两种估算方法在成人胸部CT辐射剂量评估中的应用价值

Q4 Medicine
Junna Wang, Shiwei Wang, Zhichao Xu, Dongya Ling
{"title":"两种估算方法在成人胸部CT辐射剂量评估中的应用价值","authors":"Junna Wang, Shiwei Wang, Zhichao Xu, Dongya Ling","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the application value of CTDIvol and size-specific dose estimate(SSDE) in evaluating the radiation dose of adult chest CT. \n \n \nMethods \nA retrospective analysis was made on the CTDIvoland SSDE of 128 patients who underwent chest CT scanning in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from March to April 2017 and all images are adequate for diagnosis. The subjects were divided into three groups according to body mass index (BMI): Group A, 38 cases with 16≤BMI<21.1 kg/m2; Group B, 53 cases with 21.1≤BMI<23.9 kg/m2; Group C, 37 cases with 23.9≤BMI<34.1 kg/m2. The diameters of anterior-posterior (AP) and left-right (LAT) of each patient were measured in the slice of nipple level, and CTDIvol, effective diameter (ED), conversion factor (fsize) and SSDE of each patient were recorded and calculated. Meanwhile, the differences between CTDIvol and SSDE in different BMI groups were compared. \n \n \nResults \nSSDE of each group was higher than CTDIvol, and increased by 50.13%, 42.83% and 33.68% in group A, B and C, respectively. There were significant differences in radiation dose between CTDIvol and SSDE in the three groups (t=-48.873, -57.001, -32.651, P<0.05). There were significant differences in ED, fsize, CTDIvol and SSDE among the three groups (F=51.456, 47.749, 113.916, 106.449, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nSSDE can evaluate the radiation dose absorbed by patients with different body types in chest CT, while CTDIvol underestimated the radiation dose.The lower BMI, the greater the underestimated dose value, the more radiation dose absorbed. \n \n \nKey words: \nRadiation dose; Chest; CT; Size-specific dose estimate","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"217 1","pages":"711-714"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application value of the two estimation methods in evaluating the radiation dose of adult chest CT\",\"authors\":\"Junna Wang, Shiwei Wang, Zhichao Xu, Dongya Ling\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.09.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the application value of CTDIvol and size-specific dose estimate(SSDE) in evaluating the radiation dose of adult chest CT. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA retrospective analysis was made on the CTDIvoland SSDE of 128 patients who underwent chest CT scanning in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from March to April 2017 and all images are adequate for diagnosis. The subjects were divided into three groups according to body mass index (BMI): Group A, 38 cases with 16≤BMI<21.1 kg/m2; Group B, 53 cases with 21.1≤BMI<23.9 kg/m2; Group C, 37 cases with 23.9≤BMI<34.1 kg/m2. The diameters of anterior-posterior (AP) and left-right (LAT) of each patient were measured in the slice of nipple level, and CTDIvol, effective diameter (ED), conversion factor (fsize) and SSDE of each patient were recorded and calculated. Meanwhile, the differences between CTDIvol and SSDE in different BMI groups were compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nSSDE of each group was higher than CTDIvol, and increased by 50.13%, 42.83% and 33.68% in group A, B and C, respectively. There were significant differences in radiation dose between CTDIvol and SSDE in the three groups (t=-48.873, -57.001, -32.651, P<0.05). There were significant differences in ED, fsize, CTDIvol and SSDE among the three groups (F=51.456, 47.749, 113.916, 106.449, P<0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nSSDE can evaluate the radiation dose absorbed by patients with different body types in chest CT, while CTDIvol underestimated the radiation dose.The lower BMI, the greater the underestimated dose value, the more radiation dose absorbed. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nRadiation dose; Chest; CT; Size-specific dose estimate\",\"PeriodicalId\":36403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"volume\":\"217 1\",\"pages\":\"711-714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.09.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.09.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的探讨CTDIvol和尺寸特异性剂量估算(SSDE)在成人胸部CT放射剂量评估中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析2017年3月至4月在浙江中医药大学第一附属医院行胸部CT扫描的128例患者的CTDIvoland SSDE,所有图像均可用于诊断。按体重指数(BMI)分为3组:A组,16≤BMI<21.1 kg/m2 38例;B组53例,21.1≤BMI<23.9 kg/m2;C组37例,23.9≤BMI<34.1 kg/m2。在乳头水平片上测量每位患者的前后径(AP)和左右径(LAT),记录并计算每位患者的CTDIvol、有效径(ED)、转换因子(fsize)和SSDE。同时比较不同BMI组CTDIvol和SSDE的差异。结果各组SSDE均高于CTDIvol, A、B、C组分别升高50.13%、42.83%、33.68%。三组CTDIvol与SSDE放射剂量比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-48.873, -57.001, -32.651, P<0.05)。三组患者ED、fsize、CTDIvol、SSDE差异均有统计学意义(F=51.456、47.749、113.916、106.449,P<0.05)。结论SSDE可以评估不同体型患者在胸部CT中所吸收的辐射剂量,而CTDIvol则低估了辐射剂量。BMI越低,低估的剂量值越大,吸收的辐射剂量越大。关键词:辐射剂量;胸部;CT;尺寸特异性剂量估计
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application value of the two estimation methods in evaluating the radiation dose of adult chest CT
Objective To investigate the application value of CTDIvol and size-specific dose estimate(SSDE) in evaluating the radiation dose of adult chest CT. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the CTDIvoland SSDE of 128 patients who underwent chest CT scanning in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from March to April 2017 and all images are adequate for diagnosis. The subjects were divided into three groups according to body mass index (BMI): Group A, 38 cases with 16≤BMI<21.1 kg/m2; Group B, 53 cases with 21.1≤BMI<23.9 kg/m2; Group C, 37 cases with 23.9≤BMI<34.1 kg/m2. The diameters of anterior-posterior (AP) and left-right (LAT) of each patient were measured in the slice of nipple level, and CTDIvol, effective diameter (ED), conversion factor (fsize) and SSDE of each patient were recorded and calculated. Meanwhile, the differences between CTDIvol and SSDE in different BMI groups were compared. Results SSDE of each group was higher than CTDIvol, and increased by 50.13%, 42.83% and 33.68% in group A, B and C, respectively. There were significant differences in radiation dose between CTDIvol and SSDE in the three groups (t=-48.873, -57.001, -32.651, P<0.05). There were significant differences in ED, fsize, CTDIvol and SSDE among the three groups (F=51.456, 47.749, 113.916, 106.449, P<0.05). Conclusions SSDE can evaluate the radiation dose absorbed by patients with different body types in chest CT, while CTDIvol underestimated the radiation dose.The lower BMI, the greater the underestimated dose value, the more radiation dose absorbed. Key words: Radiation dose; Chest; CT; Size-specific dose estimate
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华放射医学与防护杂志
中华放射医学与防护杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6377
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信