{"title":"普图马约橡胶繁荣时期的目击者描述","authors":"Rupert Medd, H. Guyot","doi":"10.3167/jys.2019.200204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between 1870 and 1915 Peru experienced a rubber-boom, extending into the Putumayo River region in 1893. This huge region of Amazonian forests was controlled by the Peruvian Amazon Company (P. A. Co.). Although Peruvian, they had British company directors and a British-Barbadian workforce. Their methods of extraction generated unimaginable degrees of human and ecological violence. Roger Casement, a British diplomat, was sent on a harrowing mission to investigate these allegations made by travelers. His Amazon Journal takes precedence; however, Peruvians also responded to the situation, reporting to the Geographical Society of Lima. Included are two forgotten yet influential Peruvian explorers: the geographer Manuel Antonio Mesones Muro and the engineer Cárlos Oyague y Calderón. By highlighting some of the early debates that circulated between Europe and Latin America on the natural resources and people of the Amazon forests, the focus is to draw out textual examples of perceptions on race, environment, and early consumer responsibility. Supported by coloniality/modernity theories, it also asks whether this form of travel writing was functioning as a resistance literature to imperialism for the time. Thus, this study investigates alternative readings that might also inform twenty-first-century scholars and activists as they articulate environmentalist and even social and ecological positions.","PeriodicalId":42316,"journal":{"name":"Journeys-The International Journal of Travel and Travel Writing","volume":"85 1","pages":"58-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eyewitness Accounts during the Putumayo Rubber Boom\",\"authors\":\"Rupert Medd, H. Guyot\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/jys.2019.200204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Between 1870 and 1915 Peru experienced a rubber-boom, extending into the Putumayo River region in 1893. This huge region of Amazonian forests was controlled by the Peruvian Amazon Company (P. A. Co.). Although Peruvian, they had British company directors and a British-Barbadian workforce. Their methods of extraction generated unimaginable degrees of human and ecological violence. Roger Casement, a British diplomat, was sent on a harrowing mission to investigate these allegations made by travelers. His Amazon Journal takes precedence; however, Peruvians also responded to the situation, reporting to the Geographical Society of Lima. Included are two forgotten yet influential Peruvian explorers: the geographer Manuel Antonio Mesones Muro and the engineer Cárlos Oyague y Calderón. By highlighting some of the early debates that circulated between Europe and Latin America on the natural resources and people of the Amazon forests, the focus is to draw out textual examples of perceptions on race, environment, and early consumer responsibility. Supported by coloniality/modernity theories, it also asks whether this form of travel writing was functioning as a resistance literature to imperialism for the time. Thus, this study investigates alternative readings that might also inform twenty-first-century scholars and activists as they articulate environmentalist and even social and ecological positions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journeys-The International Journal of Travel and Travel Writing\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"58-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journeys-The International Journal of Travel and Travel Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/jys.2019.200204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journeys-The International Journal of Travel and Travel Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/jys.2019.200204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
1870年至1915年间,秘鲁经历了橡胶业的繁荣,1893年延伸到普图马约河地区。这一大片亚马孙森林由秘鲁亚马逊公司(p.a. Co.)控制。虽然是秘鲁人,但他们有英国公司董事和英裔巴巴多斯劳动力。他们的开采方法造成了难以想象的人类和生态暴力。英国外交官罗杰·凯斯门特(Roger Casement)被派去调查这些旅客的指控,这是一项令人痛心的任务。他的《亚马逊日志》(Amazon Journal)占据了优先地位;然而,秘鲁人也对这种情况作出了反应,向利马地理学会报告。其中包括两位被遗忘但颇具影响力的秘鲁探险家:地理学家曼努埃尔·安东尼奥·梅索内斯·穆罗和工程师Cárlos Oyague y Calderón。通过突出一些早期在欧洲和拉丁美洲之间流传的关于亚马逊森林的自然资源和人民的辩论,重点是找出关于种族、环境和早期消费者责任的看法的文本例子。在殖民/现代性理论的支持下,它也质疑这种形式的旅行写作是否在当时作为一种抵抗帝国主义的文学。因此,本研究调查了另一种解读,这些解读也可能为21世纪的学者和活动家提供信息,因为他们阐明了环境主义者甚至社会和生态立场。
Eyewitness Accounts during the Putumayo Rubber Boom
Between 1870 and 1915 Peru experienced a rubber-boom, extending into the Putumayo River region in 1893. This huge region of Amazonian forests was controlled by the Peruvian Amazon Company (P. A. Co.). Although Peruvian, they had British company directors and a British-Barbadian workforce. Their methods of extraction generated unimaginable degrees of human and ecological violence. Roger Casement, a British diplomat, was sent on a harrowing mission to investigate these allegations made by travelers. His Amazon Journal takes precedence; however, Peruvians also responded to the situation, reporting to the Geographical Society of Lima. Included are two forgotten yet influential Peruvian explorers: the geographer Manuel Antonio Mesones Muro and the engineer Cárlos Oyague y Calderón. By highlighting some of the early debates that circulated between Europe and Latin America on the natural resources and people of the Amazon forests, the focus is to draw out textual examples of perceptions on race, environment, and early consumer responsibility. Supported by coloniality/modernity theories, it also asks whether this form of travel writing was functioning as a resistance literature to imperialism for the time. Thus, this study investigates alternative readings that might also inform twenty-first-century scholars and activists as they articulate environmentalist and even social and ecological positions.