新的非婚生子女:同居夫妇的孩子和继子女

C. Bowman
{"title":"新的非婚生子女:同居夫妇的孩子和继子女","authors":"C. Bowman","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/r3udz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONHistorically, illegitimate children were punished because their parents were unmarried. The children of opposite-sex cohabiting couples are disadvantaged in similar ways today,1 and, to a lesser extent, so are stepchildren. In another article, I have discussed the impact that the current state of family law, with respect to custody, visitation, and child support, has on impact upon these children.2 Significant problems with respect to each of these issues afflict stepchildren and children who live with a cohabiting couple, especially those who are the biological children of only one partner. In this Article, I direct my attention to the effect upon these children of current American law regarding inheritance, government benefits, and standing to bring a number of tort claims.As of the 2010 census, about 4,560,000 children lived in households headed by opposite-sex cohabiting couples, almost six percent of all children in the United States.3 About fifty-five percent of these children are the biological offspring of both cohabitants, and about forty-five percent are children of only one of the cohabitants-typically seventy-eight percent of the woman.4 The overall statistics differ dramatically by race and ethnic group.5 These families are also disproportionately found among lower-income households.6 Tellingly, many of the cases challenging laws classifying children on the basis of illegitimacy, including both Levy v. Louisiana7 and Labine v. Vincent,8 were brought by African American plaintiffs.9The situation of biological children of only one of two cohabitants is functionally identical to that of stepchildren, except that the unmarried stepparent is not legally obligated to support the child's parent. Many scholars believe that the distinction between stepchildren whose parents are married and those whose parents are unmarried makes little real difference and should be disregarded.10 Social scientific studies of stepchildren and cohabitants' children support this conclusion. Married or unmarried, stepparents are a varied group-male and female, having their own children from previous unions or not, more and less close to their stepchildren.11 The quality of a stepparent-stepchild relationship varies with the age of the child at the time of the remarriage or beginning of cohabitation and the length of time the two have lived together.12 Some stepparents become very involved in the lives of their stepchildren, virtually replacing the noncustodial biological parent,13 while others remain distanced from their partner's child; the second scenario is especially common if the child was an adolescent when the stepparent moved in.14 The relationships between children and stepparents differ in a variety of ways from the relationships children have with biological parents with whom they have lived since birth, but studies have shown that stepchildren share these differences with children of cohabitants.15In my previous article, I focused on potential and probable harms experienced by some of these children if their biological parent dies or separates from the other cohabitant or stepparent. If the biological parent dies, current law would typically remove their partner's children from the household in which they have been living, and place them in the custody of their noncustodial parent or other relatives. This potentially separates the children from their primary caretaker, from the home and neighborhood with which they are familiar, and from step- or half-siblings they have regarded as family, 16 with no presumptive right to visitation. A similar result is likely to occur if the adults separate, with particularly harmful consequences if the non-biological parent has been the child's primary caretaker.17 Moreover, if the child's parent and his or her married or cohabiting stepparent separate, sudden economic disaster may befall the child, who has no right to child support from the ex-cohabitant, even if both child and parent have depended upon the cohabitant's income. …","PeriodicalId":87421,"journal":{"name":"The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The New Illegitimacy: Children of Cohabiting Couples and Stepchildren\",\"authors\":\"C. Bowman\",\"doi\":\"10.31228/osf.io/r3udz\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTIONHistorically, illegitimate children were punished because their parents were unmarried. The children of opposite-sex cohabiting couples are disadvantaged in similar ways today,1 and, to a lesser extent, so are stepchildren. In another article, I have discussed the impact that the current state of family law, with respect to custody, visitation, and child support, has on impact upon these children.2 Significant problems with respect to each of these issues afflict stepchildren and children who live with a cohabiting couple, especially those who are the biological children of only one partner. In this Article, I direct my attention to the effect upon these children of current American law regarding inheritance, government benefits, and standing to bring a number of tort claims.As of the 2010 census, about 4,560,000 children lived in households headed by opposite-sex cohabiting couples, almost six percent of all children in the United States.3 About fifty-five percent of these children are the biological offspring of both cohabitants, and about forty-five percent are children of only one of the cohabitants-typically seventy-eight percent of the woman.4 The overall statistics differ dramatically by race and ethnic group.5 These families are also disproportionately found among lower-income households.6 Tellingly, many of the cases challenging laws classifying children on the basis of illegitimacy, including both Levy v. Louisiana7 and Labine v. Vincent,8 were brought by African American plaintiffs.9The situation of biological children of only one of two cohabitants is functionally identical to that of stepchildren, except that the unmarried stepparent is not legally obligated to support the child's parent. Many scholars believe that the distinction between stepchildren whose parents are married and those whose parents are unmarried makes little real difference and should be disregarded.10 Social scientific studies of stepchildren and cohabitants' children support this conclusion. Married or unmarried, stepparents are a varied group-male and female, having their own children from previous unions or not, more and less close to their stepchildren.11 The quality of a stepparent-stepchild relationship varies with the age of the child at the time of the remarriage or beginning of cohabitation and the length of time the two have lived together.12 Some stepparents become very involved in the lives of their stepchildren, virtually replacing the noncustodial biological parent,13 while others remain distanced from their partner's child; the second scenario is especially common if the child was an adolescent when the stepparent moved in.14 The relationships between children and stepparents differ in a variety of ways from the relationships children have with biological parents with whom they have lived since birth, but studies have shown that stepchildren share these differences with children of cohabitants.15In my previous article, I focused on potential and probable harms experienced by some of these children if their biological parent dies or separates from the other cohabitant or stepparent. If the biological parent dies, current law would typically remove their partner's children from the household in which they have been living, and place them in the custody of their noncustodial parent or other relatives. This potentially separates the children from their primary caretaker, from the home and neighborhood with which they are familiar, and from step- or half-siblings they have regarded as family, 16 with no presumptive right to visitation. A similar result is likely to occur if the adults separate, with particularly harmful consequences if the non-biological parent has been the child's primary caretaker.17 Moreover, if the child's parent and his or her married or cohabiting stepparent separate, sudden economic disaster may befall the child, who has no right to child support from the ex-cohabitant, even if both child and parent have depended upon the cohabitant's income. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":87421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/r3udz\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/r3udz","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

历史上,私生子因为父母未婚而受到惩罚。如今,异性同居夫妇的孩子也以类似的方式处于不利地位,继子女也是如此,只是程度较轻。在另一篇文章中,我讨论了家庭法的现状对这些孩子的影响,包括监护权、探视权和子女抚养费这些问题都困扰着继子女和与同居夫妇生活在一起的孩子,尤其是那些只有一方亲生的孩子。在这篇文章中,我将把注意力集中在现行美国法律对这些儿童的影响上,这些法律涉及继承权、政府福利以及提起一系列侵权索赔的资格。根据2010年的人口普查,大约有4560000名儿童生活在以异性同居夫妇为户主的家庭中,几乎占美国所有儿童的6%,其中大约55%的儿童是同居者双方的亲生子女,大约45%的儿童是同居者中只有一方的孩子——通常是78%的女性根据种族和民族的不同,总的统计数字差别很大这些家庭也不成比例地出现在低收入家庭中引人注目的是,许多挑战法律依据私生子身份对儿童进行分类的案件,包括利维诉路易斯安那州案和拉宾诉文森特案,都是由非裔美国原告提起的。同居双方中只有一方的亲生子女的情况与继子女的情况在功能上是相同的,只是未婚的继父母没有法律义务赡养孩子的父母。许多学者认为,父母已婚的继子女和父母未婚的继子女之间的区别并没有什么真正的区别,应该忽略不计对继子女和同居子女的社会科学研究支持这一结论。无论是已婚还是未婚,继父母都是一个不同的群体——有男有女,或有或没有与前妻生过自己的孩子,或多或少与继子女关系密切继父母-继子女关系的质量随再婚或同居时孩子的年龄以及两人共同生活的时间长短而变化有些继父母对继子女的生活介入甚深,实际上取代了无监护权的亲生父母13,而另一些则与伴侣的孩子保持距离;如果继父母搬进来的时候孩子还是个青少年,第二种情况尤其常见孩子与继父母之间的关系在很多方面都不同于孩子与自出生以来就生活在一起的亲生父母之间的关系,但研究表明,继子女与同居者的子女之间存在这些差异。在我之前的文章中,我关注的是,如果这些孩子的亲生父母去世或与另一位同居父母或继父母分居,他们可能会受到的潜在伤害。如果亲生父母去世,现行法律通常会将其伴侣的孩子从他们一直居住的家庭中带走,并将他们置于无监护权的父母或其他亲属的监护下。这可能会使孩子们与他们的主要看护人、他们熟悉的家庭和邻居、以及他们视为家人的同父异母或同父异母兄弟姐妹分开,因为他们没有假定的探视权。如果成年人分开,可能会出现类似的结果,如果非亲生父母一直是孩子的主要照顾者,后果尤其有害此外,如果孩子的父母与已婚或同居的继父母分居,孩子可能会遭遇突如其来的经济灾难,即使孩子和父母都依赖于同居人的收入,孩子也无权从前同居人那里获得子女抚养费。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The New Illegitimacy: Children of Cohabiting Couples and Stepchildren
INTRODUCTIONHistorically, illegitimate children were punished because their parents were unmarried. The children of opposite-sex cohabiting couples are disadvantaged in similar ways today,1 and, to a lesser extent, so are stepchildren. In another article, I have discussed the impact that the current state of family law, with respect to custody, visitation, and child support, has on impact upon these children.2 Significant problems with respect to each of these issues afflict stepchildren and children who live with a cohabiting couple, especially those who are the biological children of only one partner. In this Article, I direct my attention to the effect upon these children of current American law regarding inheritance, government benefits, and standing to bring a number of tort claims.As of the 2010 census, about 4,560,000 children lived in households headed by opposite-sex cohabiting couples, almost six percent of all children in the United States.3 About fifty-five percent of these children are the biological offspring of both cohabitants, and about forty-five percent are children of only one of the cohabitants-typically seventy-eight percent of the woman.4 The overall statistics differ dramatically by race and ethnic group.5 These families are also disproportionately found among lower-income households.6 Tellingly, many of the cases challenging laws classifying children on the basis of illegitimacy, including both Levy v. Louisiana7 and Labine v. Vincent,8 were brought by African American plaintiffs.9The situation of biological children of only one of two cohabitants is functionally identical to that of stepchildren, except that the unmarried stepparent is not legally obligated to support the child's parent. Many scholars believe that the distinction between stepchildren whose parents are married and those whose parents are unmarried makes little real difference and should be disregarded.10 Social scientific studies of stepchildren and cohabitants' children support this conclusion. Married or unmarried, stepparents are a varied group-male and female, having their own children from previous unions or not, more and less close to their stepchildren.11 The quality of a stepparent-stepchild relationship varies with the age of the child at the time of the remarriage or beginning of cohabitation and the length of time the two have lived together.12 Some stepparents become very involved in the lives of their stepchildren, virtually replacing the noncustodial biological parent,13 while others remain distanced from their partner's child; the second scenario is especially common if the child was an adolescent when the stepparent moved in.14 The relationships between children and stepparents differ in a variety of ways from the relationships children have with biological parents with whom they have lived since birth, but studies have shown that stepchildren share these differences with children of cohabitants.15In my previous article, I focused on potential and probable harms experienced by some of these children if their biological parent dies or separates from the other cohabitant or stepparent. If the biological parent dies, current law would typically remove their partner's children from the household in which they have been living, and place them in the custody of their noncustodial parent or other relatives. This potentially separates the children from their primary caretaker, from the home and neighborhood with which they are familiar, and from step- or half-siblings they have regarded as family, 16 with no presumptive right to visitation. A similar result is likely to occur if the adults separate, with particularly harmful consequences if the non-biological parent has been the child's primary caretaker.17 Moreover, if the child's parent and his or her married or cohabiting stepparent separate, sudden economic disaster may befall the child, who has no right to child support from the ex-cohabitant, even if both child and parent have depended upon the cohabitant's income. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信