{"title":"ILLiad版权:问题与答案","authors":"T. Christenson","doi":"10.1080/1072303X.2019.1616030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article analyzes how OCLC’s Interlibrary Loan Internet Accessible Database (ILLiad) software handles copyright compliance. Research conducted at one institution identified errors in the 2016 system generated report. The entire data set for articles was extracted for articles for the calendar year 2017. In running the ILLiad copyright report, a number of transactions were identified that should not have been included based on the National Commission on New Technology Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU) guidelines. These transactions had been submitted to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) for payment. The report was generated following the OCLC and Atlas Systems Incorporated guidelines. The objective of the research was to identify how the report was configured and identify any issues that may be a direct result of the ILLiad or report software in comparison to title 17, section 108 of the United States Code and the CONTU guidelines. Subsection 108(g) (2) of the bill identifies, among other things, limits on interlibrary understandings for photocopying. It prohibits systematic photocopying of copyrighted materials but allows interlibrary arrangements for the library that receives copies as long as there are not so many that they would replace a subscription to the publication.","PeriodicalId":35376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ILLiad Copyright: Issues and Answers\",\"authors\":\"T. Christenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1072303X.2019.1616030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article analyzes how OCLC’s Interlibrary Loan Internet Accessible Database (ILLiad) software handles copyright compliance. Research conducted at one institution identified errors in the 2016 system generated report. The entire data set for articles was extracted for articles for the calendar year 2017. In running the ILLiad copyright report, a number of transactions were identified that should not have been included based on the National Commission on New Technology Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU) guidelines. These transactions had been submitted to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) for payment. The report was generated following the OCLC and Atlas Systems Incorporated guidelines. The objective of the research was to identify how the report was configured and identify any issues that may be a direct result of the ILLiad or report software in comparison to title 17, section 108 of the United States Code and the CONTU guidelines. Subsection 108(g) (2) of the bill identifies, among other things, limits on interlibrary understandings for photocopying. It prohibits systematic photocopying of copyrighted materials but allows interlibrary arrangements for the library that receives copies as long as there are not so many that they would replace a subscription to the publication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1072303X.2019.1616030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1072303X.2019.1616030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文分析了OCLC的馆际互借互联网可访问数据库(ILLiad)软件如何处理版权合规问题。在一家机构进行的研究发现了2016年系统生成报告中的错误。文章的整个数据集被提取为2017日历年的文章。在编写ILLiad版权报告时,根据国家版权作品新技术使用委员会(CONTU)的指导方针,确定了一些本不应包括在内的交易。这些交易已提交给版权结算中心(CCC)付款。该报告是根据OCLC和Atlas Systems Incorporated的指导方针生成的。研究的目的是确定报告是如何配置的,并确定与美国法典第17篇第108节和CONTU准则相比,ILLiad或报告软件可能直接导致的任何问题。该法案第108(g)(2)小节明确了馆际间对复印的理解的限制。它禁止有系统地复印受版权保护的材料,但允许接收副本的图书馆进行馆际安排,只要数量不至于多到取代对出版物的订阅。
Abstract This article analyzes how OCLC’s Interlibrary Loan Internet Accessible Database (ILLiad) software handles copyright compliance. Research conducted at one institution identified errors in the 2016 system generated report. The entire data set for articles was extracted for articles for the calendar year 2017. In running the ILLiad copyright report, a number of transactions were identified that should not have been included based on the National Commission on New Technology Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU) guidelines. These transactions had been submitted to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) for payment. The report was generated following the OCLC and Atlas Systems Incorporated guidelines. The objective of the research was to identify how the report was configured and identify any issues that may be a direct result of the ILLiad or report software in comparison to title 17, section 108 of the United States Code and the CONTU guidelines. Subsection 108(g) (2) of the bill identifies, among other things, limits on interlibrary understandings for photocopying. It prohibits systematic photocopying of copyrighted materials but allows interlibrary arrangements for the library that receives copies as long as there are not so many that they would replace a subscription to the publication.
期刊介绍:
The peer reviewed Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve is the only North American journal devoted to interlibrary loan, document delivery, and electronic reserve librarianship. While other journals in reference services and academic librarianship occasionally publish articles on interlibrary loan or electronic reserve, this unique journal publishes over half of all articles on these topics. These important articles are a mix of practice and theory. Retitled from the Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply to reflect the expansion of its focus to include electronic reserve, the Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve marks a clear direction to make the journal even more useful to all libraries.