B. Bulucu, C. Yeşilyurt, Davut Çelik, G. Eyuboglu, C. Alp, H. Aydemir
{"title":"三种胶粘剂体系与不同牙本质组织的微拉伸结合强度","authors":"B. Bulucu, C. Yeşilyurt, Davut Çelik, G. Eyuboglu, C. Alp, H. Aydemir","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.118900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the micro-tensile bond strengths (mTBS) of three adhesive systems (Prime&Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond, G Bond) to four different dentin structures; bovine dentin and unerupted, sound, caries affected human dentins. Materials and Methods: Flat bovine molar, unerupted, sound and caries affected human molar dentin structures were obtained at the occlusal surfaces of the extracted teeth. Final surface grindings were performed using 600-grit Silicon carbide paper. Three adhesive systems (Prime&Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond, G Bond) were used to bond composite resin (P60, 3M ESPE) to the prepared dentin surfaces. After 24 h distilled-water storage, the bonded specimens were cross-sectioned (0.8 ± 0.2 mm 2 ) and subjected to a (μTBS) test. One-way analysis of variance multiple comparison test were used to statistically analyze the mean bond strength data α =0.05. Results: There was statistically significant difference in mTBS among the dentin types (P < 0.0005). Mean bond strength to sound human and bovine dentin was significantly higher than to caries-affected dentin and dentin of unerupted human teeth (P < 0.05). Statistically similar bond strength was obtained with Prime&Bond NT and Clearfil SE Bond while G-Bond showed the lowest bond strengths. Conclusion: The type of dentin structure has an important effect on the mTBS values of adhesive systems.","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"40 1","pages":"81 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems to different dentin tissues\",\"authors\":\"B. Bulucu, C. Yeşilyurt, Davut Çelik, G. Eyuboglu, C. Alp, H. Aydemir\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2321-4619.118900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the micro-tensile bond strengths (mTBS) of three adhesive systems (Prime&Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond, G Bond) to four different dentin structures; bovine dentin and unerupted, sound, caries affected human dentins. Materials and Methods: Flat bovine molar, unerupted, sound and caries affected human molar dentin structures were obtained at the occlusal surfaces of the extracted teeth. Final surface grindings were performed using 600-grit Silicon carbide paper. Three adhesive systems (Prime&Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond, G Bond) were used to bond composite resin (P60, 3M ESPE) to the prepared dentin surfaces. After 24 h distilled-water storage, the bonded specimens were cross-sectioned (0.8 ± 0.2 mm 2 ) and subjected to a (μTBS) test. One-way analysis of variance multiple comparison test were used to statistically analyze the mean bond strength data α =0.05. Results: There was statistically significant difference in mTBS among the dentin types (P < 0.0005). Mean bond strength to sound human and bovine dentin was significantly higher than to caries-affected dentin and dentin of unerupted human teeth (P < 0.05). Statistically similar bond strength was obtained with Prime&Bond NT and Clearfil SE Bond while G-Bond showed the lowest bond strengths. Conclusion: The type of dentin structure has an important effect on the mTBS values of adhesive systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.118900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.118900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:研究Prime&Bond NT、Clearfil SE bond、G bond三种胶粘剂体系与四种不同牙本质结构的微拉伸结合强度(mTBS);牛牙本质和未爆发的,健全的,龋齿影响人类牙本质。材料与方法:在拔牙的咬合面获得扁平的牛磨牙、未出牙、健全的和受龋影响的人磨牙本质结构。最后用600粒碳化硅纸进行表面磨削。使用三种粘合剂系统(Prime&Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond, G Bond)将复合树脂(P60, 3M ESPE)粘合到制备的牙本质表面。蒸馏水保存24 h后,对粘接试样进行(0.8±0.2 mm 2)横切,并进行(μTBS)测试。采用单因素方差分析、多重比较检验对平均粘结强度数据进行统计学分析α =0.05。结果:不同牙本质类型间mTBS差异有统计学意义(P < 0.0005)。与正常人和牛牙本质的平均结合强度显著高于患龋牙本质和未出牙牙本质(P < 0.05)。Prime&Bond NT和Clearfil SE bond的结合强度在统计学上相似,而G-Bond的结合强度最低。结论:牙本质结构类型对粘接系统的mTBS值有重要影响。
Microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems to different dentin tissues
Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the micro-tensile bond strengths (mTBS) of three adhesive systems (Prime&Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond, G Bond) to four different dentin structures; bovine dentin and unerupted, sound, caries affected human dentins. Materials and Methods: Flat bovine molar, unerupted, sound and caries affected human molar dentin structures were obtained at the occlusal surfaces of the extracted teeth. Final surface grindings were performed using 600-grit Silicon carbide paper. Three adhesive systems (Prime&Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond, G Bond) were used to bond composite resin (P60, 3M ESPE) to the prepared dentin surfaces. After 24 h distilled-water storage, the bonded specimens were cross-sectioned (0.8 ± 0.2 mm 2 ) and subjected to a (μTBS) test. One-way analysis of variance multiple comparison test were used to statistically analyze the mean bond strength data α =0.05. Results: There was statistically significant difference in mTBS among the dentin types (P < 0.0005). Mean bond strength to sound human and bovine dentin was significantly higher than to caries-affected dentin and dentin of unerupted human teeth (P < 0.05). Statistically similar bond strength was obtained with Prime&Bond NT and Clearfil SE Bond while G-Bond showed the lowest bond strengths. Conclusion: The type of dentin structure has an important effect on the mTBS values of adhesive systems.