维石采石场块体最佳回收的台阶爆破设计——以苏伯-尼日利亚碎石工业为例

M. Saliu, Shaib Abdulazeez Shehu
{"title":"维石采石场块体最佳回收的台阶爆破设计——以苏伯-尼日利亚碎石工业为例","authors":"M. Saliu, Shaib Abdulazeez Shehu","doi":"10.4314/gjer.v12i1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dimension stone quarry is believed to be type of mining operation that always result to low recovery since what is expected from the extracting operation is a cubical block with no fracture. It is noticed that majority of the damage in the natural blocks are always from poor extraction method. In aggregate quarry, series of work have been done on powder factor that gives economical blasting. In this research work, breaking factor is used in place of powder factor since breaking is required not powder. The aim of this research work is to establish a standard breaking factor for bench blasting in dimension quarries that will improve recovery. Two cases were considered. In case 1, gun powder is used for basal cutting. Of the seven patterns considered, pattern3 gives highest recovery (70%) with breaking factor of 23.15g/m 3 (i.e. 5kg of Gun powder for (6 by 6 by 6) m bench design). In the case 2, dynacord is used for basal cutting. Of the four patterns considered, pattern 2 gives highest recovery (55%) with breaking factor of 15g/m 3 ( i.e. 3.24kg of explosive for (6 by 6 by 6) m bench design. Keywords: Extracting, powder factor, aggregate, recovery, breaking factor","PeriodicalId":12520,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Research In Engineering","volume":"112 1","pages":"85-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bench Blasting Design for Optimum Recovery of Blocks in Dimension Stone Quarries: A Case Study of Crushed Rock Industry, Supare-Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"M. Saliu, Shaib Abdulazeez Shehu\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/gjer.v12i1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dimension stone quarry is believed to be type of mining operation that always result to low recovery since what is expected from the extracting operation is a cubical block with no fracture. It is noticed that majority of the damage in the natural blocks are always from poor extraction method. In aggregate quarry, series of work have been done on powder factor that gives economical blasting. In this research work, breaking factor is used in place of powder factor since breaking is required not powder. The aim of this research work is to establish a standard breaking factor for bench blasting in dimension quarries that will improve recovery. Two cases were considered. In case 1, gun powder is used for basal cutting. Of the seven patterns considered, pattern3 gives highest recovery (70%) with breaking factor of 23.15g/m 3 (i.e. 5kg of Gun powder for (6 by 6 by 6) m bench design). In the case 2, dynacord is used for basal cutting. Of the four patterns considered, pattern 2 gives highest recovery (55%) with breaking factor of 15g/m 3 ( i.e. 3.24kg of explosive for (6 by 6 by 6) m bench design. Keywords: Extracting, powder factor, aggregate, recovery, breaking factor\",\"PeriodicalId\":12520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Research In Engineering\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"85-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Research In Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjer.v12i1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Research In Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjer.v12i1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尺寸石采石场被认为是一种采矿作业,它总是导致低回收率,因为从提取作业中所期望的是一个没有断裂的立方体块。人们注意到,天然块体的大部分破坏都是由于开采方法不当造成的。在骨料采石场进行了一系列的粉料因素研究,使爆破经济有效。在本研究中,由于需要破碎而非粉末,故采用破碎因子代替粉末因子。本研究工作的目的是建立一个标准的台阶爆破破碎系数,以提高采收率。考虑了两种情况。在情形1中,使用火药进行基切。在考虑的七种模式中,模式n3的回收率最高(70%),破碎系数为23.15g/ m3(即(6 × 6 × 6) m长凳设计的5kg火药)。在情况2中,dyacord用于基切。在考虑的四种模式中,模式2的回收率最高(55%),破碎系数为15g/ m3(即(6 × 6 × 6) m平台设计的炸药为3.24kg。关键词:萃取,粉末因子,骨料,回收率,破碎因子
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bench Blasting Design for Optimum Recovery of Blocks in Dimension Stone Quarries: A Case Study of Crushed Rock Industry, Supare-Nigeria
Dimension stone quarry is believed to be type of mining operation that always result to low recovery since what is expected from the extracting operation is a cubical block with no fracture. It is noticed that majority of the damage in the natural blocks are always from poor extraction method. In aggregate quarry, series of work have been done on powder factor that gives economical blasting. In this research work, breaking factor is used in place of powder factor since breaking is required not powder. The aim of this research work is to establish a standard breaking factor for bench blasting in dimension quarries that will improve recovery. Two cases were considered. In case 1, gun powder is used for basal cutting. Of the seven patterns considered, pattern3 gives highest recovery (70%) with breaking factor of 23.15g/m 3 (i.e. 5kg of Gun powder for (6 by 6 by 6) m bench design). In the case 2, dynacord is used for basal cutting. Of the four patterns considered, pattern 2 gives highest recovery (55%) with breaking factor of 15g/m 3 ( i.e. 3.24kg of explosive for (6 by 6 by 6) m bench design. Keywords: Extracting, powder factor, aggregate, recovery, breaking factor
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信