[血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂厄贝沙坦对高血压患者尿液标志物的影响]。

Shogo Kimura, Yuka Sekiya-Soga, Y. Kato, M. Mizutani, H. Ohashi
{"title":"[血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂厄贝沙坦对高血压患者尿液标志物的影响]。","authors":"Shogo Kimura, Yuka Sekiya-Soga, Y. Kato, M. Mizutani, H. Ohashi","doi":"10.1093/NDT/GFX163.MP123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nWe examined the effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB), irbesartan (Irb), on urinary markers in hypertensive patients.\n\n\nSUBJECTS AND METHODS\nWe evaluated 87 patients in a 12-month prospective study: Group 1) 33 patients who were newly administered Irb (100 mg); Group 2) 33 patients who were switched to Irb ; and Group 3) 21 patients who did not undergo change to pre-existing Irb administration. Height, weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, clinical parameters, urine protein : creatinine ratio (UPC), and urinary markers (liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP), N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase, α1-microglobulin, and β2-microglobulin) were measured at the baseline and at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. We examined changes in the clinical parameters, UPC, and urinary markers from the baseline.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA tendency toward hypotension was observed in all groups (group newly administered Irb, group switched to Irb, and group without changes to Irb), but the difference was not statistically significant. Urinary L-FABP concentration (μg/g x Cr) decreased from 13.2 --> 8.9 and13.2 --> 10.2 at 24 and 48 weeks, respectively, after administration (p < 0.01) in the group newly administered Irb, from 19.5 --> 10.1 at 48 weeks after administration (p < 0.01) in the switched group, and from 9.6 --> 8.3, 8.1, and 6.2 (p < 0.01) in the group without changes to Irb. Changes in the Irb-administered groups were readily apparent. UPC decreased in the Irb-administered groups (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in the other urinary markers. Changes in urinary L-FABP and UPC were positively correlated in all cases of the Irb-administered groups (r = 0.25-0.57, p < 0.05), but were not positively correlated in the group without changes to Irb administration. The change in UPC was positively correlated with changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in all cases (r = 0.23-0.57, p < 0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nIt was concluded that the urinary L-FABP level, blood pressure, and UPC of hypertensive patients should be managed in daily practice using an ARB, including Irb.","PeriodicalId":19721,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Jinzo Gakkai shi","volume":"1053 1","pages":"104-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB), Irbesartan, on urinary markers in hypertensive patients].\",\"authors\":\"Shogo Kimura, Yuka Sekiya-Soga, Y. Kato, M. Mizutani, H. Ohashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/NDT/GFX163.MP123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\nWe examined the effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB), irbesartan (Irb), on urinary markers in hypertensive patients.\\n\\n\\nSUBJECTS AND METHODS\\nWe evaluated 87 patients in a 12-month prospective study: Group 1) 33 patients who were newly administered Irb (100 mg); Group 2) 33 patients who were switched to Irb ; and Group 3) 21 patients who did not undergo change to pre-existing Irb administration. Height, weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, clinical parameters, urine protein : creatinine ratio (UPC), and urinary markers (liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP), N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase, α1-microglobulin, and β2-microglobulin) were measured at the baseline and at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. We examined changes in the clinical parameters, UPC, and urinary markers from the baseline.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nA tendency toward hypotension was observed in all groups (group newly administered Irb, group switched to Irb, and group without changes to Irb), but the difference was not statistically significant. Urinary L-FABP concentration (μg/g x Cr) decreased from 13.2 --> 8.9 and13.2 --> 10.2 at 24 and 48 weeks, respectively, after administration (p < 0.01) in the group newly administered Irb, from 19.5 --> 10.1 at 48 weeks after administration (p < 0.01) in the switched group, and from 9.6 --> 8.3, 8.1, and 6.2 (p < 0.01) in the group without changes to Irb. Changes in the Irb-administered groups were readily apparent. UPC decreased in the Irb-administered groups (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in the other urinary markers. Changes in urinary L-FABP and UPC were positively correlated in all cases of the Irb-administered groups (r = 0.25-0.57, p < 0.05), but were not positively correlated in the group without changes to Irb administration. The change in UPC was positively correlated with changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in all cases (r = 0.23-0.57, p < 0.05).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nIt was concluded that the urinary L-FABP level, blood pressure, and UPC of hypertensive patients should be managed in daily practice using an ARB, including Irb.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Jinzo Gakkai shi\",\"volume\":\"1053 1\",\"pages\":\"104-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Jinzo Gakkai shi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/NDT/GFX163.MP123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Jinzo Gakkai shi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/NDT/GFX163.MP123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的观察血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂厄贝沙坦(Irb)对高血压患者尿标志物的影响。研究对象和方法在一项为期12个月的前瞻性研究中,我们对87例患者进行了评估:第一组33例患者新给药Irb (100 mg);组2)转入Irb治疗的患者33例;组3)21例未改变原有Irb给药的患者。在基线和12、24和48周时测量身高、体重、收缩压和舒张压、临床参数、尿蛋白:肌酐比(UPC)和尿标志物(肝型脂肪酸结合蛋白(L-FABP)、n -乙酰-β-d-氨基葡萄糖酶、α1微球蛋白和β2微球蛋白)。从基线开始,我们检查了临床参数、UPC和尿液标志物的变化。结果所有组(新给药组、改用Irb组和未改用Irb组)均有低血压倾向,但差异无统计学意义。尿L-FABP浓度(μg/g x Cr)在给药后24周和48周分别从13.2 -> 8.9和13.2 -> 10.2 (p < 0.01),在给药后48周从19.5 -> 10.1 (p < 0.01),在未改变Irb组从9.6 -> 8.3,8.1和6.2 (p < 0.01)。irb给药组的变化很明显。注射irb组UPC降低(p < 0.05),但其他尿液标志物无显著差异。尿L-FABP和UPC的变化在所有给药组中均呈正相关(r = 0.25-0.57, p < 0.05),但在未给药组中无正相关。UPC变化与收缩压、舒张压变化呈正相关(r = 0.23 ~ 0.57, p < 0.05)。结论高血压患者的尿L-FABP水平、血压和UPC应在日常实践中使用包括Irb在内的ARB进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB), Irbesartan, on urinary markers in hypertensive patients].
PURPOSE We examined the effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB), irbesartan (Irb), on urinary markers in hypertensive patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS We evaluated 87 patients in a 12-month prospective study: Group 1) 33 patients who were newly administered Irb (100 mg); Group 2) 33 patients who were switched to Irb ; and Group 3) 21 patients who did not undergo change to pre-existing Irb administration. Height, weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, clinical parameters, urine protein : creatinine ratio (UPC), and urinary markers (liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP), N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase, α1-microglobulin, and β2-microglobulin) were measured at the baseline and at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. We examined changes in the clinical parameters, UPC, and urinary markers from the baseline. RESULTS A tendency toward hypotension was observed in all groups (group newly administered Irb, group switched to Irb, and group without changes to Irb), but the difference was not statistically significant. Urinary L-FABP concentration (μg/g x Cr) decreased from 13.2 --> 8.9 and13.2 --> 10.2 at 24 and 48 weeks, respectively, after administration (p < 0.01) in the group newly administered Irb, from 19.5 --> 10.1 at 48 weeks after administration (p < 0.01) in the switched group, and from 9.6 --> 8.3, 8.1, and 6.2 (p < 0.01) in the group without changes to Irb. Changes in the Irb-administered groups were readily apparent. UPC decreased in the Irb-administered groups (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in the other urinary markers. Changes in urinary L-FABP and UPC were positively correlated in all cases of the Irb-administered groups (r = 0.25-0.57, p < 0.05), but were not positively correlated in the group without changes to Irb administration. The change in UPC was positively correlated with changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in all cases (r = 0.23-0.57, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION It was concluded that the urinary L-FABP level, blood pressure, and UPC of hypertensive patients should be managed in daily practice using an ARB, including Irb.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信