fpga是否陷入了创新者的困境?

Vaughn Betz, J. Cong
{"title":"fpga是否陷入了创新者的困境?","authors":"Vaughn Betz, J. Cong","doi":"10.1145/2435264.2435289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"FPGAs constitute a highly profitable industry, with approximately $5 billion of sales per year. High barriers to entry keep most companies away, and enable high profit margins for the incumbents. The industry has grown greatly over the years, but still constitutes a small portion of the overall semiconductor market. This raises the question to be addressed by this panel: is the FPGA community innovating as much as it should, or is a bias to maintain high profit margins and protect the cash flow of the current FPGA market holding us back from exploring new ideas and products that could greatly expand the appeal of and market for FPGA-related technology? This would be a classic case of the innovator's dilemma defined by Clayton Christensen: it is difficult for a company to engage in creative destruction of a cash cow product.\n Our distinguished panel of experts will discuss whether we are seeing major innovation in architectures, design flows and applications, or only incremental improvements. We will also discuss if any new (possibly low margin) application domain is left out by the FPGA industry, what radical ideas should be explored, and whether large incumbents, new startups, academia or some combination are best able to attack these new areas.","PeriodicalId":87257,"journal":{"name":"FPGA. ACM International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays","volume":"42 1","pages":"135-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are FPGAs suffering from the innovator's dilemna?\",\"authors\":\"Vaughn Betz, J. Cong\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2435264.2435289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"FPGAs constitute a highly profitable industry, with approximately $5 billion of sales per year. High barriers to entry keep most companies away, and enable high profit margins for the incumbents. The industry has grown greatly over the years, but still constitutes a small portion of the overall semiconductor market. This raises the question to be addressed by this panel: is the FPGA community innovating as much as it should, or is a bias to maintain high profit margins and protect the cash flow of the current FPGA market holding us back from exploring new ideas and products that could greatly expand the appeal of and market for FPGA-related technology? This would be a classic case of the innovator's dilemma defined by Clayton Christensen: it is difficult for a company to engage in creative destruction of a cash cow product.\\n Our distinguished panel of experts will discuss whether we are seeing major innovation in architectures, design flows and applications, or only incremental improvements. We will also discuss if any new (possibly low margin) application domain is left out by the FPGA industry, what radical ideas should be explored, and whether large incumbents, new startups, academia or some combination are best able to attack these new areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FPGA. ACM International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"135-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FPGA. ACM International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2435264.2435289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FPGA. ACM International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2435264.2435289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

fpga构成了一个高利润的行业,每年的销售额约为50亿美元。高进入门槛使大多数公司望而却步,并为现有企业提供了高利润率。多年来,该行业增长迅速,但仍只占整个半导体市场的一小部分。这就提出了这个小组要解决的问题:FPGA社区是否应该尽可能多地创新,或者是保持高利润率和保护当前FPGA市场的现金流的偏见阻碍了我们探索新的想法和产品,这些新想法和产品可以极大地扩大FPGA相关技术的吸引力和市场?这将是克莱顿•克里斯滕森(Clayton Christensen)定义的创新者困境的典型案例:一家公司很难对一种摇钱树产品进行创造性破坏。我们杰出的专家小组将讨论我们是否看到了架构、设计流程和应用程序方面的重大创新,或者只是渐进式的改进。我们还将讨论FPGA行业是否遗漏了任何新的(可能是低利润的)应用领域,应该探索哪些激进的想法,以及大型现有企业、新创业公司、学术界或某些组合是否最能攻击这些新领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are FPGAs suffering from the innovator's dilemna?
FPGAs constitute a highly profitable industry, with approximately $5 billion of sales per year. High barriers to entry keep most companies away, and enable high profit margins for the incumbents. The industry has grown greatly over the years, but still constitutes a small portion of the overall semiconductor market. This raises the question to be addressed by this panel: is the FPGA community innovating as much as it should, or is a bias to maintain high profit margins and protect the cash flow of the current FPGA market holding us back from exploring new ideas and products that could greatly expand the appeal of and market for FPGA-related technology? This would be a classic case of the innovator's dilemma defined by Clayton Christensen: it is difficult for a company to engage in creative destruction of a cash cow product. Our distinguished panel of experts will discuss whether we are seeing major innovation in architectures, design flows and applications, or only incremental improvements. We will also discuss if any new (possibly low margin) application domain is left out by the FPGA industry, what radical ideas should be explored, and whether large incumbents, new startups, academia or some combination are best able to attack these new areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信