西班牙国家卫生系统中心辅助生殖治疗的等候名单管理和优先标准

Ana Monzó , Ana Casas , Ana Belén Castel , Beatriz Gaspar , Plácido Llaneza , Bárbara Romero , Sara Peralta , M. Jesús Saiz , Clara Sanz
{"title":"西班牙国家卫生系统中心辅助生殖治疗的等候名单管理和优先标准","authors":"Ana Monzó ,&nbsp;Ana Casas ,&nbsp;Ana Belén Castel ,&nbsp;Beatriz Gaspar ,&nbsp;Plácido Llaneza ,&nbsp;Bárbara Romero ,&nbsp;Sara Peralta ,&nbsp;M. Jesús Saiz ,&nbsp;Clara Sanz","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2022.100113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In the current context, The National Health System Assisted Reproduction working teams need to coordinate themselves to ensure that the waiting list management is equitable and efficient avoiding great inequalities between centers. To this end, prioritization criteria must be protocolized and agreed according to quality standards, and these protocols must be followed with total transparency by all professionals. The aim of this study is to analyze with the Hanlon methodology different conditions that can be prioritized in assisted reproduction programs.</p><p>The National Health System Assisted Reproduction working teams need to coordinate themselves to ensure that the waiting list management is equitable and efficient avoiding great inequalities between centers.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A working group composed of 9 experts from public centers located in 7 autonomous communities have identified 14 conditions susceptible to prioritization by means of modal analysis through brainstorming. These conditions have been evaluated with the Hanlon methodology, scoring the magnitude, severity, feasibility and effectiveness of each condition, adapting the model to the specific circumstances. Based on the score obtained for each of the conditions, 4 levels of priority have been established and the maximum deadlines for their attention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Recently diagnosed oncological diseases in both, men and women should be given absolute priority, and procedures must be performed in less than one month. Urgent care (1–6 months) should be provided to people with oncological diseases who have overcome the disease and women over 39 years with low ovarian reserve. Less urgent care (6–9 months) is required for non-oncological diseases, endometriosis, and women aged over 39 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The health authorities should use this information when establishing maximum waiting times if the purpose is to maintain the equity of the public system.</p><p>Each assisted reproduction center should analyze the demanding care population and features in order to establish its self-prioritization systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 100113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gestión de la lista de espera y criterios de priorización en los tratamientos de reproducción asistida en los centros del Sistema Nacional de Salud de España\",\"authors\":\"Ana Monzó ,&nbsp;Ana Casas ,&nbsp;Ana Belén Castel ,&nbsp;Beatriz Gaspar ,&nbsp;Plácido Llaneza ,&nbsp;Bárbara Romero ,&nbsp;Sara Peralta ,&nbsp;M. Jesús Saiz ,&nbsp;Clara Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medre.2022.100113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In the current context, The National Health System Assisted Reproduction working teams need to coordinate themselves to ensure that the waiting list management is equitable and efficient avoiding great inequalities between centers. To this end, prioritization criteria must be protocolized and agreed according to quality standards, and these protocols must be followed with total transparency by all professionals. The aim of this study is to analyze with the Hanlon methodology different conditions that can be prioritized in assisted reproduction programs.</p><p>The National Health System Assisted Reproduction working teams need to coordinate themselves to ensure that the waiting list management is equitable and efficient avoiding great inequalities between centers.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A working group composed of 9 experts from public centers located in 7 autonomous communities have identified 14 conditions susceptible to prioritization by means of modal analysis through brainstorming. These conditions have been evaluated with the Hanlon methodology, scoring the magnitude, severity, feasibility and effectiveness of each condition, adapting the model to the specific circumstances. Based on the score obtained for each of the conditions, 4 levels of priority have been established and the maximum deadlines for their attention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Recently diagnosed oncological diseases in both, men and women should be given absolute priority, and procedures must be performed in less than one month. Urgent care (1–6 months) should be provided to people with oncological diseases who have overcome the disease and women over 39 years with low ovarian reserve. Less urgent care (6–9 months) is required for non-oncological diseases, endometriosis, and women aged over 39 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The health authorities should use this information when establishing maximum waiting times if the purpose is to maintain the equity of the public system.</p><p>Each assisted reproduction center should analyze the demanding care population and features in order to establish its self-prioritization systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932022000019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932022000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当前背景下,国家卫生系统辅助生殖工作小组需要相互协调,以确保等待名单管理的公平和高效,避免中心之间的巨大不平等。为此,必须根据质量标准制定优先级标准,并且所有专业人员必须以完全透明的方式遵循这些标准。本研究的目的是用汉龙方法分析辅助生殖计划中可以优先考虑的不同条件。国家卫生系统辅助生殖工作小组需要相互协调,以确保等待名单的管理是公平和有效的,避免中心之间的巨大不平等。材料和方法由来自7个自治区公共中心的9名专家组成的工作组通过头脑风暴,通过模态分析确定了14个易优先考虑的条件。使用Hanlon方法对这些条件进行了评估,对每个条件的大小、严重性、可行性和有效性进行了评分,并使模型适应具体情况。根据每个条件的得分,确定了4个优先级,并确定了注意这些优先级的最长期限。结果对近期确诊的肿瘤患者,不论男女,均应优先考虑,且手术时间应少于1个月。紧急护理(1-6 个月)应提供给已战胜疾病的肿瘤患者和39 岁以上卵巢储备功能低下的妇女。非肿瘤性疾病、子宫内膜异位症和年龄超过39 岁的妇女需要较少的紧急护理(6-9 个月)。结论:如果目的是维护公共系统的公平性,卫生当局在确定最长等待时间时应使用这些信息。各辅助生殖中心应分析需要护理的人群和特点,建立自己的优先级系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gestión de la lista de espera y criterios de priorización en los tratamientos de reproducción asistida en los centros del Sistema Nacional de Salud de España

Introduction

In the current context, The National Health System Assisted Reproduction working teams need to coordinate themselves to ensure that the waiting list management is equitable and efficient avoiding great inequalities between centers. To this end, prioritization criteria must be protocolized and agreed according to quality standards, and these protocols must be followed with total transparency by all professionals. The aim of this study is to analyze with the Hanlon methodology different conditions that can be prioritized in assisted reproduction programs.

The National Health System Assisted Reproduction working teams need to coordinate themselves to ensure that the waiting list management is equitable and efficient avoiding great inequalities between centers.

Material and methods

A working group composed of 9 experts from public centers located in 7 autonomous communities have identified 14 conditions susceptible to prioritization by means of modal analysis through brainstorming. These conditions have been evaluated with the Hanlon methodology, scoring the magnitude, severity, feasibility and effectiveness of each condition, adapting the model to the specific circumstances. Based on the score obtained for each of the conditions, 4 levels of priority have been established and the maximum deadlines for their attention.

Results

Recently diagnosed oncological diseases in both, men and women should be given absolute priority, and procedures must be performed in less than one month. Urgent care (1–6 months) should be provided to people with oncological diseases who have overcome the disease and women over 39 years with low ovarian reserve. Less urgent care (6–9 months) is required for non-oncological diseases, endometriosis, and women aged over 39 years.

Conclusions

The health authorities should use this information when establishing maximum waiting times if the purpose is to maintain the equity of the public system.

Each assisted reproduction center should analyze the demanding care population and features in order to establish its self-prioritization systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信