内容多样性比较可以改善IQA

William Thong, José Costa Pereira, Sarah Parisot, A. Leonardis, Steven G. McDonagh
{"title":"内容多样性比较可以改善IQA","authors":"William Thong, José Costa Pereira, Sarah Parisot, A. Leonardis, Steven G. McDonagh","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2211.05215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image quality assessment (IQA) forms a natural and often straightforward undertaking for humans, yet effective automation of the task remains highly challenging. Recent metrics from the deep learning community commonly compare image pairs during training to improve upon traditional metrics such as PSNR or SSIM. However, current comparisons ignore the fact that image content affects quality assessment as comparisons only occur between images of similar content. This restricts the diversity and number of image pairs that the model is exposed to during training. In this paper, we strive to enrich these comparisons with content diversity. Firstly, we relax comparison constraints, and compare pairs of images with differing content. This increases the variety of available comparisons. Secondly, we introduce listwise comparisons to provide a holistic view to the model. By including differentiable regularizers, derived from correlation coefficients, models can better adjust predicted scores relative to one another. Evaluation on multiple benchmarks, covering a wide range of distortions and image content, shows the effectiveness of our learning scheme for training image quality assessment models.","PeriodicalId":72437,"journal":{"name":"BMVC : proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference. British Machine Vision Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content-Diverse Comparisons improve IQA\",\"authors\":\"William Thong, José Costa Pereira, Sarah Parisot, A. Leonardis, Steven G. McDonagh\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2211.05215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Image quality assessment (IQA) forms a natural and often straightforward undertaking for humans, yet effective automation of the task remains highly challenging. Recent metrics from the deep learning community commonly compare image pairs during training to improve upon traditional metrics such as PSNR or SSIM. However, current comparisons ignore the fact that image content affects quality assessment as comparisons only occur between images of similar content. This restricts the diversity and number of image pairs that the model is exposed to during training. In this paper, we strive to enrich these comparisons with content diversity. Firstly, we relax comparison constraints, and compare pairs of images with differing content. This increases the variety of available comparisons. Secondly, we introduce listwise comparisons to provide a holistic view to the model. By including differentiable regularizers, derived from correlation coefficients, models can better adjust predicted scores relative to one another. Evaluation on multiple benchmarks, covering a wide range of distortions and image content, shows the effectiveness of our learning scheme for training image quality assessment models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMVC : proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference. British Machine Vision Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMVC : proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference. British Machine Vision Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.05215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMVC : proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference. British Machine Vision Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.05215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

图像质量评估(IQA)对人类来说是一项自然而直接的任务,但有效的自动化任务仍然具有很高的挑战性。来自深度学习社区的最新指标通常在训练期间比较图像对,以改进传统指标,如PSNR或SSIM。然而,目前的比较忽略了图像内容影响质量评估的事实,因为比较只发生在内容相似的图像之间。这限制了模型在训练过程中所接触到的图像对的多样性和数量。在本文中,我们力求通过内容多样性来丰富这些比较。首先,我们放宽比较约束,对不同内容的图像进行比较。这增加了可用比较的多样性。其次,我们引入了列表比较,以提供对模型的整体视图。通过包含从相关系数推导出来的可微正则,模型可以更好地调整相对于另一个的预测分数。在多个基准上的评估,涵盖了广泛的失真和图像内容,表明了我们的学习方案在训练图像质量评估模型方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Content-Diverse Comparisons improve IQA
Image quality assessment (IQA) forms a natural and often straightforward undertaking for humans, yet effective automation of the task remains highly challenging. Recent metrics from the deep learning community commonly compare image pairs during training to improve upon traditional metrics such as PSNR or SSIM. However, current comparisons ignore the fact that image content affects quality assessment as comparisons only occur between images of similar content. This restricts the diversity and number of image pairs that the model is exposed to during training. In this paper, we strive to enrich these comparisons with content diversity. Firstly, we relax comparison constraints, and compare pairs of images with differing content. This increases the variety of available comparisons. Secondly, we introduce listwise comparisons to provide a holistic view to the model. By including differentiable regularizers, derived from correlation coefficients, models can better adjust predicted scores relative to one another. Evaluation on multiple benchmarks, covering a wide range of distortions and image content, shows the effectiveness of our learning scheme for training image quality assessment models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信