{"title":"在人工土壤中旋转时间工具模拟土壤力","authors":"Safal Kshetri, B. Steward, M. Tekeste","doi":"10.13031/trans.14336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HighlightsA mathematical model of soil reaction forces on a rotary tine tool was developed.Soil bin experiments using artificial soil enabled observation of soil failure due to soil-tine interaction.The model-predicted forces were similar to experimentally measured forces.Abstract. Understanding soil-tool interaction can enable better control of weeding tools to achieve higher weeding efficacy. The interaction between a vertical tine (mounted on a rotating disc) and soil was investigated using a mathematical model that estimated soil horizontal forces on the tine operating at different linear and rotational velocities. The kinematics associated with the linear and rotational velocities of the rotary tine tool were modeled, and the shearing and inertial forces were estimated. To evaluate model performance with different experimental factors, two sets of soil bin experiments were conducted using an artificial soil: with one tine to estimate model parameters and with two tines 180° apart. Experimental factors were longitudinal velocity (travel speed) at three levels (0.09, 0.29, and 0.5 m s-1) and speed ratio, i.e., the ratio of longitudinal velocity to peripheral velocity of the tines, at three levels (1, 1.5, and 2). Soil horizontal force and torque on the rotary tine tool were measured. A nonlinear least squares method was used to estimate model parameters from the experimental data, resulting in shearing force coefficients ranging from 2.9 to 37 N and inertial force coefficients ranging from 16 to 528 N s2 m-2. The variations in the shearing and inertial forces on the tine were due to differences in soil failure patterns among the treatments. The predicted longitudinal and tangential forces for two tines using the model showed trends that were similar to the forces measured in the experiment. However, the model overestimated the predicted forces because it did not account for the reduced force on a tine due to soil disturbance created by the other tine. Keywords: Soil-tine interaction, Weed control.","PeriodicalId":23120,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the ASABE","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Soil Forces on a Rotary Tine Tool in Artificial Soil\",\"authors\":\"Safal Kshetri, B. Steward, M. Tekeste\",\"doi\":\"10.13031/trans.14336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"HighlightsA mathematical model of soil reaction forces on a rotary tine tool was developed.Soil bin experiments using artificial soil enabled observation of soil failure due to soil-tine interaction.The model-predicted forces were similar to experimentally measured forces.Abstract. Understanding soil-tool interaction can enable better control of weeding tools to achieve higher weeding efficacy. The interaction between a vertical tine (mounted on a rotating disc) and soil was investigated using a mathematical model that estimated soil horizontal forces on the tine operating at different linear and rotational velocities. The kinematics associated with the linear and rotational velocities of the rotary tine tool were modeled, and the shearing and inertial forces were estimated. To evaluate model performance with different experimental factors, two sets of soil bin experiments were conducted using an artificial soil: with one tine to estimate model parameters and with two tines 180° apart. Experimental factors were longitudinal velocity (travel speed) at three levels (0.09, 0.29, and 0.5 m s-1) and speed ratio, i.e., the ratio of longitudinal velocity to peripheral velocity of the tines, at three levels (1, 1.5, and 2). Soil horizontal force and torque on the rotary tine tool were measured. A nonlinear least squares method was used to estimate model parameters from the experimental data, resulting in shearing force coefficients ranging from 2.9 to 37 N and inertial force coefficients ranging from 16 to 528 N s2 m-2. The variations in the shearing and inertial forces on the tine were due to differences in soil failure patterns among the treatments. The predicted longitudinal and tangential forces for two tines using the model showed trends that were similar to the forces measured in the experiment. However, the model overestimated the predicted forces because it did not account for the reduced force on a tine due to soil disturbance created by the other tine. Keywords: Soil-tine interaction, Weed control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the ASABE\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the ASABE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.14336\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the ASABE","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.14336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
建立了旋转测时工具土体反力的数学模型。利用人工土壤进行土壤箱试验,可以观察到土壤-时间相互作用造成的土壤破坏。模型预测的力与实验测量的力相似。了解土-工具的相互作用,可以更好地控制除草工具,达到更高的除草效果。利用数学模型研究了垂直时间(安装在旋转圆盘上)与土壤之间的相互作用,该模型估计了在不同线速度和旋转速度下运行的时间上的土壤水平力。对旋转刀具的线速度和转速进行了运动学建模,并对剪切力和惯性力进行了估计。为了评估不同试验因素下模型的性能,采用人工土壤进行了两组土壤箱试验:一次估计模型参数,两次间隔180°。实验因素为三个水平(0.09、0.29和0.5 m s-1)下的纵向速度(行驶速度)和三个水平(1、1.5和2)下的速比,即纵向速度与周围速度的比值。测量土壤水平力和旋转时间工具上的扭矩。利用非线性最小二乘法对实验数据进行模型参数估计,得到剪切力系数为2.9 ~ 37 N,惯性力系数为16 ~ 528 N s2 m-2。剪切力和惯性力随时间的变化是由于不同处理的土体破坏模式不同造成的。使用该模型两次预测的纵向和切向力显示出与实验中测量的力相似的趋势。然而,该模型高估了预测力,因为它没有考虑到由于另一个时间产生的土壤扰动而减少的力。关键词:土-时相互作用;杂草防治;
Modeling Soil Forces on a Rotary Tine Tool in Artificial Soil
HighlightsA mathematical model of soil reaction forces on a rotary tine tool was developed.Soil bin experiments using artificial soil enabled observation of soil failure due to soil-tine interaction.The model-predicted forces were similar to experimentally measured forces.Abstract. Understanding soil-tool interaction can enable better control of weeding tools to achieve higher weeding efficacy. The interaction between a vertical tine (mounted on a rotating disc) and soil was investigated using a mathematical model that estimated soil horizontal forces on the tine operating at different linear and rotational velocities. The kinematics associated with the linear and rotational velocities of the rotary tine tool were modeled, and the shearing and inertial forces were estimated. To evaluate model performance with different experimental factors, two sets of soil bin experiments were conducted using an artificial soil: with one tine to estimate model parameters and with two tines 180° apart. Experimental factors were longitudinal velocity (travel speed) at three levels (0.09, 0.29, and 0.5 m s-1) and speed ratio, i.e., the ratio of longitudinal velocity to peripheral velocity of the tines, at three levels (1, 1.5, and 2). Soil horizontal force and torque on the rotary tine tool were measured. A nonlinear least squares method was used to estimate model parameters from the experimental data, resulting in shearing force coefficients ranging from 2.9 to 37 N and inertial force coefficients ranging from 16 to 528 N s2 m-2. The variations in the shearing and inertial forces on the tine were due to differences in soil failure patterns among the treatments. The predicted longitudinal and tangential forces for two tines using the model showed trends that were similar to the forces measured in the experiment. However, the model overestimated the predicted forces because it did not account for the reduced force on a tine due to soil disturbance created by the other tine. Keywords: Soil-tine interaction, Weed control.
期刊介绍:
This peer-reviewed journal publishes research that advances the engineering of agricultural, food, and biological systems. Submissions must include original data, analysis or design, or synthesis of existing information; research information for the improvement of education, design, construction, or manufacturing practice; or significant and convincing evidence that confirms and strengthens the findings of others or that revises ideas or challenges accepted theory.