基于CFD的水槽水力跃点位置的确定及与经验结果的比较https://doi.org/10.21698/rjeec.2020.211 P

A. Yıldız, A. İ. Marti, A. Yarar, V. Yılmaz
{"title":"基于CFD的水槽水力跃点位置的确定及与经验结果的比较https://doi.org/10.21698/rjeec.2020.211 P","authors":"A. Yıldız, A. İ. Marti, A. Yarar, V. Yılmaz","doi":"10.21698/rjeec.2020.211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dams and hydraulic structures are used for the supply and control of water, which have great importance on human life. The sluice gate is one of the hydraulic control structures. Sluice gates release excess water from the reservoir to the downstream side in a controlled manner with a certain discharge for controlling the level of the reservoir. A hydraulic jump is created to dissipate the energy of flow coming from under the gates. A hydraulic jump occurs when the flow regime is changed from subcritical to supercritical. However, the position of the hydraulic jump in the channel should be known exactly to prevent damage to surrounding structures. In this study, an open channel system with a sluice gate is used to produce a hydraulic jump. Experiments are conducted for two different gate openings (a1=1.5 cm and a2=2 cm) and 16 discharge values. For each case, the position of the hydraulic jump is determined. In addition, flow depths at 5 different points were measured including before and after the hydraulic jump. The results obtained from the experimental study were compared with the numerical model in terms of the position of hydraulic jump and flow depths. According to the results obtained, the numerical model and the physical model showed between 80 and 91% consistency.","PeriodicalId":21370,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Ecology & Environmental Chemistry","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of position of hydraulic jump in a flume by using CFD and comparison with experiential results https://doi.org/10.21698/rjeec.2020.211 P\",\"authors\":\"A. Yıldız, A. İ. Marti, A. Yarar, V. Yılmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.21698/rjeec.2020.211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dams and hydraulic structures are used for the supply and control of water, which have great importance on human life. The sluice gate is one of the hydraulic control structures. Sluice gates release excess water from the reservoir to the downstream side in a controlled manner with a certain discharge for controlling the level of the reservoir. A hydraulic jump is created to dissipate the energy of flow coming from under the gates. A hydraulic jump occurs when the flow regime is changed from subcritical to supercritical. However, the position of the hydraulic jump in the channel should be known exactly to prevent damage to surrounding structures. In this study, an open channel system with a sluice gate is used to produce a hydraulic jump. Experiments are conducted for two different gate openings (a1=1.5 cm and a2=2 cm) and 16 discharge values. For each case, the position of the hydraulic jump is determined. In addition, flow depths at 5 different points were measured including before and after the hydraulic jump. The results obtained from the experimental study were compared with the numerical model in terms of the position of hydraulic jump and flow depths. According to the results obtained, the numerical model and the physical model showed between 80 and 91% consistency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian Journal of Ecology & Environmental Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian Journal of Ecology & Environmental Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21698/rjeec.2020.211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Ecology & Environmental Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21698/rjeec.2020.211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

大坝和水工建筑物是用于供水和控制水的,对人类的生活有着重要的意义。水闸是水工控制结构的一种。水闸以一定的流量将水库多余的水有控制地释放到下游,以控制水库的水位。水力跃变是为了消散从闸门下流过的能量。当流动形式从亚临界转变为超临界时,就会发生水力跃变。但是,为了防止对周围构筑物的破坏,应准确地知道液压跃变在通道中的位置。在本研究中,使用一个带有闸门的明渠系统来产生水力跃变。实验针对两种不同的栅极开口(a1=1.5 cm和a2=2 cm)和16种放电值进行。对于每种情况,确定了液压跳的位置。此外,还测量了液压跃变前后5个不同点的流深。实验研究结果与数值模型在水跃位置和水流深度方面进行了比较。结果表明,数值模型与物理模型的一致性在80% ~ 91%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of position of hydraulic jump in a flume by using CFD and comparison with experiential results https://doi.org/10.21698/rjeec.2020.211 P
Dams and hydraulic structures are used for the supply and control of water, which have great importance on human life. The sluice gate is one of the hydraulic control structures. Sluice gates release excess water from the reservoir to the downstream side in a controlled manner with a certain discharge for controlling the level of the reservoir. A hydraulic jump is created to dissipate the energy of flow coming from under the gates. A hydraulic jump occurs when the flow regime is changed from subcritical to supercritical. However, the position of the hydraulic jump in the channel should be known exactly to prevent damage to surrounding structures. In this study, an open channel system with a sluice gate is used to produce a hydraulic jump. Experiments are conducted for two different gate openings (a1=1.5 cm and a2=2 cm) and 16 discharge values. For each case, the position of the hydraulic jump is determined. In addition, flow depths at 5 different points were measured including before and after the hydraulic jump. The results obtained from the experimental study were compared with the numerical model in terms of the position of hydraulic jump and flow depths. According to the results obtained, the numerical model and the physical model showed between 80 and 91% consistency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信