛和残疾使用SPADI问卷和肌肉力量使用手动肌肉测试。第一组接受麦肯齐运动,为期3周,每周5次;第二组接受TheraBand运动,为期3周,每周5次。数据分析采用配对t检验进行组内比较,不相关t检验评估各结局变量组间差异。结果显示,McKenzie组(t=7.60, P=0.0001)和运动组(t=8.25, P=0.0001)的疼痛和残疾前后值均有统计学意义上的改善。结果还显示,McKenzie组前锯肌(t=4.52, P=0.0001)、颈屈肌(t=4.12, P=0.001)、菱形肌(t=4.14, P=0.001)的强度和运动组前锯肌(t=5.17, P=0.0001)、颈屈肌(t=4.18, P=0.001)、菱形肌(t=4.18, P=0.001)的强度均有统计学意义的改善。结果表明,与麦肯齐组相比,运动组在疼痛和残疾方面表现出更好的改善。结果还表明,两组在提高肌肉力量方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of various exercises in the management of upper crossed syndrome
Upper crossed syndrome (UCS) is characterised by distortion or imbalances of various muscles that put tension on the nearby tendons, bones, and joints leads to muscle weakness, tiredness, sore shoulder blades, headache and limitation of movements. The rationale of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of various exercises (McKenzie and TheraBand exercises) on posture, pain and strength in patients suffering with upper crossed syndrome. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (McKenzie group, n=15) and Group 2 (exercise group, n=15). Outcome measures were pain and disability using SPADI questionnaire and muscle strength using manual muscle testing. Group I received McKenzie exercises for 3 weeks, 5 sessions per week, whereas Group II received TheraBand exercises for 3 weeks, 5 sessions per week. Data analysis was done by using paired t-test for within group comparison and unrelated t-test to evaluate the between group differences in each outcome variable. The results indicated a statistically significant improvement in pre-/post values of pain & disability in the McKenzie group (t=7.60 and P=0.0001), and in the exercise group (t=8.25 and P=0.0001). Results also suggested a statistically significant improvement in the strength of serratus anterior (t=4.52 and P=0.0001), cervical flexors (t=4.12 and P=0.001), and rhomboids (t=4.14 and P=0.001) in the McKenzie group and strength of serratus anterior (t=5.17 and P=0.0001), cervical flexors (t=4.18 and P=0.001), rhomboids (t=4.18 and P=0.001) in the exercise group. Results indicated that the exercise group showed better improvement as compared to McKenzie group in terms of pain and disability. Results also stated that both groups were equally effective in improving muscle strength.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Exercise Physiology
Comparative Exercise Physiology VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: ''Comparative Exercise Physiology'' is the only international peer-reviewed scientific journal specifically dealing with the latest research in exercise physiology across all animal species, including humans. The major objective of the journal is to use this comparative approach to better understand the physiological, nutritional, and biochemical parameters that determine levels of performance and athletic achievement. Core subjects include exercise physiology, biomechanics, gait (including the effect of riders in equestrian sport), nutrition and biochemistry, injury and rehabilitation, psychology and behaviour, and breeding and genetics. This comparative and integrative approach to exercise science ultimately highlights the similarities as well as the differences between humans, horses, dogs, and other athletic or non-athletic species during exercise. The result is a unique forum for new information that serves as a resource for all who want to understand the physiological challenges with exercise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信