普京在俄罗斯外交政策中的权力

IF 4.8 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Elias Götz, Michael Mcfaul
{"title":"普京在俄罗斯外交政策中的权力","authors":"Elias Götz, Michael Mcfaul","doi":"10.1162/isec_c_00414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Michael McFaul’s article “Putin, Putinism, and the Domestic Determinants of Russian Foreign Policy” is well timed and likely to play a big role in shaping the debate about contemporary Russian foreign policy.1 The core argument is straightforward: President Vladimir Putin’s illiberal worldviews are a major driver of Russia’s international behavior. To be clear, McFaul acknowledges that other factors inouence Russian behavior as well. In particular, he stresses that the balance of power enables Putin to pursue a confrontational foreign policy, but the balance of power does not motivate or cause his actions (pp. 102–105). Similarly, Russia’s increasingly authoritarian political system serves as a permissive condition, concentrating decisionmaking authority in the hands of Putin (pp. 114–117). Thus, while McFaul recognizes that power and regime-type variables affect Russia’s international behavior, the heavy causal lifting is done by Putin’s illiberal conservatism and anti-Western mindset. The argument is intuitively compelling. On closer inspection, however, it fails to convince for four reasons. First, the article’s research design is oawed. By exploring only cases of Russian interventionism (e.g., Syria and Ukraine), McFaul is selecting on the dependent variable. In effect, he omits cases in which Russia abstained from intervention—although Putin’s anti-liberal mindset would have pushed him to interfere. Consider, for example, Russia’s response to the Velvet Revolution in Armenia. In May 2018, a wave of street protests erupted in Yerevan, demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Serzh Sargasyan, who had been in power for ten years. The opposition made it clear that its ambition was to move the country in a more democratic direction. Thus, according to McFaul’s thesis, Putin should have provided assistance to the Sargasyan regime to crack down on the protesters. This, however, did not happen. Instead, Putin adopted a wait-and-see policy and, after Sargasyan’s resignation, established cordial relations","PeriodicalId":48667,"journal":{"name":"International Security","volume":"113 1","pages":"196-200"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Power of Putin in Russian Foreign Policy\",\"authors\":\"Elias Götz, Michael Mcfaul\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/isec_c_00414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Michael McFaul’s article “Putin, Putinism, and the Domestic Determinants of Russian Foreign Policy” is well timed and likely to play a big role in shaping the debate about contemporary Russian foreign policy.1 The core argument is straightforward: President Vladimir Putin’s illiberal worldviews are a major driver of Russia’s international behavior. To be clear, McFaul acknowledges that other factors inouence Russian behavior as well. In particular, he stresses that the balance of power enables Putin to pursue a confrontational foreign policy, but the balance of power does not motivate or cause his actions (pp. 102–105). Similarly, Russia’s increasingly authoritarian political system serves as a permissive condition, concentrating decisionmaking authority in the hands of Putin (pp. 114–117). Thus, while McFaul recognizes that power and regime-type variables affect Russia’s international behavior, the heavy causal lifting is done by Putin’s illiberal conservatism and anti-Western mindset. The argument is intuitively compelling. On closer inspection, however, it fails to convince for four reasons. First, the article’s research design is oawed. By exploring only cases of Russian interventionism (e.g., Syria and Ukraine), McFaul is selecting on the dependent variable. In effect, he omits cases in which Russia abstained from intervention—although Putin’s anti-liberal mindset would have pushed him to interfere. Consider, for example, Russia’s response to the Velvet Revolution in Armenia. In May 2018, a wave of street protests erupted in Yerevan, demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Serzh Sargasyan, who had been in power for ten years. The opposition made it clear that its ambition was to move the country in a more democratic direction. Thus, according to McFaul’s thesis, Putin should have provided assistance to the Sargasyan regime to crack down on the protesters. This, however, did not happen. Instead, Putin adopted a wait-and-see policy and, after Sargasyan’s resignation, established cordial relations\",\"PeriodicalId\":48667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Security\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"196-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_c_00414\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Security","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_c_00414","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

迈克尔·麦克福尔的文章《普京、普京主义和俄罗斯外交政策的国内决定因素》非常及时,很可能在塑造当代俄罗斯外交政策的辩论中发挥重要作用核心论点很直截了当:俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔•普京(Vladimir Putin)狭隘的世界观是俄罗斯国际行为的主要驱动力。需要明确的是,麦克福尔承认其他因素也影响着俄罗斯的行为。他特别强调,权力平衡使普京能够追求对抗性的外交政策,但权力平衡并没有激励或导致他的行动(第102-105页)。同样,俄罗斯日益专制的政治体制也提供了一个宽松的条件,将决策权集中在普京手中(第114-117页)。因此,虽然麦克福尔认识到权力和政权类型的变量会影响俄罗斯的国际行为,但普京的非自由主义保守主义和反西方心态却起到了很大的作用。这个论点在直觉上是令人信服的。然而,仔细观察,它无法令人信服,原因有四个。首先,对本文的研究设计进行了概述。通过只探讨俄罗斯干预主义的案例(例如,叙利亚和乌克兰),麦克福尔正在选择因变量。实际上,他省略了俄罗斯弃权干预的案例——尽管普京的反自由主义心态会促使他干预。例如,考虑一下俄罗斯对亚美尼亚天鹅绒革命的反应。2018年5月,埃里温爆发街头抗议浪潮,要求执政10年的总理谢尔日·萨尔加斯扬辞职。反对派明确表示,他们的目标是推动国家向更加民主的方向发展。因此,根据麦克福尔的论文,普京应该向马尾藻政权提供援助,以镇压抗议者。然而,这并没有发生。相反,普京采取了观望政策,并在萨尔加斯扬辞职后与俄罗斯建立了友好关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Power of Putin in Russian Foreign Policy
Michael McFaul’s article “Putin, Putinism, and the Domestic Determinants of Russian Foreign Policy” is well timed and likely to play a big role in shaping the debate about contemporary Russian foreign policy.1 The core argument is straightforward: President Vladimir Putin’s illiberal worldviews are a major driver of Russia’s international behavior. To be clear, McFaul acknowledges that other factors inouence Russian behavior as well. In particular, he stresses that the balance of power enables Putin to pursue a confrontational foreign policy, but the balance of power does not motivate or cause his actions (pp. 102–105). Similarly, Russia’s increasingly authoritarian political system serves as a permissive condition, concentrating decisionmaking authority in the hands of Putin (pp. 114–117). Thus, while McFaul recognizes that power and regime-type variables affect Russia’s international behavior, the heavy causal lifting is done by Putin’s illiberal conservatism and anti-Western mindset. The argument is intuitively compelling. On closer inspection, however, it fails to convince for four reasons. First, the article’s research design is oawed. By exploring only cases of Russian interventionism (e.g., Syria and Ukraine), McFaul is selecting on the dependent variable. In effect, he omits cases in which Russia abstained from intervention—although Putin’s anti-liberal mindset would have pushed him to interfere. Consider, for example, Russia’s response to the Velvet Revolution in Armenia. In May 2018, a wave of street protests erupted in Yerevan, demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Serzh Sargasyan, who had been in power for ten years. The opposition made it clear that its ambition was to move the country in a more democratic direction. Thus, according to McFaul’s thesis, Putin should have provided assistance to the Sargasyan regime to crack down on the protesters. This, however, did not happen. Instead, Putin adopted a wait-and-see policy and, after Sargasyan’s resignation, established cordial relations
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Security
International Security Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: International Security publishes lucid, well-documented essays on the full range of contemporary security issues. Its articles address traditional topics of war and peace, as well as more recent dimensions of security, including environmental, demographic, and humanitarian issues, transnational networks, and emerging technologies. International Security has defined the debate on US national security policy and set the agenda for scholarship on international security affairs for more than forty years. The journal values scholarship that challenges the conventional wisdom, examines policy, engages theory, illuminates history, and discovers new trends. Readers of IS discover new developments in: The causes and prevention of war U.S.-China relations Great power politics Ethnic conflict and intra-state war Terrorism and insurgency Regional security in Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America U.S. foreign and defense policy International relations theory Diplomatic and military history Cybersecurity and defense technology Political economy, business, and security Nuclear proliferation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信