狭小的空间:在1971年阿提卡监狱起义中发现固定资本的反叛潜力

IF 0.2 4区社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES

Cultural Critique Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1353/cul.2023.0027

K. Siegfried

{"title":"狭小的空间:在1971年阿提卡监狱起义中发现固定资本的反叛潜力","authors":"K. Siegfried","doi":"10.1353/cul.2023.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this essay, I argue that social movements should appropriate fixed capital in moments of rebellion, utilizing it to halt capitalist production. Through this process, struggles over, for, and through fixed capital enable the prefiguring of new modes of (re)production, raising the fundamental political question of who governs the infrastructures at hand. I turn to the Attica Prison uprising of 1971 as an example of dispossessed people utilizing fixed capital to interrupt the continuation of an exploitative prison system. Finally, I offer an assessment of how explicit engagement with fixed capital and other material objects or built environments clarifies the ways that antagonistic compositional power might irreversibly damage the logics of capture within and against which rebellious potential emerges.","PeriodicalId":46410,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Critique","volume":"42 1","pages":"113 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cramped Space: Finding Rebellious Potential in Fixed Capital During the Attica Prison Uprising of 1971\",\"authors\":\"K. Siegfried\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cul.2023.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In this essay, I argue that social movements should appropriate fixed capital in moments of rebellion, utilizing it to halt capitalist production. Through this process, struggles over, for, and through fixed capital enable the prefiguring of new modes of (re)production, raising the fundamental political question of who governs the infrastructures at hand. I turn to the Attica Prison uprising of 1971 as an example of dispossessed people utilizing fixed capital to interrupt the continuation of an exploitative prison system. Finally, I offer an assessment of how explicit engagement with fixed capital and other material objects or built environments clarifies the ways that antagonistic compositional power might irreversibly damage the logics of capture within and against which rebellious potential emerges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Critique\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2023.0027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Critique","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2023.0027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:在这篇文章中，我认为社会运动应该在反抗的时刻占有固定资本，利用它来停止资本主义生产。通过这一过程，争夺、争取和通过固定资本的斗争使新的(再)生产模式得以预见，提出了谁管理手头基础设施的基本政治问题。我以1971年的阿提卡监狱起义为例，这是一个被剥夺财产的人利用固定资本来中断剥削监狱系统的延续的例子。最后，我对与固定资本和其他物质对象或建筑环境的明确接触如何阐明对抗性组成力量可能不可逆转地破坏捕获逻辑的方式进行了评估，并反对反叛潜力的出现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Cramped Space: Finding Rebellious Potential in Fixed Capital During the Attica Prison Uprising of 1971

Abstract:In this essay, I argue that social movements should appropriate fixed capital in moments of rebellion, utilizing it to halt capitalist production. Through this process, struggles over, for, and through fixed capital enable the prefiguring of new modes of (re)production, raising the fundamental political question of who governs the infrastructures at hand. I turn to the Attica Prison uprising of 1971 as an example of dispossessed people utilizing fixed capital to interrupt the continuation of an exploitative prison system. Finally, I offer an assessment of how explicit engagement with fixed capital and other material objects or built environments clarifies the ways that antagonistic compositional power might irreversibly damage the logics of capture within and against which rebellious potential emerges.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cultural Critique Multiple-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Cultural Critique provides a forum for international and interdisciplinary explorations of intellectual controversies, trends, and issues in culture, theory, and politics. Emphasizing critique rather than criticism, the journal draws on the diverse and conflictual approaches of Marxism, feminism, psychoanalysis, semiotics, political economy, and hermeneutics to offer readings in society and its transformation.