在印度尼西亚作为预审诉讼的基础:在Formil或材料之间

P. Setiawan, Xavier Nugraha, M. Taufiqurrohman
{"title":"在印度尼西亚作为预审诉讼的基础:在Formil或材料之间","authors":"P. Setiawan, Xavier Nugraha, M. Taufiqurrohman","doi":"10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to answer what is the scope of pretrial in statutory regulations and whether expiration can be used as an excuse to file a pretrial lawsuit. By using legal research methods through statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this article concludes that the absence of a clear categorization regarding the formal and material aspects of the expiration case creates a dilemma. In its development, expiration has begun to be recognized as a formal reason which incidentally does not touch the subject matter of the case, an thus can be used as a pretrial excuse. This can be seen in the Pre-trial Decision Number: 143/Pid.Prap/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel. Ultimately, this article suggests the need for a clear regulation in the Perma regarding the categorization of formal and material aspects in pretrial hearings.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penggunaan Daluwarsa sebagai Dasar Gugatan Praperadilan di Indonesia: Antara Formil atau Materiil\",\"authors\":\"P. Setiawan, Xavier Nugraha, M. Taufiqurrohman\",\"doi\":\"10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to answer what is the scope of pretrial in statutory regulations and whether expiration can be used as an excuse to file a pretrial lawsuit. By using legal research methods through statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this article concludes that the absence of a clear categorization regarding the formal and material aspects of the expiration case creates a dilemma. In its development, expiration has begun to be recognized as a formal reason which incidentally does not touch the subject matter of the case, an thus can be used as a pretrial excuse. This can be seen in the Pre-trial Decision Number: 143/Pid.Prap/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel. Ultimately, this article suggests the need for a clear regulation in the Perma regarding the categorization of formal and material aspects in pretrial hearings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volksgeist\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volksgeist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volksgeist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文旨在回答法律规定的审前范围是什么,过期是否可以作为提起审前诉讼的理由。通过使用法律研究方法,通过法定、概念和基于案例的方法,本文得出结论,关于到期案件的形式和物质方面缺乏明确的分类造成了一个困境。在其发展过程中,期满已开始被认为是一种偶然不触及案件主题的形式理由,因此可以用作审前借口。这可以在预审决定编号:143/Pid.Prap/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel中看到。最后,本文建议有必要在《宪法》中明确规定审前听证的正式方面和实质性方面的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Penggunaan Daluwarsa sebagai Dasar Gugatan Praperadilan di Indonesia: Antara Formil atau Materiil
This article aims to answer what is the scope of pretrial in statutory regulations and whether expiration can be used as an excuse to file a pretrial lawsuit. By using legal research methods through statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this article concludes that the absence of a clear categorization regarding the formal and material aspects of the expiration case creates a dilemma. In its development, expiration has begun to be recognized as a formal reason which incidentally does not touch the subject matter of the case, an thus can be used as a pretrial excuse. This can be seen in the Pre-trial Decision Number: 143/Pid.Prap/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel. Ultimately, this article suggests the need for a clear regulation in the Perma regarding the categorization of formal and material aspects in pretrial hearings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信