{"title":"睡眠剥夺脑电图在儿童癫痫症诊断中的价值","authors":"S. Rafiei","doi":"10.1055/S-2006-945869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The provocative effects of sleep deprivation (SD) on patients with\nseizure disorder and on the electroencephalogram (EEG) are well\nknown.The purpose of the study was to test its routine use and\nusefulness in the pediatric and adolescent age group with, or suspect\nof having, seizure disorder, especially those presenting with first\nunprovoked seizure. Between September 2000 and November 2002, among\npatients referring to the author's clinic and the Pediatric Emergency\nDepartment of Nemazi Hospital, Shiraz, 598 children and adolescents\nwere randomly assigned to a 10-minute surface EEG, either routinely, or\nafter a period of partial or total SD. Those who refused or could not\ntolerate the SD procedure entered the routine group. The EEG's were\nanalyzed for the presence of epileptic abnormality. Of 598 patients,\n544( 91%) had clinical seizures; the rest (54, 9%) were seizure\nsuspects or had seizure \"mimickers\" (syncope, night terrors,\npseudo-seizures, etc). Of seizure patients, 210 ( 38.6 % ) suffered\nfrom a first unprovoked seizure, and the rest (334, 61.4%) had more\nthan one seizure episode at the time of EEG performance. Abnormal\nepileptiform EEG's were more frequently seen in the group of seizure\npatients who were sleep-deprived before performing the EEG, as compared\nto the routine group. Conversely, more normal EEG's were seen upon\nroutine performance of EEG ( p value <00001, χ2 = 76.5). \nSimilarly, more abnormal sleep-deprived EEG's were seen in patients\nwith first unprovoked seizure than when EEG was done routinely in this\nsubgroup of patients. Patients with complex partial seizure had\nsignificantly more abnormal EEG's when subjected to SD (p<00001). \nOlder patients could tolerate SD better than the younger age group; so\nmore routine EEG's had to be performed in the younger age group.Younger\nchildren could only tolerate partial SD. There was no difference in the\nyield of EEG in patients with absence epilepsy between the two groups.\nIn 5 patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, SD precipitated a\ngeneralized tonic-clonic seizure which necessitated acute\nanti-epileptic drug administration to the seizure activity. All\npatients with non-seizure episodes showed normal EEG's. In conclusion\nSD can be safely applied in the work-up of selected pediatric patients\nwith seizure disorder, especially in those with their first unprovoked\nseizure, in whom an abnormal EEG might dictate anti-epileptic drug\ntherapy. Not all children with seizure disorder need to undergo SD for\nEEG, as it may not be necessary in some, and intolerable in others. In\nnon-seizure episodes, if used in appropriate pediatric age groups, it\ncan be very helpful to ensure that a seizure disorder is not present.","PeriodicalId":22988,"journal":{"name":"The Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"29 1","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"USEFULNESS OF SLEEP-DEPRIVED EEG IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SEIZURE DISORDERS IN CIDLDREN\",\"authors\":\"S. Rafiei\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/S-2006-945869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The provocative effects of sleep deprivation (SD) on patients with\\nseizure disorder and on the electroencephalogram (EEG) are well\\nknown.The purpose of the study was to test its routine use and\\nusefulness in the pediatric and adolescent age group with, or suspect\\nof having, seizure disorder, especially those presenting with first\\nunprovoked seizure. Between September 2000 and November 2002, among\\npatients referring to the author's clinic and the Pediatric Emergency\\nDepartment of Nemazi Hospital, Shiraz, 598 children and adolescents\\nwere randomly assigned to a 10-minute surface EEG, either routinely, or\\nafter a period of partial or total SD. Those who refused or could not\\ntolerate the SD procedure entered the routine group. The EEG's were\\nanalyzed for the presence of epileptic abnormality. Of 598 patients,\\n544( 91%) had clinical seizures; the rest (54, 9%) were seizure\\nsuspects or had seizure \\\"mimickers\\\" (syncope, night terrors,\\npseudo-seizures, etc). Of seizure patients, 210 ( 38.6 % ) suffered\\nfrom a first unprovoked seizure, and the rest (334, 61.4%) had more\\nthan one seizure episode at the time of EEG performance. Abnormal\\nepileptiform EEG's were more frequently seen in the group of seizure\\npatients who were sleep-deprived before performing the EEG, as compared\\nto the routine group. Conversely, more normal EEG's were seen upon\\nroutine performance of EEG ( p value <00001, χ2 = 76.5). \\nSimilarly, more abnormal sleep-deprived EEG's were seen in patients\\nwith first unprovoked seizure than when EEG was done routinely in this\\nsubgroup of patients. Patients with complex partial seizure had\\nsignificantly more abnormal EEG's when subjected to SD (p<00001). \\nOlder patients could tolerate SD better than the younger age group; so\\nmore routine EEG's had to be performed in the younger age group.Younger\\nchildren could only tolerate partial SD. There was no difference in the\\nyield of EEG in patients with absence epilepsy between the two groups.\\nIn 5 patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, SD precipitated a\\ngeneralized tonic-clonic seizure which necessitated acute\\nanti-epileptic drug administration to the seizure activity. All\\npatients with non-seizure episodes showed normal EEG's. In conclusion\\nSD can be safely applied in the work-up of selected pediatric patients\\nwith seizure disorder, especially in those with their first unprovoked\\nseizure, in whom an abnormal EEG might dictate anti-epileptic drug\\ntherapy. Not all children with seizure disorder need to undergo SD for\\nEEG, as it may not be necessary in some, and intolerable in others. In\\nnon-seizure episodes, if used in appropriate pediatric age groups, it\\ncan be very helpful to ensure that a seizure disorder is not present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"21-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/S-2006-945869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/S-2006-945869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
USEFULNESS OF SLEEP-DEPRIVED EEG IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SEIZURE DISORDERS IN CIDLDREN
The provocative effects of sleep deprivation (SD) on patients with
seizure disorder and on the electroencephalogram (EEG) are well
known.The purpose of the study was to test its routine use and
usefulness in the pediatric and adolescent age group with, or suspect
of having, seizure disorder, especially those presenting with first
unprovoked seizure. Between September 2000 and November 2002, among
patients referring to the author's clinic and the Pediatric Emergency
Department of Nemazi Hospital, Shiraz, 598 children and adolescents
were randomly assigned to a 10-minute surface EEG, either routinely, or
after a period of partial or total SD. Those who refused or could not
tolerate the SD procedure entered the routine group. The EEG's were
analyzed for the presence of epileptic abnormality. Of 598 patients,
544( 91%) had clinical seizures; the rest (54, 9%) were seizure
suspects or had seizure "mimickers" (syncope, night terrors,
pseudo-seizures, etc). Of seizure patients, 210 ( 38.6 % ) suffered
from a first unprovoked seizure, and the rest (334, 61.4%) had more
than one seizure episode at the time of EEG performance. Abnormal
epileptiform EEG's were more frequently seen in the group of seizure
patients who were sleep-deprived before performing the EEG, as compared
to the routine group. Conversely, more normal EEG's were seen upon
routine performance of EEG ( p value <00001, χ2 = 76.5).
Similarly, more abnormal sleep-deprived EEG's were seen in patients
with first unprovoked seizure than when EEG was done routinely in this
subgroup of patients. Patients with complex partial seizure had
significantly more abnormal EEG's when subjected to SD (p<00001).
Older patients could tolerate SD better than the younger age group; so
more routine EEG's had to be performed in the younger age group.Younger
children could only tolerate partial SD. There was no difference in the
yield of EEG in patients with absence epilepsy between the two groups.
In 5 patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, SD precipitated a
generalized tonic-clonic seizure which necessitated acute
anti-epileptic drug administration to the seizure activity. All
patients with non-seizure episodes showed normal EEG's. In conclusion
SD can be safely applied in the work-up of selected pediatric patients
with seizure disorder, especially in those with their first unprovoked
seizure, in whom an abnormal EEG might dictate anti-epileptic drug
therapy. Not all children with seizure disorder need to undergo SD for
EEG, as it may not be necessary in some, and intolerable in others. In
non-seizure episodes, if used in appropriate pediatric age groups, it
can be very helpful to ensure that a seizure disorder is not present.