颈部催眠手术:基于患者自我评估的评价

M. Jaouen, V. Parent, M. Codet, V. Gérard, A. Chatellier-Miras, Cécile Chaize, O. de Crouy Chanel, F. Jegoux
{"title":"颈部催眠手术:基于患者自我评估的评价","authors":"M. Jaouen, V. Parent, M. Codet, V. Gérard, A. Chatellier-Miras, Cécile Chaize, O. de Crouy Chanel, F. Jegoux","doi":"10.1177/0003489419882445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Surgery with hypnosis avoids the use of general anesthesia (GA). It also shortens hospitalization and promotes outpatient surgery. The objective of this study has been to assess the satisfaction of operated patients. No previous study has focused on patient satisfaction in a prospective design. Methods: In this prospective, non-randomized, observational study, all patients operated with hypnosis between 2009 and 2017 in the Ear, Nose, and Throat department of a tertiary care hospital were selected. All patients were asked to fill a questionnaire based on a previously validated questionnaire incremented with complementary questions. Questionnaires were completed immediately after surgery for 31 patients and after 6 months for 20 patients. Global Satisfaction Index (GSI) was self-assessed on a scale ranging from 1 to 10. Patients were asked; whether they felt comfortable during the operation, whether hypnosis helped them, whether the experience matched their expectations, whether they would revisit or recommend it to someone else and whether they considered to have been sufficiently informed before the procedure. The data was analyzed using a linear regression model with P < .05 considered as statistically significant. Results: During the inclusion period, no patient required conversion to GA. A total of 48 questionnaires were evaluated. The median of the GSI was 8/10. GSI significantly correlated with patient comfort (P < 0.0001) and quality of preoperative information (P = .002). The percentage of patients who found hypnosis helpful correlated with the duration of surgery (P = .04). The probability for a patient to consider hypnosis as an experience matching their expectation increased with surgical team experience OR 0.55 (0.3-0.9). Conclusion: This study reveals that patients’ global satisfaction after hypnosis is high. This is significantly related to the quality of preoperative information and to the experience of the surgical team. It also suggests that patients are more likely to benefit from hypnosis if the surgery is longer.","PeriodicalId":8361,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","volume":"44 1","pages":"256 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neck Surgery with Hypnosis: An Evaluation Based Upon Patient’s Self Assessment\",\"authors\":\"M. Jaouen, V. Parent, M. Codet, V. Gérard, A. Chatellier-Miras, Cécile Chaize, O. de Crouy Chanel, F. Jegoux\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0003489419882445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Surgery with hypnosis avoids the use of general anesthesia (GA). It also shortens hospitalization and promotes outpatient surgery. The objective of this study has been to assess the satisfaction of operated patients. No previous study has focused on patient satisfaction in a prospective design. Methods: In this prospective, non-randomized, observational study, all patients operated with hypnosis between 2009 and 2017 in the Ear, Nose, and Throat department of a tertiary care hospital were selected. All patients were asked to fill a questionnaire based on a previously validated questionnaire incremented with complementary questions. Questionnaires were completed immediately after surgery for 31 patients and after 6 months for 20 patients. Global Satisfaction Index (GSI) was self-assessed on a scale ranging from 1 to 10. Patients were asked; whether they felt comfortable during the operation, whether hypnosis helped them, whether the experience matched their expectations, whether they would revisit or recommend it to someone else and whether they considered to have been sufficiently informed before the procedure. The data was analyzed using a linear regression model with P < .05 considered as statistically significant. Results: During the inclusion period, no patient required conversion to GA. A total of 48 questionnaires were evaluated. The median of the GSI was 8/10. GSI significantly correlated with patient comfort (P < 0.0001) and quality of preoperative information (P = .002). The percentage of patients who found hypnosis helpful correlated with the duration of surgery (P = .04). The probability for a patient to consider hypnosis as an experience matching their expectation increased with surgical team experience OR 0.55 (0.3-0.9). Conclusion: This study reveals that patients’ global satisfaction after hypnosis is high. This is significantly related to the quality of preoperative information and to the experience of the surgical team. It also suggests that patients are more likely to benefit from hypnosis if the surgery is longer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"256 - 264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419882445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419882445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:催眠手术避免了全身麻醉(GA)的使用。它还缩短了住院时间,促进了门诊手术。本研究的目的是评估手术患者的满意度。以前没有研究在前瞻性设计中关注患者满意度。方法:在这项前瞻性、非随机、观察性研究中,选择2009年至2017年在某三级医院耳鼻喉科接受催眠手术的所有患者。所有患者都被要求填写一份问卷,该问卷基于先前验证的问卷,并增加了补充问题。31例患者术后立即填写问卷,20例患者术后6个月填写问卷。全球满意度指数(GSI)是在1到10的范围内自行评估的。病人被问到;他们在手术过程中是否感到舒适,催眠是否对他们有帮助,这种经历是否符合他们的期望,他们是否会重新审视或推荐给其他人,他们是否认为在手术前已经充分了解了情况。采用P <的线性回归模型对数据进行分析。0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:在纳入期间,没有患者需要转化为GA。共评估了48份问卷。GSI的中位数为8/10。GSI与患者舒适度(P < 0.0001)和术前信息质量(P = 0.002)显著相关。发现催眠有帮助的患者百分比与手术时间相关(P = .04)。患者将催眠视为符合其期望的经历的概率随着手术团队经验OR 0.55(0.3-0.9)的增加而增加。结论:本研究显示催眠后患者整体满意度较高。这与术前信息的质量和手术团队的经验密切相关。研究还表明,如果手术时间较长,患者更有可能从催眠中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neck Surgery with Hypnosis: An Evaluation Based Upon Patient’s Self Assessment
Background: Surgery with hypnosis avoids the use of general anesthesia (GA). It also shortens hospitalization and promotes outpatient surgery. The objective of this study has been to assess the satisfaction of operated patients. No previous study has focused on patient satisfaction in a prospective design. Methods: In this prospective, non-randomized, observational study, all patients operated with hypnosis between 2009 and 2017 in the Ear, Nose, and Throat department of a tertiary care hospital were selected. All patients were asked to fill a questionnaire based on a previously validated questionnaire incremented with complementary questions. Questionnaires were completed immediately after surgery for 31 patients and after 6 months for 20 patients. Global Satisfaction Index (GSI) was self-assessed on a scale ranging from 1 to 10. Patients were asked; whether they felt comfortable during the operation, whether hypnosis helped them, whether the experience matched their expectations, whether they would revisit or recommend it to someone else and whether they considered to have been sufficiently informed before the procedure. The data was analyzed using a linear regression model with P < .05 considered as statistically significant. Results: During the inclusion period, no patient required conversion to GA. A total of 48 questionnaires were evaluated. The median of the GSI was 8/10. GSI significantly correlated with patient comfort (P < 0.0001) and quality of preoperative information (P = .002). The percentage of patients who found hypnosis helpful correlated with the duration of surgery (P = .04). The probability for a patient to consider hypnosis as an experience matching their expectation increased with surgical team experience OR 0.55 (0.3-0.9). Conclusion: This study reveals that patients’ global satisfaction after hypnosis is high. This is significantly related to the quality of preoperative information and to the experience of the surgical team. It also suggests that patients are more likely to benefit from hypnosis if the surgery is longer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信