平衡机制与有机设计要素:突发事件指挥系统(ICS)的设计与实现

R. Chang, J. Trainor
{"title":"平衡机制与有机设计要素:突发事件指挥系统(ICS)的设计与实现","authors":"R. Chang, J. Trainor","doi":"10.1177/028072702003800301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Incident Command System (ICS), since its establishment in the 1980s, has been repeatedly discussed with the focuses on its pros and cons. These discussions are related to the benefits and limitations of using a mechanistic system. ICS proponents like its mechanistic design elements to command and control all responders. ICS critics, however, regard ICS mechanistic elements as hurdles to managing disaster response activities, and thus, they propose using more organic elements to design a new response system. Organizational theorists say the two types of systems are not dichotomous. It is possible the ICS has some organic design elements, and thus, cannot be treated as a pure command and control system. This research aims to explore to what degree the ICS is organic versus mechanistic. The researchers will present their analyses of two official ICS documents and three ICS online training courses, which indicates the ICS possesses both organic and mechanistic features. Results of the content analysis also demonstrate some limitations of using the ICS and show why there are so many different viewpoints toward this system.","PeriodicalId":84928,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters","volume":"31 1","pages":"241 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Mechanistic and Organic Design Elements: The Design and Implementation of the Incident Command System (ICS)\",\"authors\":\"R. Chang, J. Trainor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/028072702003800301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Incident Command System (ICS), since its establishment in the 1980s, has been repeatedly discussed with the focuses on its pros and cons. These discussions are related to the benefits and limitations of using a mechanistic system. ICS proponents like its mechanistic design elements to command and control all responders. ICS critics, however, regard ICS mechanistic elements as hurdles to managing disaster response activities, and thus, they propose using more organic elements to design a new response system. Organizational theorists say the two types of systems are not dichotomous. It is possible the ICS has some organic design elements, and thus, cannot be treated as a pure command and control system. This research aims to explore to what degree the ICS is organic versus mechanistic. The researchers will present their analyses of two official ICS documents and three ICS online training courses, which indicates the ICS possesses both organic and mechanistic features. Results of the content analysis also demonstrate some limitations of using the ICS and show why there are so many different viewpoints toward this system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/028072702003800301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/028072702003800301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事故指挥系统(ICS)自20世纪80年代建立以来,一直被反复讨论,重点是其利弊。这些讨论与使用机械系统的好处和局限性有关。ICS的支持者喜欢它的机械设计元素来指挥和控制所有响应者。然而,ICS的批评者认为ICS的机械因素是管理灾害响应活动的障碍,因此,他们建议使用更多的有机因素来设计一个新的响应系统。组织理论家说,这两种类型的系统并不是二分的。ICS可能有一些有机设计元素,因此,不能作为一个纯粹的指挥和控制系统来对待。本研究旨在探讨ICS在多大程度上是有机的还是机械性的。研究人员将对两份官方ICS文件和三份ICS在线培训课程进行分析,表明ICS具有有机和机械的特征。内容分析的结果还显示了使用ICS的一些局限性,并说明了为什么对该系统有如此多的不同观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing Mechanistic and Organic Design Elements: The Design and Implementation of the Incident Command System (ICS)
The Incident Command System (ICS), since its establishment in the 1980s, has been repeatedly discussed with the focuses on its pros and cons. These discussions are related to the benefits and limitations of using a mechanistic system. ICS proponents like its mechanistic design elements to command and control all responders. ICS critics, however, regard ICS mechanistic elements as hurdles to managing disaster response activities, and thus, they propose using more organic elements to design a new response system. Organizational theorists say the two types of systems are not dichotomous. It is possible the ICS has some organic design elements, and thus, cannot be treated as a pure command and control system. This research aims to explore to what degree the ICS is organic versus mechanistic. The researchers will present their analyses of two official ICS documents and three ICS online training courses, which indicates the ICS possesses both organic and mechanistic features. Results of the content analysis also demonstrate some limitations of using the ICS and show why there are so many different viewpoints toward this system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信