灵长类动物的食物偏好即使在不确定的条件下也能预测它们的食物选择

S. Huskisson, Crystal L. Egelkamp, S. L. Jacobson, S. R. Ross, Lydia M. Hopper
{"title":"灵长类动物的食物偏好即使在不确定的条件下也能预测它们的食物选择","authors":"S. Huskisson, Crystal L. Egelkamp, S. L. Jacobson, S. R. Ross, Lydia M. Hopper","doi":"10.26451/ABC.08.01.06.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Primates’ food preferences are typically assessed under conditions of certainty. To increase ecological validity, and to explore primates’ decision making from a comparative perspective, we tested three primate species (Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla gorilla, Macaca fuscata) (N = 18) in two food-preference tests that created different conditions of uncertainty. In the first, we showed subjects pairs of photographs of six foods in a randomized manner within each session, so subjects could not predict the next pairing and had to respond in accordance with their preferences. We found individual differences in subjects’ preference and differences in six subjects’ preferences when comparing their selections in this test to selections made when trials were blocked by food pairing (tested previously: Huskisson et al., 2020). In in each trial of the second test we paired the food stimuli with a ‘chance’ symbol, representing a random reward of one of the six foods. Across species, each subject’s propensity to select chance over the known food varied by food type: when the known option was highly preferred, subjects were less likely to select the chance symbol. Additionally, 61.11% of the subjects’ rates of selecting foods in the first test showed a positive trend with the rates of selecting the same foods under conditions of uncertainty here; three of these subjects’ selection rates were significantly correlated between tests. Finally, if the food chimpanzees received for selecting the chance symbol was a preferred food, they were more likely to select chance again in the subsequent trial.","PeriodicalId":31700,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behavior and Cognition","volume":"279 1","pages":"69-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primates' Food Preferences Predict Their Food Choices Even Under Uncertain Conditions\",\"authors\":\"S. Huskisson, Crystal L. Egelkamp, S. L. Jacobson, S. R. Ross, Lydia M. Hopper\",\"doi\":\"10.26451/ABC.08.01.06.2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Primates’ food preferences are typically assessed under conditions of certainty. To increase ecological validity, and to explore primates’ decision making from a comparative perspective, we tested three primate species (Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla gorilla, Macaca fuscata) (N = 18) in two food-preference tests that created different conditions of uncertainty. In the first, we showed subjects pairs of photographs of six foods in a randomized manner within each session, so subjects could not predict the next pairing and had to respond in accordance with their preferences. We found individual differences in subjects’ preference and differences in six subjects’ preferences when comparing their selections in this test to selections made when trials were blocked by food pairing (tested previously: Huskisson et al., 2020). In in each trial of the second test we paired the food stimuli with a ‘chance’ symbol, representing a random reward of one of the six foods. Across species, each subject’s propensity to select chance over the known food varied by food type: when the known option was highly preferred, subjects were less likely to select the chance symbol. Additionally, 61.11% of the subjects’ rates of selecting foods in the first test showed a positive trend with the rates of selecting the same foods under conditions of uncertainty here; three of these subjects’ selection rates were significantly correlated between tests. Finally, if the food chimpanzees received for selecting the chance symbol was a preferred food, they were more likely to select chance again in the subsequent trial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Behavior and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"279 1\",\"pages\":\"69-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Behavior and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26451/ABC.08.01.06.2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behavior and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26451/ABC.08.01.06.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

灵长类动物的食物偏好通常是在确定的条件下评估的。为了提高生态有效性,并从比较的角度探讨灵长类动物的决策,我们对3种灵长类动物(Pan troglodytes, Gorilla Gorilla Gorilla, Macaca fuscata) (N = 18)进行了两项食物偏好测试,创造了不同的不确定性条件。首先,我们在每次实验中以随机的方式向受试者展示六种食物的成对照片,因此受试者无法预测下一组食物,必须根据自己的偏好做出反应。当比较受试者在该测试中的选择与被食物配对阻碍时的选择时,我们发现受试者偏好存在个体差异,并且六个受试者的偏好存在差异(先前测试:Huskisson et al., 2020)。在第二个测试的每个试验中,我们将食物刺激与一个“机会”符号配对,代表六种食物中的一种的随机奖励。在不同的物种中,每个被试者选择机会而不是已知食物的倾向因食物类型而异:当已知食物被高度偏爱时,被试者不太可能选择机会符号。此外,61.11%的受试者在第一次测试中选择食物的比率与这里不确定条件下选择相同食物的比率呈正趋势;其中三名受试者的选择率在测试之间显著相关。最后,如果黑猩猩在选择机会符号时得到的食物是一种更喜欢的食物,它们更有可能在随后的试验中再次选择机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primates' Food Preferences Predict Their Food Choices Even Under Uncertain Conditions
Primates’ food preferences are typically assessed under conditions of certainty. To increase ecological validity, and to explore primates’ decision making from a comparative perspective, we tested three primate species (Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla gorilla, Macaca fuscata) (N = 18) in two food-preference tests that created different conditions of uncertainty. In the first, we showed subjects pairs of photographs of six foods in a randomized manner within each session, so subjects could not predict the next pairing and had to respond in accordance with their preferences. We found individual differences in subjects’ preference and differences in six subjects’ preferences when comparing their selections in this test to selections made when trials were blocked by food pairing (tested previously: Huskisson et al., 2020). In in each trial of the second test we paired the food stimuli with a ‘chance’ symbol, representing a random reward of one of the six foods. Across species, each subject’s propensity to select chance over the known food varied by food type: when the known option was highly preferred, subjects were less likely to select the chance symbol. Additionally, 61.11% of the subjects’ rates of selecting foods in the first test showed a positive trend with the rates of selecting the same foods under conditions of uncertainty here; three of these subjects’ selection rates were significantly correlated between tests. Finally, if the food chimpanzees received for selecting the chance symbol was a preferred food, they were more likely to select chance again in the subsequent trial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书