Lillie Grace Veazey, Marcela C. Weber, Stefan E. Schulenberg
{"title":"Claremont目的量表在新兴成年大学生群体中的心理测量验证","authors":"Lillie Grace Veazey, Marcela C. Weber, Stefan E. Schulenberg","doi":"10.1177/26320770231171020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose is a key protective factor for well-being, resilience, and satisfaction with life. The Claremont Purpose Scale (CPS) was developed by Bronk and colleagues with adolescents and emerging adults to measure three dimensions of purpose: Meaning, Goal-Directedness, and Beyond-the-Self. The psychometric properties examined in the original scale development paper were replicated with our independent, emerging adult college student sample: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of a 3-factor model, good-to-excellent internal consistency, convergent validity with a measure of general perceived meaning in life (MLQ-P), and discriminant validity with a measure of self-reported depression (DASS-21-D). Additional psychometrics examined in this study were test–retest reliability, a 1-factor CFA model, correlations with stress and anxiety, and descriptive statistics that had not yet been reported in the literature. Beyond-the-self items did not load well onto the overall factor in the 1-factor model, and their correlations with other scales (MLQ-S, DASS-21 subscales) differed significantly from the correlations between these other scales and the CPS total, General Meaning, and Goal-Directedness scores. Implications of these data include strong support for the use of each subscale as a distinct, psychometric index, and we recommend the total scale score not be used as a measure of overall purpose. Clearly, there are separate, but related, facets to this measure that, while positive, undermine the utility of a global purpose score. A slightly changed naming of the CPS to the “Claremont Purpose Scales” could promote their use as three separate scales instead of a single, total scale score.","PeriodicalId":73906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prevention and health promotion","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Psychometric Validation of the Claremont Purpose Scale with an Emerging Adult University Student Population\",\"authors\":\"Lillie Grace Veazey, Marcela C. Weber, Stefan E. Schulenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26320770231171020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose is a key protective factor for well-being, resilience, and satisfaction with life. The Claremont Purpose Scale (CPS) was developed by Bronk and colleagues with adolescents and emerging adults to measure three dimensions of purpose: Meaning, Goal-Directedness, and Beyond-the-Self. The psychometric properties examined in the original scale development paper were replicated with our independent, emerging adult college student sample: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of a 3-factor model, good-to-excellent internal consistency, convergent validity with a measure of general perceived meaning in life (MLQ-P), and discriminant validity with a measure of self-reported depression (DASS-21-D). Additional psychometrics examined in this study were test–retest reliability, a 1-factor CFA model, correlations with stress and anxiety, and descriptive statistics that had not yet been reported in the literature. Beyond-the-self items did not load well onto the overall factor in the 1-factor model, and their correlations with other scales (MLQ-S, DASS-21 subscales) differed significantly from the correlations between these other scales and the CPS total, General Meaning, and Goal-Directedness scores. Implications of these data include strong support for the use of each subscale as a distinct, psychometric index, and we recommend the total scale score not be used as a measure of overall purpose. Clearly, there are separate, but related, facets to this measure that, while positive, undermine the utility of a global purpose score. A slightly changed naming of the CPS to the “Claremont Purpose Scales” could promote their use as three separate scales instead of a single, total scale score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of prevention and health promotion\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of prevention and health promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320770231171020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prevention and health promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320770231171020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Psychometric Validation of the Claremont Purpose Scale with an Emerging Adult University Student Population
Purpose is a key protective factor for well-being, resilience, and satisfaction with life. The Claremont Purpose Scale (CPS) was developed by Bronk and colleagues with adolescents and emerging adults to measure three dimensions of purpose: Meaning, Goal-Directedness, and Beyond-the-Self. The psychometric properties examined in the original scale development paper were replicated with our independent, emerging adult college student sample: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of a 3-factor model, good-to-excellent internal consistency, convergent validity with a measure of general perceived meaning in life (MLQ-P), and discriminant validity with a measure of self-reported depression (DASS-21-D). Additional psychometrics examined in this study were test–retest reliability, a 1-factor CFA model, correlations with stress and anxiety, and descriptive statistics that had not yet been reported in the literature. Beyond-the-self items did not load well onto the overall factor in the 1-factor model, and their correlations with other scales (MLQ-S, DASS-21 subscales) differed significantly from the correlations between these other scales and the CPS total, General Meaning, and Goal-Directedness scores. Implications of these data include strong support for the use of each subscale as a distinct, psychometric index, and we recommend the total scale score not be used as a measure of overall purpose. Clearly, there are separate, but related, facets to this measure that, while positive, undermine the utility of a global purpose score. A slightly changed naming of the CPS to the “Claremont Purpose Scales” could promote their use as three separate scales instead of a single, total scale score.