突发性空间稀缺下的多标准课程模式选择与课堂布置

Mehran Navabi-Shirazi, Mohamed El Tonbari, N. Boland, D. Nazzal, L. Steimle
{"title":"突发性空间稀缺下的多标准课程模式选择与课堂布置","authors":"Mehran Navabi-Shirazi, Mohamed El Tonbari, N. Boland, D. Nazzal, L. Steimle","doi":"10.1287/msom.2022.1131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: Although physical (or “social”) distancing is an important public health intervention during airborne pandemics, physical distancing dramatically reduces the effective capacity of classrooms. Academic/practical relevance: During the COVID-19 pandemic, this presented a unique problem to campus planners who hoped to deliver a meaningful amount of in-person instruction in a way that respected physical distancing. This process involved (1) assigning a mode to each offered class as remote, residential (in-person), or hybrid and (2) reassigning classrooms under severely reduced capacities to the non-remote classes. These decisions need to be made quickly and under several constraints and competing priorities, such as restrictions on changes to the timetable of classes, trade-offs between classroom density and educational benefits of in-person versus online instruction, and administrative preferences for course modes and classrooms reassignments. Methodology: We solve a flexible integer program and use hierarchical optimization to handle the multiple criteria according to priorities. We apply our methods using actual Georgia Institute of Technology (GT) student registration data, COVID-19–adjusted classroom and laboratory capacities, and departmental course mode delivery preferences. We generate optimal classroom assignments for all GT classes at the Atlanta campus and quantify the trade-offs among the competing priorities. Results: When classroom capacities decreased to 20%–25% of their normal seating capacities, optimization afforded students 15.5% more in-person contact hours compared with no room reassignments (NRRs). Among sections with an in-person preference, our model satisfies 87% of mode preferences, whereas only 47% are satisfied under NRR. Additionally, in a scenario in which all classes are preferred to be delivered in person, our model can satisfy 90% of mode preferences compared with 37% under NRR. Managerial implications: Multiobjective optimization is well suited for classroom assignment problems that campus planners usually manage sequentially and manually. Our models are computationally efficient and flexible, with the ability to handle multiple objectives with different priorities and build a new class-classrooms assignment or optimize an existing one, and they can apply under normal or sudden capacity scarcity constraints.","PeriodicalId":18108,"journal":{"name":"Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.","volume":"32 1","pages":"3252-3268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicriteria Course Mode Selection and Classroom Assignment Under Sudden Space Scarcity\",\"authors\":\"Mehran Navabi-Shirazi, Mohamed El Tonbari, N. Boland, D. Nazzal, L. Steimle\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/msom.2022.1131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problem definition: Although physical (or “social”) distancing is an important public health intervention during airborne pandemics, physical distancing dramatically reduces the effective capacity of classrooms. Academic/practical relevance: During the COVID-19 pandemic, this presented a unique problem to campus planners who hoped to deliver a meaningful amount of in-person instruction in a way that respected physical distancing. This process involved (1) assigning a mode to each offered class as remote, residential (in-person), or hybrid and (2) reassigning classrooms under severely reduced capacities to the non-remote classes. These decisions need to be made quickly and under several constraints and competing priorities, such as restrictions on changes to the timetable of classes, trade-offs between classroom density and educational benefits of in-person versus online instruction, and administrative preferences for course modes and classrooms reassignments. Methodology: We solve a flexible integer program and use hierarchical optimization to handle the multiple criteria according to priorities. We apply our methods using actual Georgia Institute of Technology (GT) student registration data, COVID-19–adjusted classroom and laboratory capacities, and departmental course mode delivery preferences. We generate optimal classroom assignments for all GT classes at the Atlanta campus and quantify the trade-offs among the competing priorities. Results: When classroom capacities decreased to 20%–25% of their normal seating capacities, optimization afforded students 15.5% more in-person contact hours compared with no room reassignments (NRRs). Among sections with an in-person preference, our model satisfies 87% of mode preferences, whereas only 47% are satisfied under NRR. Additionally, in a scenario in which all classes are preferred to be delivered in person, our model can satisfy 90% of mode preferences compared with 37% under NRR. Managerial implications: Multiobjective optimization is well suited for classroom assignment problems that campus planners usually manage sequentially and manually. Our models are computationally efficient and flexible, with the ability to handle multiple objectives with different priorities and build a new class-classrooms assignment or optimize an existing one, and they can apply under normal or sudden capacity scarcity constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"3252-3268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

问题定义:虽然物理(或“社会”)距离是在空气传播大流行病期间一项重要的公共卫生干预措施,但物理距离大大降低了教室的有效容量。学术/实践相关性:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,这给校园规划者带来了一个独特的问题,他们希望以尊重身体距离的方式提供有意义的面对面指导。这个过程包括:(1)为每个提供的班级分配一种模式,如远程、住宿(面对面)或混合模式;(2)将容量严重减少的教室重新分配给非远程班级。这些决定需要在一些限制和竞争的优先事项下迅速做出,例如对课程时间表的限制,课堂密度和面对面教学与在线教学的教育效益之间的权衡,以及课程模式和教室重新分配的行政偏好。方法:我们求解一个灵活的整数程序,并根据优先级使用分层优化来处理多个标准。我们使用佐治亚理工学院(GT)的实际学生注册数据、covid -19调整后的教室和实验室能力以及院系课程模式交付偏好来应用我们的方法。我们为亚特兰大校区的所有GT课程生成最佳课堂作业,并量化竞争优先级之间的权衡。结果:当教室容量减少到正常座位容量的20%-25%时,与没有房间重新分配(NRRs)相比,优化为学生提供了15.5%的面对面接触时间。在具有面对面偏好的部分中,我们的模型满足了87%的模式偏好,而在NRR下只有47%的模式满意。此外,在所有课程都倾向于亲自授课的场景中,我们的模型可以满足90%的模式偏好,而在NRR下为37%。管理意义:多目标优化非常适合校园规划者通常顺序和手动管理的课堂分配问题。我们的模型具有计算效率和灵活性,能够处理具有不同优先级的多个目标,并建立新的班级-教室分配或优化现有的分配,并且它们可以应用于正常或突然的容量稀缺约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicriteria Course Mode Selection and Classroom Assignment Under Sudden Space Scarcity
Problem definition: Although physical (or “social”) distancing is an important public health intervention during airborne pandemics, physical distancing dramatically reduces the effective capacity of classrooms. Academic/practical relevance: During the COVID-19 pandemic, this presented a unique problem to campus planners who hoped to deliver a meaningful amount of in-person instruction in a way that respected physical distancing. This process involved (1) assigning a mode to each offered class as remote, residential (in-person), or hybrid and (2) reassigning classrooms under severely reduced capacities to the non-remote classes. These decisions need to be made quickly and under several constraints and competing priorities, such as restrictions on changes to the timetable of classes, trade-offs between classroom density and educational benefits of in-person versus online instruction, and administrative preferences for course modes and classrooms reassignments. Methodology: We solve a flexible integer program and use hierarchical optimization to handle the multiple criteria according to priorities. We apply our methods using actual Georgia Institute of Technology (GT) student registration data, COVID-19–adjusted classroom and laboratory capacities, and departmental course mode delivery preferences. We generate optimal classroom assignments for all GT classes at the Atlanta campus and quantify the trade-offs among the competing priorities. Results: When classroom capacities decreased to 20%–25% of their normal seating capacities, optimization afforded students 15.5% more in-person contact hours compared with no room reassignments (NRRs). Among sections with an in-person preference, our model satisfies 87% of mode preferences, whereas only 47% are satisfied under NRR. Additionally, in a scenario in which all classes are preferred to be delivered in person, our model can satisfy 90% of mode preferences compared with 37% under NRR. Managerial implications: Multiobjective optimization is well suited for classroom assignment problems that campus planners usually manage sequentially and manually. Our models are computationally efficient and flexible, with the ability to handle multiple objectives with different priorities and build a new class-classrooms assignment or optimize an existing one, and they can apply under normal or sudden capacity scarcity constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信