非洲常备军:“非洲解决非洲问题”的外部支持?

Olaf Bachmann
{"title":"非洲常备军:“非洲解决非洲问题”的外部支持?","authors":"Olaf Bachmann","doi":"10.1111/j.2040-0217.2011.00067_2.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>External support is essential to the development of the African Standby Force (ASF), an African-led mechanism for crisis management and peace consolidation in Africa. This research paper examines external support to the ASF by several bilateral and multinational contributors, assessing its strengths and limits, and attempts to measure the significance of the support to the aspired outcome.</p>\n <p>The starting point of the study is an analysis of the fast-evolving ASF project, which has gone through many phases of definition and redefinition since it was conceived in the late 1990s. The ASF, it is argued, is a ‘moving target’, due to the inability of African stakeholders to settle on a clear concept, setting themselves ever more ambitious goals at every stage. Partners simultaneously suffer from, and contribute to this state of affairs. Whilst coordination efforts are undertaken, partners' support too often still responds to national (for bilateral donors) or institutional interests (for multilateral ones), each partner using the leeway created by the conceptual ambiguities of the ASF to press its own priorities. Given the overwhelming role of partners in the conceptual maturation of the ASF, and the impact of their funding decisions, this is turn exacerbates the confusion about the true direction of its development. Said differently, the ASF is burdened by the lack of political, conceptual, and financial ownership on the side of the recipients, who are also its main stakeholders. The result is at best an ambiguous partnership, and at worst a waste of human resources, financial means and political capital.</p>\n <p>Attempting to differentiate between degrees of ‘ownership’, the study concludes that it is only if AU member states make a conscious effort to increase their political, conceptual and especially, financial, stake in the ASF that they will credibly demonstrate that it is not an entirely foreign-mastered project, but a real ‘African solution to African problems’.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100617,"journal":{"name":"IDS Research Reports","volume":"2011 67","pages":"1-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0217.2011.00067_2.x","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The African Standby Force: External Support to an ‘African Solution to African Problems’?\",\"authors\":\"Olaf Bachmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.2040-0217.2011.00067_2.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>External support is essential to the development of the African Standby Force (ASF), an African-led mechanism for crisis management and peace consolidation in Africa. This research paper examines external support to the ASF by several bilateral and multinational contributors, assessing its strengths and limits, and attempts to measure the significance of the support to the aspired outcome.</p>\\n <p>The starting point of the study is an analysis of the fast-evolving ASF project, which has gone through many phases of definition and redefinition since it was conceived in the late 1990s. The ASF, it is argued, is a ‘moving target’, due to the inability of African stakeholders to settle on a clear concept, setting themselves ever more ambitious goals at every stage. Partners simultaneously suffer from, and contribute to this state of affairs. Whilst coordination efforts are undertaken, partners' support too often still responds to national (for bilateral donors) or institutional interests (for multilateral ones), each partner using the leeway created by the conceptual ambiguities of the ASF to press its own priorities. Given the overwhelming role of partners in the conceptual maturation of the ASF, and the impact of their funding decisions, this is turn exacerbates the confusion about the true direction of its development. Said differently, the ASF is burdened by the lack of political, conceptual, and financial ownership on the side of the recipients, who are also its main stakeholders. The result is at best an ambiguous partnership, and at worst a waste of human resources, financial means and political capital.</p>\\n <p>Attempting to differentiate between degrees of ‘ownership’, the study concludes that it is only if AU member states make a conscious effort to increase their political, conceptual and especially, financial, stake in the ASF that they will credibly demonstrate that it is not an entirely foreign-mastered project, but a real ‘African solution to African problems’.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IDS Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"2011 67\",\"pages\":\"1-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0217.2011.00067_2.x\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IDS Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0217.2011.00067_2.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDS Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0217.2011.00067_2.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

外部支持对非洲常备部队的发展至关重要,非洲常备部队是非洲领导的危机管理和巩固非洲和平的机制。本研究论文考察了几个双边和多国捐助者对非洲发展论坛的外部支持,评估了其优势和局限性,并试图衡量支持对预期结果的重要性。本研究的出发点是对快速发展的ASF项目的分析,该项目自20世纪90年代末构想以来,经历了许多定义和重新定义的阶段。有人认为,非洲论坛是一个“移动的目标”,因为非洲利益相关者无法确定一个明确的概念,在每个阶段都为自己设定了更加雄心勃勃的目标。伴侣们同时受到这种状况的影响,同时也助长了这种状况。虽然进行了协调努力,但合作伙伴的支持往往仍然是对国家(双边捐助者)或机构利益(多边捐助者)的回应,每个合作伙伴都利用非洲发展论坛概念含糊造成的余地来推动自己的优先事项。鉴于合作伙伴在ASF概念成熟过程中的压倒性作用及其资助决策的影响,这反过来加剧了对其真正发展方向的混淆。换句话说,ASF的负担在于受援国缺乏政治、概念和财务上的所有权,而受援国也是ASF的主要利益相关者。结果往好了说,是一种暧昧的伙伴关系,往坏了说,是人力资源、财政手段和政治资本的浪费。该研究试图区分不同程度的“所有权”,得出的结论是,只有非盟成员国有意识地努力增加他们在非洲论坛的政治、概念,尤其是财政上的股份,他们才能令人信服地证明,这不是一个完全由外国主导的项目,而是一个真正的“非洲解决非洲问题的方案”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The African Standby Force: External Support to an ‘African Solution to African Problems’?

External support is essential to the development of the African Standby Force (ASF), an African-led mechanism for crisis management and peace consolidation in Africa. This research paper examines external support to the ASF by several bilateral and multinational contributors, assessing its strengths and limits, and attempts to measure the significance of the support to the aspired outcome.

The starting point of the study is an analysis of the fast-evolving ASF project, which has gone through many phases of definition and redefinition since it was conceived in the late 1990s. The ASF, it is argued, is a ‘moving target’, due to the inability of African stakeholders to settle on a clear concept, setting themselves ever more ambitious goals at every stage. Partners simultaneously suffer from, and contribute to this state of affairs. Whilst coordination efforts are undertaken, partners' support too often still responds to national (for bilateral donors) or institutional interests (for multilateral ones), each partner using the leeway created by the conceptual ambiguities of the ASF to press its own priorities. Given the overwhelming role of partners in the conceptual maturation of the ASF, and the impact of their funding decisions, this is turn exacerbates the confusion about the true direction of its development. Said differently, the ASF is burdened by the lack of political, conceptual, and financial ownership on the side of the recipients, who are also its main stakeholders. The result is at best an ambiguous partnership, and at worst a waste of human resources, financial means and political capital.

Attempting to differentiate between degrees of ‘ownership’, the study concludes that it is only if AU member states make a conscious effort to increase their political, conceptual and especially, financial, stake in the ASF that they will credibly demonstrate that it is not an entirely foreign-mastered project, but a real ‘African solution to African problems’.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信