A. Serebrov, M. Chaikovskii, G. Klyushnikov, O. Zherebtsov, A. Chechkin
{"title":"寻找中子寿命异常的解释","authors":"A. Serebrov, M. Chaikovskii, G. Klyushnikov, O. Zherebtsov, A. Chechkin","doi":"10.1103/PHYSREVD.103.074010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All results of the neutron lifetime measurements performed in the last 20 years with the UCN storage method are in a good agreement. These results are also consistent with the latest most accurate measurements of the neutron decay asymmetry within the Standard Model. However, there is a significant discrepancy at $3.6\\sigma$ (1% of the decay probability) level between the averaged result of the storage method experiments and the most precise value obtained with the beam method. This article addresses the possible causes of that discrepancy. We focused on finding the spectrum of possible systematic corrections in the beam experiment. Four separate sources of the systematic errors which had not been properly addressed previously were considered. Two of those sources are related with the motion of protons in an electromagnetic field and the elastic scattering by the residual gas. These problems are associated with the geometrical configuration of the setup and the proton detector size. The Monte-Carlo simulation shows that these effects are negligible and do not affect measurement results. The third error concerns proton loss in the dead layer of the detector. It is shown that this correction requires a more detailed analysis than that given in the papers describing the beam measurement method. The fourth source of the systematic error is the charge exchange process on the residual gas. The influence of the residual gas was neglected in the beam method experiment. We present arguments that careful analysis of this issue is necessary since the proposed proton losses correction decreases the measured lifetime bringing it closer to the storage method results. Spectrum of possible corrections concerning this issue is investigated and it is shown that for the precise result, it is necessary to directly measure the concentration and composition of the residual gas inside the proton trap.","PeriodicalId":8464,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Nuclear Experiment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Search for explanation of the neutron lifetime anomaly\",\"authors\":\"A. Serebrov, M. Chaikovskii, G. Klyushnikov, O. Zherebtsov, A. Chechkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/PHYSREVD.103.074010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"All results of the neutron lifetime measurements performed in the last 20 years with the UCN storage method are in a good agreement. These results are also consistent with the latest most accurate measurements of the neutron decay asymmetry within the Standard Model. However, there is a significant discrepancy at $3.6\\\\sigma$ (1% of the decay probability) level between the averaged result of the storage method experiments and the most precise value obtained with the beam method. This article addresses the possible causes of that discrepancy. We focused on finding the spectrum of possible systematic corrections in the beam experiment. Four separate sources of the systematic errors which had not been properly addressed previously were considered. Two of those sources are related with the motion of protons in an electromagnetic field and the elastic scattering by the residual gas. These problems are associated with the geometrical configuration of the setup and the proton detector size. The Monte-Carlo simulation shows that these effects are negligible and do not affect measurement results. The third error concerns proton loss in the dead layer of the detector. It is shown that this correction requires a more detailed analysis than that given in the papers describing the beam measurement method. The fourth source of the systematic error is the charge exchange process on the residual gas. The influence of the residual gas was neglected in the beam method experiment. We present arguments that careful analysis of this issue is necessary since the proposed proton losses correction decreases the measured lifetime bringing it closer to the storage method results. Spectrum of possible corrections concerning this issue is investigated and it is shown that for the precise result, it is necessary to directly measure the concentration and composition of the residual gas inside the proton trap.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Nuclear Experiment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Nuclear Experiment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVD.103.074010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Nuclear Experiment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVD.103.074010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Search for explanation of the neutron lifetime anomaly
All results of the neutron lifetime measurements performed in the last 20 years with the UCN storage method are in a good agreement. These results are also consistent with the latest most accurate measurements of the neutron decay asymmetry within the Standard Model. However, there is a significant discrepancy at $3.6\sigma$ (1% of the decay probability) level between the averaged result of the storage method experiments and the most precise value obtained with the beam method. This article addresses the possible causes of that discrepancy. We focused on finding the spectrum of possible systematic corrections in the beam experiment. Four separate sources of the systematic errors which had not been properly addressed previously were considered. Two of those sources are related with the motion of protons in an electromagnetic field and the elastic scattering by the residual gas. These problems are associated with the geometrical configuration of the setup and the proton detector size. The Monte-Carlo simulation shows that these effects are negligible and do not affect measurement results. The third error concerns proton loss in the dead layer of the detector. It is shown that this correction requires a more detailed analysis than that given in the papers describing the beam measurement method. The fourth source of the systematic error is the charge exchange process on the residual gas. The influence of the residual gas was neglected in the beam method experiment. We present arguments that careful analysis of this issue is necessary since the proposed proton losses correction decreases the measured lifetime bringing it closer to the storage method results. Spectrum of possible corrections concerning this issue is investigated and it is shown that for the precise result, it is necessary to directly measure the concentration and composition of the residual gas inside the proton trap.