两种附着体对种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿微应变分析(体外研究)

Madiha Abo Goher, Zeinab El-Shorbagy, Zainab Abdul Aal
{"title":"两种附着体对种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿微应变分析(体外研究)","authors":"Madiha Abo Goher, Zeinab El-Shorbagy, Zainab Abdul Aal","doi":"10.4103/tdj.tdj_41_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The aim of this work is to evaluate strain analysis of two piece implants retained complete edentulous mandibular overdenture with two different attachment systems bar and clip attachment and extracoronal resilient attachment (ERA + bar) by using strain gauge analysis. Materials and Methods This in vitro strain analysis of implants retained complete mandibular overdenture with two attachments carried out on two completely edentulous mandibular models covered by 2 mm thickness mucosa. Two finished dentures were constructed one denture for each group. Group 1: two implants at canine region with bar attachment. Group 2: two implants at canine region with bar and ERA attachments. Four strain gauges were cemented around each implant, buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal. A 50 N static load was applied on the experimental model in vertical and oblique directions. Strain data of each group was collected tabulated and statically analyzed. Results The result of this study revealed that the difference of microstrain between the two groups was significant as the maximum microstrain recorded was found in group 1 followed by group 2. The oblique forces increase the resulting strain than vertical forces. Conclusion There are different patterns of strain analysis at bone–implant interface between the studied attachment designs, the ERA-bar combination exhibited better strain analysis than bar-clip system","PeriodicalId":22324,"journal":{"name":"Tanta Dental Journal","volume":"177 1","pages":"84 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microstrain analysis of implants retained complete mandibular overdenture by using two different attachments (an in vitro study)\",\"authors\":\"Madiha Abo Goher, Zeinab El-Shorbagy, Zainab Abdul Aal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tdj.tdj_41_19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The aim of this work is to evaluate strain analysis of two piece implants retained complete edentulous mandibular overdenture with two different attachment systems bar and clip attachment and extracoronal resilient attachment (ERA + bar) by using strain gauge analysis. Materials and Methods This in vitro strain analysis of implants retained complete mandibular overdenture with two attachments carried out on two completely edentulous mandibular models covered by 2 mm thickness mucosa. Two finished dentures were constructed one denture for each group. Group 1: two implants at canine region with bar attachment. Group 2: two implants at canine region with bar and ERA attachments. Four strain gauges were cemented around each implant, buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal. A 50 N static load was applied on the experimental model in vertical and oblique directions. Strain data of each group was collected tabulated and statically analyzed. Results The result of this study revealed that the difference of microstrain between the two groups was significant as the maximum microstrain recorded was found in group 1 followed by group 2. The oblique forces increase the resulting strain than vertical forces. Conclusion There are different patterns of strain analysis at bone–implant interface between the studied attachment designs, the ERA-bar combination exhibited better strain analysis than bar-clip system\",\"PeriodicalId\":22324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanta Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"84 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanta Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_41_19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanta Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_41_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的应用应变计分析两种不同附着体(棒夹附着体)和冠外弹性附着体(ERA +棒)的下颌覆盖义齿的应变分析。材料与方法在2个覆盖厚度为2mm的全颌无牙模型上,对种植体保留下颌双附着体覆盖义齿进行体外应变分析。每组1个义齿,制作2个义齿。组1:犬区种植体2枚,棒状附着。第二组:犬区种植体2枚,配以棒状和ERA附着体。四个应变片粘接在每个种植体周围,颊,舌,中,远端。实验模型在垂直和斜向上分别施加50 N静载荷。将各组应变数据制成表格并进行统计学分析。结果本研究结果显示,两组之间的微应变差异显著,1组记录的微应变最大,2组次之。斜向力比垂直力增加了产生的应变。结论不同的附着体设计在骨-种植体界面处具有不同的应变分析模式,ERA-bar组合比bar-clip系统具有更好的应变分析效果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microstrain analysis of implants retained complete mandibular overdenture by using two different attachments (an in vitro study)
Purpose The aim of this work is to evaluate strain analysis of two piece implants retained complete edentulous mandibular overdenture with two different attachment systems bar and clip attachment and extracoronal resilient attachment (ERA + bar) by using strain gauge analysis. Materials and Methods This in vitro strain analysis of implants retained complete mandibular overdenture with two attachments carried out on two completely edentulous mandibular models covered by 2 mm thickness mucosa. Two finished dentures were constructed one denture for each group. Group 1: two implants at canine region with bar attachment. Group 2: two implants at canine region with bar and ERA attachments. Four strain gauges were cemented around each implant, buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal. A 50 N static load was applied on the experimental model in vertical and oblique directions. Strain data of each group was collected tabulated and statically analyzed. Results The result of this study revealed that the difference of microstrain between the two groups was significant as the maximum microstrain recorded was found in group 1 followed by group 2. The oblique forces increase the resulting strain than vertical forces. Conclusion There are different patterns of strain analysis at bone–implant interface between the studied attachment designs, the ERA-bar combination exhibited better strain analysis than bar-clip system
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信