动态风险评估-工地事故的全局分析

E. Umeh
{"title":"动态风险评估-工地事故的全局分析","authors":"E. Umeh","doi":"10.2118/198779-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The industry is in constant research with consistent efforts to ensure that the no/less incidents occur during the course of operations. Notable and popular slogans/rules have been adopted among engineering and oil & gas organizations over the years in the industry to intimate the need for safe activities to be performed among staff. Slogans like Goal Zero, Golden Rule dictum, \"Safe…Yes we can\", Life Saving Rules, \"No Wahala…Take 5\" and many others have been used in recent times to inculcate the culture of safety and situational awareness in the mind of the work force. Tools like check cards, stickers, safety IDs and banners are also quick reminders of the environment being operated on.\n However while all these tools are fairly efficient, the need for proper risk assessment cannot be over-emphasized at all times before a job to be done can be certified safe. Worksite Tools like toolbox talk, last minute risk assessment (LMRA), Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) and post job debrief are veritable towards achieving this goal. But while risk assessment before the job commences is important, of equivalent or even much importance is the one conducted during the job and this is called dynamic risk assessment.\n This paper presents an approach and exposition of the risk assessment plan in the operations level in the oil and gas industry. It also discussed on the methods to be deployed a successful risk assessment and buttress further on static and dynamic risk assessment as it concerns operations in a gas process plant. A new conceptual risk assessment model has been developed. A case study was treated from Atabala Plant which is a gas processing facility in the south southern Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":11110,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic Risk Assessment – A MacGyverism to Worksite Incidents\",\"authors\":\"E. Umeh\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/198779-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The industry is in constant research with consistent efforts to ensure that the no/less incidents occur during the course of operations. Notable and popular slogans/rules have been adopted among engineering and oil & gas organizations over the years in the industry to intimate the need for safe activities to be performed among staff. Slogans like Goal Zero, Golden Rule dictum, \\\"Safe…Yes we can\\\", Life Saving Rules, \\\"No Wahala…Take 5\\\" and many others have been used in recent times to inculcate the culture of safety and situational awareness in the mind of the work force. Tools like check cards, stickers, safety IDs and banners are also quick reminders of the environment being operated on.\\n However while all these tools are fairly efficient, the need for proper risk assessment cannot be over-emphasized at all times before a job to be done can be certified safe. Worksite Tools like toolbox talk, last minute risk assessment (LMRA), Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) and post job debrief are veritable towards achieving this goal. But while risk assessment before the job commences is important, of equivalent or even much importance is the one conducted during the job and this is called dynamic risk assessment.\\n This paper presents an approach and exposition of the risk assessment plan in the operations level in the oil and gas industry. It also discussed on the methods to be deployed a successful risk assessment and buttress further on static and dynamic risk assessment as it concerns operations in a gas process plant. A new conceptual risk assessment model has been developed. A case study was treated from Atabala Plant which is a gas processing facility in the south southern Nigeria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/198779-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198779-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

油气行业一直在不断研究和努力,以确保在作业过程中不发生或减少事故。多年来,行业内的工程和油气组织采用了一些著名的口号/规则,以提醒员工进行安全活动的必要性。像“零目标”、“黄金法则”、“安全……是的,我们能做到”、“救生规则”、“不打Wahala……拿5块”这样的口号,以及其他许多口号,最近都被用来向员工灌输安全文化和情境意识。检查卡、贴纸、安全标识和横幅等工具也可以快速提醒正在操作的环境。然而,尽管所有这些工具都相当有效,但在完成工作之前,无论何时都不能过分强调进行适当的风险评估的必要性。现场工具,如工具箱谈话、最后一分钟风险评估(LMRA)、工作危害分析(JHA)和工作后汇报,都是实现这一目标的可靠工具。虽然工作开始前的风险评估很重要,但工作中进行的风险评估同样重要,甚至更重要,这被称为动态风险评估。本文对油气行业作业层面的风险评估方案进行了探讨和阐述。本文还讨论了成功进行风险评估的方法,并进一步支持了静态和动态风险评估,因为它涉及到天然气处理厂的操作。提出了一种新的概念性风险评估模型。案例研究来自阿塔巴拉工厂,这是尼日利亚南部的一个天然气处理设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic Risk Assessment – A MacGyverism to Worksite Incidents
The industry is in constant research with consistent efforts to ensure that the no/less incidents occur during the course of operations. Notable and popular slogans/rules have been adopted among engineering and oil & gas organizations over the years in the industry to intimate the need for safe activities to be performed among staff. Slogans like Goal Zero, Golden Rule dictum, "Safe…Yes we can", Life Saving Rules, "No Wahala…Take 5" and many others have been used in recent times to inculcate the culture of safety and situational awareness in the mind of the work force. Tools like check cards, stickers, safety IDs and banners are also quick reminders of the environment being operated on. However while all these tools are fairly efficient, the need for proper risk assessment cannot be over-emphasized at all times before a job to be done can be certified safe. Worksite Tools like toolbox talk, last minute risk assessment (LMRA), Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) and post job debrief are veritable towards achieving this goal. But while risk assessment before the job commences is important, of equivalent or even much importance is the one conducted during the job and this is called dynamic risk assessment. This paper presents an approach and exposition of the risk assessment plan in the operations level in the oil and gas industry. It also discussed on the methods to be deployed a successful risk assessment and buttress further on static and dynamic risk assessment as it concerns operations in a gas process plant. A new conceptual risk assessment model has been developed. A case study was treated from Atabala Plant which is a gas processing facility in the south southern Nigeria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信