F. Jahangiri, Andrea Flolmberg, F. Vega–Bermudez, V. Arlet
{"title":"颈椎前路手术中术中体感诱发电位和经颅运动诱发电位预防体位相关性臂丛神经损伤","authors":"F. Jahangiri, Andrea Flolmberg, F. Vega–Bermudez, V. Arlet","doi":"10.1080/1086508X.2011.11079820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT. The use of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to monitor upper extremity nerves during surgery is becoming more accepted as a valid and useful technique to minimize intraoperative nerve injuries. We present a case illustrating the benefit of utilizing both SSEPs and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs) for preventing position-related injury during surgery. The patient was a 43-year-old male with a history of neck pain, along with numbness and tingling of the upper extremities. While the patient was being draped, upper extremity SSEPs diminished significantly. TCeMEP responses in the hands (abductor pollicus brevis-abductor digiti minimi; APB-ADM) vanished shortly after that, followed by the biceps and left deltoid. The surgeons were notified, and the tape on the shoulders was loosened. No improvements were noted in SSEPs nor TCeMEPs due to this intervention, so all tape was removed and the patient's arms were allowed to rest naturally upon the arm boards. Upper extremity TCeMEP responses could then be elicited and SSEPs improved shortly afterward. Surgery was completed with the arms on the arm boards. All signals remained stable for the remaining three hours of the procedure. At two months follow-up, the patient was well with total pain relief and normal upper extremity function when neurological examination was performed. This report demonstrates a case in which intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring was useful in identifying and reversing impending nerve injury during cervical spine surgery. Significant changes were seen in SSEPs as well as TCeMEPs, so we recommend that TCeMEP monitoring be considered as an adjunct to SSEPs for prevention of injury to the brachial plexus.","PeriodicalId":7480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology","volume":"33 1","pages":"198 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventing Position-Related Brachial Plexus Injury with Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials during Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery\",\"authors\":\"F. Jahangiri, Andrea Flolmberg, F. Vega–Bermudez, V. Arlet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1086508X.2011.11079820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT. The use of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to monitor upper extremity nerves during surgery is becoming more accepted as a valid and useful technique to minimize intraoperative nerve injuries. We present a case illustrating the benefit of utilizing both SSEPs and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs) for preventing position-related injury during surgery. The patient was a 43-year-old male with a history of neck pain, along with numbness and tingling of the upper extremities. While the patient was being draped, upper extremity SSEPs diminished significantly. TCeMEP responses in the hands (abductor pollicus brevis-abductor digiti minimi; APB-ADM) vanished shortly after that, followed by the biceps and left deltoid. The surgeons were notified, and the tape on the shoulders was loosened. No improvements were noted in SSEPs nor TCeMEPs due to this intervention, so all tape was removed and the patient's arms were allowed to rest naturally upon the arm boards. Upper extremity TCeMEP responses could then be elicited and SSEPs improved shortly afterward. Surgery was completed with the arms on the arm boards. All signals remained stable for the remaining three hours of the procedure. At two months follow-up, the patient was well with total pain relief and normal upper extremity function when neurological examination was performed. This report demonstrates a case in which intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring was useful in identifying and reversing impending nerve injury during cervical spine surgery. Significant changes were seen in SSEPs as well as TCeMEPs, so we recommend that TCeMEP monitoring be considered as an adjunct to SSEPs for prevention of injury to the brachial plexus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"198 - 205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1086508X.2011.11079820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1086508X.2011.11079820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preventing Position-Related Brachial Plexus Injury with Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials during Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
ABSTRACT. The use of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to monitor upper extremity nerves during surgery is becoming more accepted as a valid and useful technique to minimize intraoperative nerve injuries. We present a case illustrating the benefit of utilizing both SSEPs and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs) for preventing position-related injury during surgery. The patient was a 43-year-old male with a history of neck pain, along with numbness and tingling of the upper extremities. While the patient was being draped, upper extremity SSEPs diminished significantly. TCeMEP responses in the hands (abductor pollicus brevis-abductor digiti minimi; APB-ADM) vanished shortly after that, followed by the biceps and left deltoid. The surgeons were notified, and the tape on the shoulders was loosened. No improvements were noted in SSEPs nor TCeMEPs due to this intervention, so all tape was removed and the patient's arms were allowed to rest naturally upon the arm boards. Upper extremity TCeMEP responses could then be elicited and SSEPs improved shortly afterward. Surgery was completed with the arms on the arm boards. All signals remained stable for the remaining three hours of the procedure. At two months follow-up, the patient was well with total pain relief and normal upper extremity function when neurological examination was performed. This report demonstrates a case in which intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring was useful in identifying and reversing impending nerve injury during cervical spine surgery. Significant changes were seen in SSEPs as well as TCeMEPs, so we recommend that TCeMEP monitoring be considered as an adjunct to SSEPs for prevention of injury to the brachial plexus.