前哨淋巴结活检阳性-我们能预测哪些患者将从进一步手术中受益吗?

I. Dash, D. Egbeare, M. Straiton, K. Schwodler, G. Taylor, D. Goddard, J. Mcintosh, R. Sutton
{"title":"前哨淋巴结活检阳性-我们能预测哪些患者将从进一步手术中受益吗?","authors":"I. Dash, D. Egbeare, M. Straiton, K. Schwodler, G. Taylor, D. Goddard, J. Mcintosh, R. Sutton","doi":"10.14312/2052-4994.2015-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the gold standard for clinical and radiological negative axillae in breast cancer, the subsequent management of positive nodes is currently under scrutiny with the Z0011 trial publication causing much debate. Our aim was to determine whether there were any predictive factors in our cohort of patients that could assist in the decision of whether the patient required a further axillary lymph node clearance. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent SLNB and their histology was performed. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify any predictive factors. Results: Our Breast Unit performed 457 SLNB over the three years. The mean age of patients was 61.9 years (range 31-89 years). Of these 457 SLNB, 122 (26.7%) were positive for metastatic involvement, and of these patients only 34% were found to have further lymph node involvement after axillary lymph node clearance (ALNC). Only 8% of our total patient cohort had non sentinel node involvement at completion ALNC. Using univariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (p0.009), grade (p0.007) and size (p0.006) were all significant predictors for having a positive ALNC. Conclusion: Only 8% of the total number of patients had an additional positive lymph node found in their completion axillary clearance. Our results add to this existing knowledge on the subject, and show that there are certain factors which should be carefully considered pre-operatively in order to help inform patient and surgeon choice regarding management of the axilla.","PeriodicalId":90205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","volume":"109 1","pages":"15-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The positive sentinel lymph node biopsy- can we predict which patients will benefit from further surgery?\",\"authors\":\"I. Dash, D. Egbeare, M. Straiton, K. Schwodler, G. Taylor, D. Goddard, J. Mcintosh, R. Sutton\",\"doi\":\"10.14312/2052-4994.2015-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the gold standard for clinical and radiological negative axillae in breast cancer, the subsequent management of positive nodes is currently under scrutiny with the Z0011 trial publication causing much debate. Our aim was to determine whether there were any predictive factors in our cohort of patients that could assist in the decision of whether the patient required a further axillary lymph node clearance. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent SLNB and their histology was performed. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify any predictive factors. Results: Our Breast Unit performed 457 SLNB over the three years. The mean age of patients was 61.9 years (range 31-89 years). Of these 457 SLNB, 122 (26.7%) were positive for metastatic involvement, and of these patients only 34% were found to have further lymph node involvement after axillary lymph node clearance (ALNC). Only 8% of our total patient cohort had non sentinel node involvement at completion ALNC. Using univariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (p0.009), grade (p0.007) and size (p0.006) were all significant predictors for having a positive ALNC. Conclusion: Only 8% of the total number of patients had an additional positive lymph node found in their completion axillary clearance. Our results add to this existing knowledge on the subject, and show that there are certain factors which should be carefully considered pre-operatively in order to help inform patient and surgeon choice regarding management of the axilla.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research & therapy\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"15-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research & therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2015-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2015-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导论:虽然前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是乳腺癌临床和放射学阴性腋窝的金标准,但阳性淋巴结的后续处理目前正在审查中,Z0011试验发表引起了许多争论。我们的目的是确定在我们的患者队列中是否有任何预测因素可以帮助决定患者是否需要进一步的腋窝淋巴结清除。方法:对前瞻性维护的SLNB患者数据库及其组织学进行回顾性分析。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定任何预测因素。结果:本院乳腺科三年内共行457例SLNB手术。患者平均年龄为61.9岁(31-89岁)。在这457例SLNB中,122例(26.7%)为转移灶阳性,这些患者中只有34%在腋窝淋巴结清除(ALNC)后发现进一步的淋巴结累及。在我们的全部患者队列中,只有8%的患者在完全性ALNC时有非前哨淋巴结受累。单因素分析显示,淋巴血管浸润(p0.009)、分级(p0.007)和大小(p0.006)均为ALNC阳性的显著预测因子。结论:只有8%的患者在完成腋窝清扫时发现了额外的阳性淋巴结。我们的结果增加了这方面的现有知识,并表明术前应仔细考虑某些因素,以帮助告知患者和外科医生关于腋窝管理的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The positive sentinel lymph node biopsy- can we predict which patients will benefit from further surgery?
Introduction: Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the gold standard for clinical and radiological negative axillae in breast cancer, the subsequent management of positive nodes is currently under scrutiny with the Z0011 trial publication causing much debate. Our aim was to determine whether there were any predictive factors in our cohort of patients that could assist in the decision of whether the patient required a further axillary lymph node clearance. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent SLNB and their histology was performed. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify any predictive factors. Results: Our Breast Unit performed 457 SLNB over the three years. The mean age of patients was 61.9 years (range 31-89 years). Of these 457 SLNB, 122 (26.7%) were positive for metastatic involvement, and of these patients only 34% were found to have further lymph node involvement after axillary lymph node clearance (ALNC). Only 8% of our total patient cohort had non sentinel node involvement at completion ALNC. Using univariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (p0.009), grade (p0.007) and size (p0.006) were all significant predictors for having a positive ALNC. Conclusion: Only 8% of the total number of patients had an additional positive lymph node found in their completion axillary clearance. Our results add to this existing knowledge on the subject, and show that there are certain factors which should be carefully considered pre-operatively in order to help inform patient and surgeon choice regarding management of the axilla.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信