追踪动作的大小会影响学习结果吗?

IF 2.2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Felicity Galbraith, Paul Ginns
{"title":"追踪动作的大小会影响学习结果吗?","authors":"Felicity Galbraith, Paul Ginns","doi":"10.1080/20590776.2022.2161879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Explicit instructions to students to use the index finger to trace out specified elements of mathematics worked examples have been shown to improve mathematics learning outcomes; however, there is limited research on whether the magnitude of tracing actions impacts these outcomes. Method Using an experimental design, 34 adults were randomly allocated to an experimental (tracing out larger ellipses) or control (tracing out smaller ellipses) condition. We hypothesised explicit instructions to make larger tracing actions on the surface of worked examples on a mental mathematics skill would support learning more than making smaller tracing actions. Video analysis established the two conditions differed in distance traced in the expected direction. Results Contrary to hypotheses, making larger tracing actions did not result in better post-lesson problem-solving. Instead, an aptitude–treatment interaction was established between multiplication expertise and experimental condition, with less expert students in particular solving more similar post-test problems after making smaller tracing actions. This interaction may reflect a split-attention effect generated by experimental materials. Conclusions Findings suggest there needs to be close consideration of how instructions to trace lesson elements are designed, so that visual processing following the index finger supports rather than hinders learning. Directions for future research are discussed. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Worked examples are an effective learning format for novices to learn to solve problems. Making tracing actions on the surface of worked examples helps novices learn. Theory and research suggest larger actions may enhance learning. What this topic adds: Smaller tracing actions were more effective than larger tracing actions, particularly for less expert learners. This study establishes the importance of learner expertise in testing alternative tracing-based instructional designs. Instructional designers need to balance the design of traceable lesson elements with potential effects on visual processing.","PeriodicalId":44410,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","volume":"27 1","pages":"232 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the size of tracing actions affect learning outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"Felicity Galbraith, Paul Ginns\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20590776.2022.2161879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective Explicit instructions to students to use the index finger to trace out specified elements of mathematics worked examples have been shown to improve mathematics learning outcomes; however, there is limited research on whether the magnitude of tracing actions impacts these outcomes. Method Using an experimental design, 34 adults were randomly allocated to an experimental (tracing out larger ellipses) or control (tracing out smaller ellipses) condition. We hypothesised explicit instructions to make larger tracing actions on the surface of worked examples on a mental mathematics skill would support learning more than making smaller tracing actions. Video analysis established the two conditions differed in distance traced in the expected direction. Results Contrary to hypotheses, making larger tracing actions did not result in better post-lesson problem-solving. Instead, an aptitude–treatment interaction was established between multiplication expertise and experimental condition, with less expert students in particular solving more similar post-test problems after making smaller tracing actions. This interaction may reflect a split-attention effect generated by experimental materials. Conclusions Findings suggest there needs to be close consideration of how instructions to trace lesson elements are designed, so that visual processing following the index finger supports rather than hinders learning. Directions for future research are discussed. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Worked examples are an effective learning format for novices to learn to solve problems. Making tracing actions on the surface of worked examples helps novices learn. Theory and research suggest larger actions may enhance learning. What this topic adds: Smaller tracing actions were more effective than larger tracing actions, particularly for less expert learners. This study establishes the importance of learner expertise in testing alternative tracing-based instructional designs. Instructional designers need to balance the design of traceable lesson elements with potential effects on visual processing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational and Developmental Psychologist\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"232 - 243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational and Developmental Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2022.2161879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2022.2161879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的明确指导学生用食指描出数学例题中的特定元素,可以提高数学学习效果;然而,关于追踪行动的大小是否会影响这些结果的研究有限。方法采用实验设计,将34名成人随机分为实验组(画出较大椭圆)和对照组(画出较小椭圆)。我们假设明确的指示,在工作示例的表面上进行较大的跟踪操作,比进行较小的跟踪操作更有助于学习。视频分析表明,这两种情况在预期方向上追踪的距离不同。结果与假设相反,做更大的追踪动作并不能提高课后解决问题的能力。相反,在乘法技能和实验条件之间建立了一种能力-处理交互作用,特别是不太熟练的学生在做出较小的追踪动作后解决了更多类似的测试后问题。这种相互作用可能反映了实验材料产生的注意力分散效应。研究结果表明,需要密切考虑如何设计跟踪课程元素的指令,以使食指的视觉处理支持而不是阻碍学习。讨论了今后的研究方向。关于本主题的已知知识:工作示例是新手学习解决问题的有效学习形式。在工作示例的表面上进行跟踪操作有助于新手学习。理论和研究表明,更大的动作可能会促进学习。本主题补充的内容:较小的跟踪操作比较大的跟踪操作更有效,特别是对于不太专业的学习者。本研究确立了学习者专业知识在测试替代的基于跟踪的教学设计中的重要性。教学设计师需要平衡可追溯性课程元素的设计与对视觉处理的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the size of tracing actions affect learning outcomes?
ABSTRACT Objective Explicit instructions to students to use the index finger to trace out specified elements of mathematics worked examples have been shown to improve mathematics learning outcomes; however, there is limited research on whether the magnitude of tracing actions impacts these outcomes. Method Using an experimental design, 34 adults were randomly allocated to an experimental (tracing out larger ellipses) or control (tracing out smaller ellipses) condition. We hypothesised explicit instructions to make larger tracing actions on the surface of worked examples on a mental mathematics skill would support learning more than making smaller tracing actions. Video analysis established the two conditions differed in distance traced in the expected direction. Results Contrary to hypotheses, making larger tracing actions did not result in better post-lesson problem-solving. Instead, an aptitude–treatment interaction was established between multiplication expertise and experimental condition, with less expert students in particular solving more similar post-test problems after making smaller tracing actions. This interaction may reflect a split-attention effect generated by experimental materials. Conclusions Findings suggest there needs to be close consideration of how instructions to trace lesson elements are designed, so that visual processing following the index finger supports rather than hinders learning. Directions for future research are discussed. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Worked examples are an effective learning format for novices to learn to solve problems. Making tracing actions on the surface of worked examples helps novices learn. Theory and research suggest larger actions may enhance learning. What this topic adds: Smaller tracing actions were more effective than larger tracing actions, particularly for less expert learners. This study establishes the importance of learner expertise in testing alternative tracing-based instructional designs. Instructional designers need to balance the design of traceable lesson elements with potential effects on visual processing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational and Developmental Psychologist
Educational and Developmental Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Published biannually, this quality, peer-reviewed journal publishes psychological research that makes a substantial contribution to the knowledge and practice of education and developmental psychology. The broad aims are to provide a vehicle for dissemination of research that is of national and international significance to the researchers, practitioners and students of educational and developmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信