{"title":"多器官功能障碍综合征的静态和动态预负荷指标","authors":"S. Marghli, S. Nouira","doi":"10.1080/17471060701281949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, early optimization of cardiac preload is required to improve outcome. This review describes available static and dynamic indices used as bedside indicators of cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Static indices (mostly derived from a pulmonary artery catheter or echocardiography) are based on measurements of cardiac pressures and volumes. Dynamic indices are based on a functional assessment of the pressure–volume relationship and the heart–lung interaction. Available data demonstrated that dynamic indices such as pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation were more reliable predictors of fluid responsiveness than static indices. Dynamic indices using non-invasive devices are also proposed and it is expected that they will be used more often in future. However, spontaneous breathing movements and arrhythmia are the major limitations to the use of dynamic indices in clinical practice. In this respect, new volumet...","PeriodicalId":89424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of organ dysfunction","volume":"731 1","pages":"22-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Static and dynamic preload indicators in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome\",\"authors\":\"S. Marghli, S. Nouira\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17471060701281949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, early optimization of cardiac preload is required to improve outcome. This review describes available static and dynamic indices used as bedside indicators of cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Static indices (mostly derived from a pulmonary artery catheter or echocardiography) are based on measurements of cardiac pressures and volumes. Dynamic indices are based on a functional assessment of the pressure–volume relationship and the heart–lung interaction. Available data demonstrated that dynamic indices such as pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation were more reliable predictors of fluid responsiveness than static indices. Dynamic indices using non-invasive devices are also proposed and it is expected that they will be used more often in future. However, spontaneous breathing movements and arrhythmia are the major limitations to the use of dynamic indices in clinical practice. In this respect, new volumet...\",\"PeriodicalId\":89424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of organ dysfunction\",\"volume\":\"731 1\",\"pages\":\"22-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of organ dysfunction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17471060701281949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of organ dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17471060701281949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Static and dynamic preload indicators in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
In patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, early optimization of cardiac preload is required to improve outcome. This review describes available static and dynamic indices used as bedside indicators of cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Static indices (mostly derived from a pulmonary artery catheter or echocardiography) are based on measurements of cardiac pressures and volumes. Dynamic indices are based on a functional assessment of the pressure–volume relationship and the heart–lung interaction. Available data demonstrated that dynamic indices such as pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation were more reliable predictors of fluid responsiveness than static indices. Dynamic indices using non-invasive devices are also proposed and it is expected that they will be used more often in future. However, spontaneous breathing movements and arrhythmia are the major limitations to the use of dynamic indices in clinical practice. In this respect, new volumet...