为什么在大型军事治疗设施中流感疫苗接种率低而百白破疫苗接种率平均?来自提供者和患者的调查结果

Heather Jinks, Megan E Pagan, Leighann Black, A. Adams, T. Plowden, E. Magann, K. Wilson
{"title":"为什么在大型军事治疗设施中流感疫苗接种率低而百白破疫苗接种率平均?来自提供者和患者的调查结果","authors":"Heather Jinks, Megan E Pagan, Leighann Black, A. Adams, T. Plowden, E. Magann, K. Wilson","doi":"10.15761/COGRM.1000322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The study objective was to determine why vaccination rates in a Military Treatment Facility, where patients have ready access to care at no cost, differ from the general population. Methods: Influenza and Tdap vaccination rates for pregnant women were analyzed at Womack Army Medical Center from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2018. Provider and patient surveys were conducted to evaluate barriers. All analyses were descriptive and conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC) or SPSS 25 (IBM Corp, Armock NY). Results: 9,448 pregnancies were included. The influenza vaccination rate was 36.7% and 56.4% for Tdap. Providers reported offering vaccinations at >90% of visits, whereas only 60% of patients reported being offered vaccination. 73.4% and 64.4% of patients declining vaccination reported the risks and benefits were not discussed for influenza and Tdap, respectively. Patients reported “provider recommendation” was the most important factor when choosing to receive vaccinations. Conclusion: Our influenza vaccination rate was lower and Tdap rate was average compared to the general population. The surveys suggest that provider and patient communication is a significant barrier to vaccination during pregnancy. Providers lending strong support to vaccinations during pregnancy and taking time to address concerns may be key to improving vaccination rates. *Correspondence to: Megan Pagan, MD, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, 4301 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA, E-mail: mpagan@uams.edu","PeriodicalId":87233,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why are influenza vaccination rates low and Tdap vaccination rates average in a large military treatment facility? Survey results from providers and patients\",\"authors\":\"Heather Jinks, Megan E Pagan, Leighann Black, A. Adams, T. Plowden, E. Magann, K. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/COGRM.1000322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The study objective was to determine why vaccination rates in a Military Treatment Facility, where patients have ready access to care at no cost, differ from the general population. Methods: Influenza and Tdap vaccination rates for pregnant women were analyzed at Womack Army Medical Center from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2018. Provider and patient surveys were conducted to evaluate barriers. All analyses were descriptive and conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC) or SPSS 25 (IBM Corp, Armock NY). Results: 9,448 pregnancies were included. The influenza vaccination rate was 36.7% and 56.4% for Tdap. Providers reported offering vaccinations at >90% of visits, whereas only 60% of patients reported being offered vaccination. 73.4% and 64.4% of patients declining vaccination reported the risks and benefits were not discussed for influenza and Tdap, respectively. Patients reported “provider recommendation” was the most important factor when choosing to receive vaccinations. Conclusion: Our influenza vaccination rate was lower and Tdap rate was average compared to the general population. The surveys suggest that provider and patient communication is a significant barrier to vaccination during pregnancy. Providers lending strong support to vaccinations during pregnancy and taking time to address concerns may be key to improving vaccination rates. *Correspondence to: Megan Pagan, MD, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, 4301 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA, E-mail: mpagan@uams.edu\",\"PeriodicalId\":87233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/COGRM.1000322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/COGRM.1000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定为什么在病人随时可以免费获得护理的军事治疗设施中,疫苗接种率与一般人群不同。方法:分析2015年10月1日至2018年9月30日沃马克陆军医疗中心孕妇流感和百白破疫苗接种率。对提供者和患者进行调查以评估障碍。所有的分析都是描述性的,使用SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC)或SPSS 25 (IBM Corp, Armock NY)进行。结果:共纳入9448例妊娠。流感接种率为36.7%,百白破接种率为56.4%。提供者报告在90%的就诊中提供疫苗接种,而只有60%的患者报告获得疫苗接种。73.4%和64.4%拒绝接种疫苗的患者分别报告未讨论流感和百白破疫苗的风险和益处。患者报告“提供者推荐”是选择接种疫苗时最重要的因素。结论:与普通人群相比,我市流感疫苗接种率较低,百日咳率处于平均水平。调查表明,提供者和患者的沟通是怀孕期间接种疫苗的一个重大障碍。提供者大力支持怀孕期间的疫苗接种,并花时间解决问题,这可能是提高疫苗接种率的关键。*通信对象:Megan Pagan,医学博士,阿肯色大学医学科学,妇产科,母胎医学部,4301 W。马克汉姆街,小石城,ar72202,美国,电子邮件:mpagan@uams.edu
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why are influenza vaccination rates low and Tdap vaccination rates average in a large military treatment facility? Survey results from providers and patients
Objective: The study objective was to determine why vaccination rates in a Military Treatment Facility, where patients have ready access to care at no cost, differ from the general population. Methods: Influenza and Tdap vaccination rates for pregnant women were analyzed at Womack Army Medical Center from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2018. Provider and patient surveys were conducted to evaluate barriers. All analyses were descriptive and conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC) or SPSS 25 (IBM Corp, Armock NY). Results: 9,448 pregnancies were included. The influenza vaccination rate was 36.7% and 56.4% for Tdap. Providers reported offering vaccinations at >90% of visits, whereas only 60% of patients reported being offered vaccination. 73.4% and 64.4% of patients declining vaccination reported the risks and benefits were not discussed for influenza and Tdap, respectively. Patients reported “provider recommendation” was the most important factor when choosing to receive vaccinations. Conclusion: Our influenza vaccination rate was lower and Tdap rate was average compared to the general population. The surveys suggest that provider and patient communication is a significant barrier to vaccination during pregnancy. Providers lending strong support to vaccinations during pregnancy and taking time to address concerns may be key to improving vaccination rates. *Correspondence to: Megan Pagan, MD, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, 4301 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA, E-mail: mpagan@uams.edu
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信