东欧电视台

IF 0.2 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
A. Imre
{"title":"东欧电视台","authors":"A. Imre","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of television studies has given us a rich tapestry of the history and theory of the dominant commercial model that developed in the United States, and of the public broadcasting model that defined Western European television systems, through the 1980s. However, substantial work on the histories of Eastern European and (post)Soviet broadcasting has only appeared in English in the new millennium. To some extent, this absence of work on (post)socialist television has been due to a shortage of information about socialist cultures. Other reasons include television studies’ own identification of American TV as the normative path of the medium’s development, supported by a Cold War ideological filter toward (post)socialist cultures, which equated socialist TV with propaganda, as well as television’s status in Eastern Europe as a “lowly” popular medium not worthy of serious study. Recent publications have finally challenged the lingering stereotypes about socialist systems and introduced a different model of television into the study of the media. They have shown that, while socialist television systems varied significantly in terms of language, cultural tradition, political attitudes, and economic development, Eastern European and Soviet TV welcomed a range of innovative aesthetic practices and involved hybrid economic models. It fostered frequent exchanges and collaborations within the region and with Western media institutions, a programming flow across borders, a steady production of genre entertainment, in some cases significant reliance on commercial revenue, and transcultural reception practices along the shared broadcast signals of national borders. Rather than homogeneity and brainwashing, the history of Eastern European television shows affinity and collaboration with Western European public broadcasters; socialist party leaderships’ more or less haphazard attempts at control, which was constantly tempered by the demands of viewers to be entertained; the crucial role of competition as a driving force;, and experiments with various forms and genres in an effort to convey authenticity and persuasion. With transnational conglomerates’ rapid takeover of postsocialist media markets in the 1990s, and the accession of most former socialist states into the European Union in the mid-2000s, the story of Eastern European television has officially become a part of that of European TV and, more broadly, of the globalization of the media industries. What still justifies a regional approach are simultaneous political-economic developments that have once again shaped the region’s media in similar ways: after a short period of hard-fought reforms over media ownership and regulation in the 1990s, Europe’s financial crises in the late 2000s gravely affected postsocialist media economies and prepared television for a new type of re-centralization under the control of illiberal national oligarchies in coexistence with global neoliberal competition and consumer access to media content from around the world.","PeriodicalId":41388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eastern European Television\",\"authors\":\"A. Imre\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field of television studies has given us a rich tapestry of the history and theory of the dominant commercial model that developed in the United States, and of the public broadcasting model that defined Western European television systems, through the 1980s. However, substantial work on the histories of Eastern European and (post)Soviet broadcasting has only appeared in English in the new millennium. To some extent, this absence of work on (post)socialist television has been due to a shortage of information about socialist cultures. Other reasons include television studies’ own identification of American TV as the normative path of the medium’s development, supported by a Cold War ideological filter toward (post)socialist cultures, which equated socialist TV with propaganda, as well as television’s status in Eastern Europe as a “lowly” popular medium not worthy of serious study. Recent publications have finally challenged the lingering stereotypes about socialist systems and introduced a different model of television into the study of the media. They have shown that, while socialist television systems varied significantly in terms of language, cultural tradition, political attitudes, and economic development, Eastern European and Soviet TV welcomed a range of innovative aesthetic practices and involved hybrid economic models. It fostered frequent exchanges and collaborations within the region and with Western media institutions, a programming flow across borders, a steady production of genre entertainment, in some cases significant reliance on commercial revenue, and transcultural reception practices along the shared broadcast signals of national borders. Rather than homogeneity and brainwashing, the history of Eastern European television shows affinity and collaboration with Western European public broadcasters; socialist party leaderships’ more or less haphazard attempts at control, which was constantly tempered by the demands of viewers to be entertained; the crucial role of competition as a driving force;, and experiments with various forms and genres in an effort to convey authenticity and persuasion. With transnational conglomerates’ rapid takeover of postsocialist media markets in the 1990s, and the accession of most former socialist states into the European Union in the mid-2000s, the story of Eastern European television has officially become a part of that of European TV and, more broadly, of the globalization of the media industries. What still justifies a regional approach are simultaneous political-economic developments that have once again shaped the region’s media in similar ways: after a short period of hard-fought reforms over media ownership and regulation in the 1990s, Europe’s financial crises in the late 2000s gravely affected postsocialist media economies and prepared television for a new type of re-centralization under the control of illiberal national oligarchies in coexistence with global neoliberal competition and consumer access to media content from around the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电视研究领域为我们提供了丰富的历史和理论,包括在美国发展的主导商业模式,以及在20世纪80年代定义西欧电视系统的公共广播模式。然而,关于东欧和(后)苏联广播历史的大量著作直到新千年才以英文出现。在某种程度上,社会主义电视工作的缺失是由于缺乏关于社会主义文化的信息。其他原因包括电视研究本身将美国电视视为媒介发展的规范路径,并受到冷战时期对(后)社会主义文化的意识形态过滤的支持,这种过滤将社会主义电视等同于宣传,以及电视在东欧作为一种“低级”大众媒介的地位,不值得认真研究。最近的出版物终于挑战了对社会主义制度挥之不去的刻板印象,并在媒体研究中引入了一种不同的电视模式。他们已经表明,虽然社会主义电视系统在语言、文化传统、政治态度和经济发展方面存在显著差异,但东欧和苏联电视欢迎一系列创新的审美实践,并涉及混合经济模式。它促进了该地区内部和与西方媒体机构的频繁交流与合作,跨国界的节目流动,类型娱乐的稳定生产,在某些情况下对商业收入的重大依赖,以及跨文化接收实践沿着国家边界的共享广播信号。东欧电视的历史并非同质化和洗脑,而是显示出与西欧公共广播公司的密切关系和合作;社会党领导人或多或少随意地试图控制,但观众对娱乐的要求不断削弱了这种控制;竞争作为一种驱动力的关键作用,并尝试各种形式和流派,以努力传达真实性和说服力。随着跨国企业集团在20世纪90年代迅速接管后社会主义媒体市场,以及大多数前社会主义国家在21世纪头十年中期加入欧盟,东欧电视的故事已经正式成为欧洲电视故事的一部分,更广泛地说,是媒体产业全球化的一部分。同时出现的政治经济发展再次以类似的方式塑造了该地区的媒体,这仍然证明了区域性方法的合理性:在20世纪90年代对媒体所有权和监管进行了短暂的艰苦改革之后,2000年代后期的欧洲金融危机严重影响了后社会主义媒体经济,并为电视在非自由主义的国家寡头控制下的新型再集中做好了准备,与全球新自由主义竞争和消费者从世界各地获取媒体内容共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eastern European Television
The field of television studies has given us a rich tapestry of the history and theory of the dominant commercial model that developed in the United States, and of the public broadcasting model that defined Western European television systems, through the 1980s. However, substantial work on the histories of Eastern European and (post)Soviet broadcasting has only appeared in English in the new millennium. To some extent, this absence of work on (post)socialist television has been due to a shortage of information about socialist cultures. Other reasons include television studies’ own identification of American TV as the normative path of the medium’s development, supported by a Cold War ideological filter toward (post)socialist cultures, which equated socialist TV with propaganda, as well as television’s status in Eastern Europe as a “lowly” popular medium not worthy of serious study. Recent publications have finally challenged the lingering stereotypes about socialist systems and introduced a different model of television into the study of the media. They have shown that, while socialist television systems varied significantly in terms of language, cultural tradition, political attitudes, and economic development, Eastern European and Soviet TV welcomed a range of innovative aesthetic practices and involved hybrid economic models. It fostered frequent exchanges and collaborations within the region and with Western media institutions, a programming flow across borders, a steady production of genre entertainment, in some cases significant reliance on commercial revenue, and transcultural reception practices along the shared broadcast signals of national borders. Rather than homogeneity and brainwashing, the history of Eastern European television shows affinity and collaboration with Western European public broadcasters; socialist party leaderships’ more or less haphazard attempts at control, which was constantly tempered by the demands of viewers to be entertained; the crucial role of competition as a driving force;, and experiments with various forms and genres in an effort to convey authenticity and persuasion. With transnational conglomerates’ rapid takeover of postsocialist media markets in the 1990s, and the accession of most former socialist states into the European Union in the mid-2000s, the story of Eastern European television has officially become a part of that of European TV and, more broadly, of the globalization of the media industries. What still justifies a regional approach are simultaneous political-economic developments that have once again shaped the region’s media in similar ways: after a short period of hard-fought reforms over media ownership and regulation in the 1990s, Europe’s financial crises in the late 2000s gravely affected postsocialist media economies and prepared television for a new type of re-centralization under the control of illiberal national oligarchies in coexistence with global neoliberal competition and consumer access to media content from around the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies is an English-language forum for theoretical, methodological and critical debate on Italian film and media production, reception and consumption. It provides a platform for dialogue between academics, filmmakers, cinema and media professionals. This peer-reviewed journal invites submissions of scholarly articles relating to the artistic features, cultural themes, international influence and history of Italian film and media. Furthermore, the journal intends to revive a critical discussion on the auteurs, revisit the historiography of Italian cinema and celebrate the dynamic role played by new directors. The journal includes a book and film review section as well as notes on Italian film festivals abroad and international conference reports. The profound transformation undergone by the rapidly expanding media environment under the impact of digital technology, has lead scholars in the field of media studies to elaborate new theoretical paradigms and methodological approaches to account for the complexities of a changing landscape of convergence and hybridization. The boundaries between cinema and media as art forms and fields of inquiry are increasingly hybridized too. Taking into account this evolving scenario, the JICMS provides an international arena for critical engagement with a wider range of issues related to the current media environment. The journal welcomes in particular contributions that discuss any aspects of Italian media production, distribution and consumption within national and transnational, social, political, economic and historical contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信