ILLiad版权:问题与答案

Q3 Social Sciences
T. Christenson
{"title":"ILLiad版权:问题与答案","authors":"T. Christenson","doi":"10.1080/1072303X.2019.1616030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article analyzes how OCLC’s Interlibrary Loan Internet Accessible Database (ILLiad) software handles copyright compliance. Research conducted at one institution identified errors in the 2016 system generated report. The entire data set for articles was extracted for articles for the calendar year 2017. In running the ILLiad copyright report, a number of transactions were identified that should not have been included based on the National Commission on New Technology Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU) guidelines. These transactions had been submitted to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) for payment. The report was generated following the OCLC and Atlas Systems Incorporated guidelines. The objective of the research was to identify how the report was configured and identify any issues that may be a direct result of the ILLiad or report software in comparison to title 17, section 108 of the United States Code and the CONTU guidelines. Subsection 108(g) (2) of the bill identifies, among other things, limits on interlibrary understandings for photocopying. It prohibits systematic photocopying of copyrighted materials but allows interlibrary arrangements for the library that receives copies as long as there are not so many that they would replace a subscription to the publication.","PeriodicalId":35376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ILLiad Copyright: Issues and Answers\",\"authors\":\"T. Christenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1072303X.2019.1616030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article analyzes how OCLC’s Interlibrary Loan Internet Accessible Database (ILLiad) software handles copyright compliance. Research conducted at one institution identified errors in the 2016 system generated report. The entire data set for articles was extracted for articles for the calendar year 2017. In running the ILLiad copyright report, a number of transactions were identified that should not have been included based on the National Commission on New Technology Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU) guidelines. These transactions had been submitted to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) for payment. The report was generated following the OCLC and Atlas Systems Incorporated guidelines. The objective of the research was to identify how the report was configured and identify any issues that may be a direct result of the ILLiad or report software in comparison to title 17, section 108 of the United States Code and the CONTU guidelines. Subsection 108(g) (2) of the bill identifies, among other things, limits on interlibrary understandings for photocopying. It prohibits systematic photocopying of copyrighted materials but allows interlibrary arrangements for the library that receives copies as long as there are not so many that they would replace a subscription to the publication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1072303X.2019.1616030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1072303X.2019.1616030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文分析了OCLC的馆际互借互联网可访问数据库(ILLiad)软件如何处理版权合规问题。在一家机构进行的研究发现了2016年系统生成报告中的错误。文章的整个数据集被提取为2017日历年的文章。在编写ILLiad版权报告时,根据国家版权作品新技术使用委员会(CONTU)的指导方针,确定了一些本不应包括在内的交易。这些交易已提交给版权结算中心(CCC)付款。该报告是根据OCLC和Atlas Systems Incorporated的指导方针生成的。研究的目的是确定报告是如何配置的,并确定与美国法典第17篇第108节和CONTU准则相比,ILLiad或报告软件可能直接导致的任何问题。该法案第108(g)(2)小节明确了馆际间对复印的理解的限制。它禁止有系统地复印受版权保护的材料,但允许接收副本的图书馆进行馆际安排,只要数量不至于多到取代对出版物的订阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ILLiad Copyright: Issues and Answers
Abstract This article analyzes how OCLC’s Interlibrary Loan Internet Accessible Database (ILLiad) software handles copyright compliance. Research conducted at one institution identified errors in the 2016 system generated report. The entire data set for articles was extracted for articles for the calendar year 2017. In running the ILLiad copyright report, a number of transactions were identified that should not have been included based on the National Commission on New Technology Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU) guidelines. These transactions had been submitted to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) for payment. The report was generated following the OCLC and Atlas Systems Incorporated guidelines. The objective of the research was to identify how the report was configured and identify any issues that may be a direct result of the ILLiad or report software in comparison to title 17, section 108 of the United States Code and the CONTU guidelines. Subsection 108(g) (2) of the bill identifies, among other things, limits on interlibrary understandings for photocopying. It prohibits systematic photocopying of copyrighted materials but allows interlibrary arrangements for the library that receives copies as long as there are not so many that they would replace a subscription to the publication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve
Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The peer reviewed Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve is the only North American journal devoted to interlibrary loan, document delivery, and electronic reserve librarianship. While other journals in reference services and academic librarianship occasionally publish articles on interlibrary loan or electronic reserve, this unique journal publishes over half of all articles on these topics. These important articles are a mix of practice and theory. Retitled from the Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply to reflect the expansion of its focus to include electronic reserve, the Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve marks a clear direction to make the journal even more useful to all libraries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信