根据博洛尼亚标准诊断为卵巢反应低的患者使用促性腺激素与常规促性腺激素的比较

Martin Díaz-Bachiller, Paula Ferrer-Molina, Mónica Muñoz-García, Carmen Calatayud-Lliso
{"title":"根据博洛尼亚标准诊断为卵巢反应低的患者使用促性腺激素与常规促性腺激素的比较","authors":"Martin Díaz-Bachiller,&nbsp;Paula Ferrer-Molina,&nbsp;Mónica Muñoz-García,&nbsp;Carmen Calatayud-Lliso","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2017.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Gonadotropin-releasing hormones are not only more comfortable as an assisted reproduction treatment, but also have the pharmacokinetics that could benefit poor responders to ovarian stimulation. A comparison is made with the results from the use of corifollitropin in patients with cycles produced with conventional gonadotropins.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An analysis was performed on the results obtained after stimulating the same group of patients with low ovarian reserve, according to Bologna criteria, with conventional gonadotropins versus corifollitropin alpha. The number of mature oocytes collected was the primary study variable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>It was found that the use of corifollitropin alpha in patients with a diagnosis of low ovarian response is at least as effective as the conventional gonadotropin regimens given daily.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>With our results it can be conclude that offering corifollitropin to poor responders is at least as efficient as conventional gonadotropins, but it adds several advantages in terms of comfort and dosage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medre.2017.01.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparación entre el uso de corifolitropina alfa frente a gonadotropinas convencionales en pacientes con diagnóstico de baja respuesta ovárica según los criterios de Bolonia\",\"authors\":\"Martin Díaz-Bachiller,&nbsp;Paula Ferrer-Molina,&nbsp;Mónica Muñoz-García,&nbsp;Carmen Calatayud-Lliso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medre.2017.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Gonadotropin-releasing hormones are not only more comfortable as an assisted reproduction treatment, but also have the pharmacokinetics that could benefit poor responders to ovarian stimulation. A comparison is made with the results from the use of corifollitropin in patients with cycles produced with conventional gonadotropins.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An analysis was performed on the results obtained after stimulating the same group of patients with low ovarian reserve, according to Bologna criteria, with conventional gonadotropins versus corifollitropin alpha. The number of mature oocytes collected was the primary study variable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>It was found that the use of corifollitropin alpha in patients with a diagnosis of low ovarian response is at least as effective as the conventional gonadotropin regimens given daily.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>With our results it can be conclude that offering corifollitropin to poor responders is at least as efficient as conventional gonadotropins, but it adds several advantages in terms of comfort and dosage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 11-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medre.2017.01.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932017300026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932017300026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

促性腺激素释放激素不仅作为辅助生殖治疗更舒适,而且具有药代动力学,可以使对卵巢刺激反应不良的患者受益。与常规促性腺激素产生周期的患者使用科里福利孕激素的结果进行比较。材料和方法根据博洛尼亚标准,对同一组卵巢储备不足的患者分别使用常规促性腺激素和corifolitropin α进行刺激后获得的结果进行分析。收集的成熟卵母细胞数量是主要的研究变量。结果发现,在诊断为卵巢反应低的患者中使用促性腺激素至少与每日给予常规促性腺激素方案一样有效。根据我们的研究结果,我们可以得出这样的结论:对不良反应者提供促性腺激素至少与常规促性腺激素一样有效,但它在舒适性和剂量方面增加了一些优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparación entre el uso de corifolitropina alfa frente a gonadotropinas convencionales en pacientes con diagnóstico de baja respuesta ovárica según los criterios de Bolonia

Introduction

Gonadotropin-releasing hormones are not only more comfortable as an assisted reproduction treatment, but also have the pharmacokinetics that could benefit poor responders to ovarian stimulation. A comparison is made with the results from the use of corifollitropin in patients with cycles produced with conventional gonadotropins.

Material and methods

An analysis was performed on the results obtained after stimulating the same group of patients with low ovarian reserve, according to Bologna criteria, with conventional gonadotropins versus corifollitropin alpha. The number of mature oocytes collected was the primary study variable.

Results

It was found that the use of corifollitropin alpha in patients with a diagnosis of low ovarian response is at least as effective as the conventional gonadotropin regimens given daily.

Discussion

With our results it can be conclude that offering corifollitropin to poor responders is at least as efficient as conventional gonadotropins, but it adds several advantages in terms of comfort and dosage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信