石油工程教育的再评估:是一个时代的结束还是一个新的开始?

T. Babadagli
{"title":"石油工程教育的再评估:是一个时代的结束还是一个新的开始?","authors":"T. Babadagli","doi":"10.2118/205964-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since emerging more than a century ago, petroleum engineering (PE) education has increasingly kept its popularity despite significant downturns in the industry. During these downturn periods, observed at least four times since the 1973 oil crisis, structural changes in university programs have been considered. On the other hand, during the \"heyday\" periods, institutions have had to tackle enormous demand from industry, severely increased enrollments, and reestablish resources to provide a proper service. In light of these observations and while experiencing the fifth downturn period over the last five decades, it is time again to ask the same question: \"Shall we continue with the same PE education model or radically shift to a new model?\"\n In this paper, after reviewing more than fifty articles published over the last 85 years reporting the attempts made towards reshaping PE education, an option of restructuring PE programs is discussed. This option is less oil industry (and oil prices) dependent and more of a \"general\" engineering education program with an emphasis on the \"geoscience\" or \"subsurface\" engineering aspects of the PE discipline. Detailed discussions focus on curriculum updates to address the industry practice of \"subsurface\" related engineering applications. Viability of this option was discussed from industry, academia, and students’ perspective.\n This restructuring option requires substantial changes to curricula, skill development, and teaching and learning styles. Fundamentals are essential to include in PE education similar to other general (or major) engineering disciplines such as mechanical, civil, chemical, and electrical engineering. The essential elements of engineering skills such as creative design, decision making, problem description and solving, management under high degree of uncertainty, and data collection and processing for optimization are to be included in the new model. Finally, the model proposed is critically discussed and analyzed from different perspectives (industry, academia, and students) considering current and prospected subsurface engineering applications.","PeriodicalId":10965,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021","volume":"17 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassessment of Petroleum Engineering Education: Is It the End of an Era or a New Start?\",\"authors\":\"T. Babadagli\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/205964-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Since emerging more than a century ago, petroleum engineering (PE) education has increasingly kept its popularity despite significant downturns in the industry. During these downturn periods, observed at least four times since the 1973 oil crisis, structural changes in university programs have been considered. On the other hand, during the \\\"heyday\\\" periods, institutions have had to tackle enormous demand from industry, severely increased enrollments, and reestablish resources to provide a proper service. In light of these observations and while experiencing the fifth downturn period over the last five decades, it is time again to ask the same question: \\\"Shall we continue with the same PE education model or radically shift to a new model?\\\"\\n In this paper, after reviewing more than fifty articles published over the last 85 years reporting the attempts made towards reshaping PE education, an option of restructuring PE programs is discussed. This option is less oil industry (and oil prices) dependent and more of a \\\"general\\\" engineering education program with an emphasis on the \\\"geoscience\\\" or \\\"subsurface\\\" engineering aspects of the PE discipline. Detailed discussions focus on curriculum updates to address the industry practice of \\\"subsurface\\\" related engineering applications. Viability of this option was discussed from industry, academia, and students’ perspective.\\n This restructuring option requires substantial changes to curricula, skill development, and teaching and learning styles. Fundamentals are essential to include in PE education similar to other general (or major) engineering disciplines such as mechanical, civil, chemical, and electrical engineering. The essential elements of engineering skills such as creative design, decision making, problem description and solving, management under high degree of uncertainty, and data collection and processing for optimization are to be included in the new model. Finally, the model proposed is critically discussed and analyzed from different perspectives (industry, academia, and students) considering current and prospected subsurface engineering applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021\",\"volume\":\"17 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/205964-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205964-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

石油工程(PE)教育自一个多世纪前兴起以来,尽管行业形势严重低迷,但仍越来越受欢迎。在这些低迷时期,自1973年石油危机以来至少出现了四次,大学课程的结构性变化已经被考虑过。另一方面,在“全盛时期”,院校不得不应对来自工业界的巨大需求,大幅增加招生人数,并重新建立资源以提供适当的服务。鉴于这些观察结果,在经历了过去50年的第五次低迷时期后,是时候再次提出同样的问题了:“我们是继续沿用同样的体育教育模式,还是从根本上转向一种新的模式?”在本文中,在回顾了过去85年来发表的关于重塑体育教育的尝试的50多篇文章之后,讨论了重组体育课程的选择。这种选择较少依赖于石油行业(和石油价格),更多的是“一般”工程教育计划,重点是体育学科的“地球科学”或“地下”工程方面。详细的讨论集中在课程更新上,以解决“地下”相关工程应用的行业实践。从工业界、学术界和学生的角度讨论了这一选择的可行性。这种重组需要对课程、技能发展以及教学方式进行实质性的改变。基础知识与其他一般(或专业)工程学科(如机械、土木、化学和电气工程)一样,是体育教育必不可少的。工程技能的基本要素,如创造性设计、决策、问题描述和解决、高度不确定性下的管理、数据收集和优化处理,都将包括在新的模型中。最后,考虑到当前和未来的地下工程应用,从不同的角度(工业界、学术界和学生)对所提出的模型进行了批判性的讨论和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reassessment of Petroleum Engineering Education: Is It the End of an Era or a New Start?
Since emerging more than a century ago, petroleum engineering (PE) education has increasingly kept its popularity despite significant downturns in the industry. During these downturn periods, observed at least four times since the 1973 oil crisis, structural changes in university programs have been considered. On the other hand, during the "heyday" periods, institutions have had to tackle enormous demand from industry, severely increased enrollments, and reestablish resources to provide a proper service. In light of these observations and while experiencing the fifth downturn period over the last five decades, it is time again to ask the same question: "Shall we continue with the same PE education model or radically shift to a new model?" In this paper, after reviewing more than fifty articles published over the last 85 years reporting the attempts made towards reshaping PE education, an option of restructuring PE programs is discussed. This option is less oil industry (and oil prices) dependent and more of a "general" engineering education program with an emphasis on the "geoscience" or "subsurface" engineering aspects of the PE discipline. Detailed discussions focus on curriculum updates to address the industry practice of "subsurface" related engineering applications. Viability of this option was discussed from industry, academia, and students’ perspective. This restructuring option requires substantial changes to curricula, skill development, and teaching and learning styles. Fundamentals are essential to include in PE education similar to other general (or major) engineering disciplines such as mechanical, civil, chemical, and electrical engineering. The essential elements of engineering skills such as creative design, decision making, problem description and solving, management under high degree of uncertainty, and data collection and processing for optimization are to be included in the new model. Finally, the model proposed is critically discussed and analyzed from different perspectives (industry, academia, and students) considering current and prospected subsurface engineering applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信