教师在设计专业发展胜任力模型中的作用

Igor Đuric, Vladimir Stanojević
{"title":"教师在设计专业发展胜任力模型中的作用","authors":"Igor Đuric, Vladimir Stanojević","doi":"10.5937/zrffp52-32925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional development of teachers can be viewed as a heterotopia of simultaneous presence of different schools of opinion on teachers' professional competence. The underlying premise of this research is that professional development can simultaneously rely on various theoretical approaches, with boundaries between individual forms of teacher education being fluid, without the existence of a single view of the teaching profession that is regarded as fixed, unique, and correct. Alternative research paradigms and diverse schools of thought have not resulted in a single theory of teachers' professional development that would be applicable in all educational systems. One of the solutions is for teachers to get involved, create, and adapt professional development programs to their needs, and to the needs of the institution, community, and the context of authentic school discourse. Teacher competence and professional identity explicitly require the involvement of teachers in the exchange of ideas (practitioner's voice), taking into account the context in which they work and their experience, promoting reflexivity and research approach, balancing individual and community interests, and the like. One of the solutions pointed out in this paper is to emphasize the importance of the philosophy of professional development and the role of teachers in relation to this metalevel of the pedeutological field of pedagogy. The metalevel of the pedeutological field of pedagogy, shaped in the form of a defining philosophical opinion on teachers' professional development, in which teachers become one of the factors in creating and implementing alternative schools of opinion on teacher education, can have two effects: (1) directly affect professional development of teacher competencies; and also (2) indirectly influence the improvement of educational practice. This separate type of teacher competence can be an important factor in teachers' professional development, but also a significant component of the quality of the educational process that is realized in schools. The metalevel of professional development of teachers, if regarded as a known and recognized concept to be used in professional education of teachers (both pre-service and in-service), could also have certain effects on teacher personal development lying at the basis of professional development: satisfying the need for belonging and recognition-awareness of teachers that they are an important part of their community and that their activities have a purpose and meaningdeveloping internal motivation and a positive attitude towards the profession, developing self-confidence and a feeling of being professionally autonomous and able to predict the consequences of their own decisions and to critically evaluate and self-evaluate their own work, and also to constructively participate in the processes of joint evaluation with other stakeholders of teachers' professional development. This approach to professional competencies and teachers' professional development needs to be empirically verified so that its possible contributions in authentic (diverse) educational contexts can be determined.","PeriodicalId":55773,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini","volume":"18 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher's role in designing the competency model of professional development\",\"authors\":\"Igor Đuric, Vladimir Stanojević\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/zrffp52-32925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professional development of teachers can be viewed as a heterotopia of simultaneous presence of different schools of opinion on teachers' professional competence. The underlying premise of this research is that professional development can simultaneously rely on various theoretical approaches, with boundaries between individual forms of teacher education being fluid, without the existence of a single view of the teaching profession that is regarded as fixed, unique, and correct. Alternative research paradigms and diverse schools of thought have not resulted in a single theory of teachers' professional development that would be applicable in all educational systems. One of the solutions is for teachers to get involved, create, and adapt professional development programs to their needs, and to the needs of the institution, community, and the context of authentic school discourse. Teacher competence and professional identity explicitly require the involvement of teachers in the exchange of ideas (practitioner's voice), taking into account the context in which they work and their experience, promoting reflexivity and research approach, balancing individual and community interests, and the like. One of the solutions pointed out in this paper is to emphasize the importance of the philosophy of professional development and the role of teachers in relation to this metalevel of the pedeutological field of pedagogy. The metalevel of the pedeutological field of pedagogy, shaped in the form of a defining philosophical opinion on teachers' professional development, in which teachers become one of the factors in creating and implementing alternative schools of opinion on teacher education, can have two effects: (1) directly affect professional development of teacher competencies; and also (2) indirectly influence the improvement of educational practice. This separate type of teacher competence can be an important factor in teachers' professional development, but also a significant component of the quality of the educational process that is realized in schools. The metalevel of professional development of teachers, if regarded as a known and recognized concept to be used in professional education of teachers (both pre-service and in-service), could also have certain effects on teacher personal development lying at the basis of professional development: satisfying the need for belonging and recognition-awareness of teachers that they are an important part of their community and that their activities have a purpose and meaningdeveloping internal motivation and a positive attitude towards the profession, developing self-confidence and a feeling of being professionally autonomous and able to predict the consequences of their own decisions and to critically evaluate and self-evaluate their own work, and also to constructively participate in the processes of joint evaluation with other stakeholders of teachers' professional development. This approach to professional competencies and teachers' professional development needs to be empirically verified so that its possible contributions in authentic (diverse) educational contexts can be determined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini\",\"volume\":\"18 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp52-32925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp52-32925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师的专业发展可以看作是对教师专业能力的不同观点同时存在的一种异托邦。本研究的基本前提是,专业发展可以同时依赖于各种理论方法,教师教育的个体形式之间的界限是流动的,不存在一种被认为是固定的、独特的和正确的教师职业观。不同的研究范式和不同的思想流派并没有产生一种适用于所有教育系统的教师专业发展理论。其中一个解决方案是教师参与,创造和调整专业发展计划,以满足他们的需求,以及机构,社区和真实学校话语背景的需求。教师能力和专业认同明确要求教师参与思想交流(实践者的声音),考虑到他们工作的背景和他们的经验,促进反思和研究方法,平衡个人和社区利益,等等。本文指出的解决方案之一是强调专业发展理念的重要性,以及教师在教育学理论领域这一金属层面上的作用。教育学定义领域的元层面,以界定教师专业发展的哲学观点的形式形成,其中教师成为创造和实施教师教育另类学派观点的因素之一,可以产生两种影响:(1)直接影响教师能力的专业发展;(2)间接影响教育实践的提高。这种独立类型的教师能力可以是教师专业发展的重要因素,也是学校实现的教育过程质量的重要组成部分。教师专业发展的金属层面,如果作为一个已知和公认的概念,用于教师的专业教育(包括职前和在职),也会对教师的个人发展产生一定的影响,这是专业发展的基础:满足归属感和认可的需要——教师意识到他们是社区的重要组成部分,他们的活动有目的和意义——培养内在动机和对职业的积极态度,培养自信和专业自主的感觉,能够预测自己决定的后果,能够批判性地评价和自我评价自己的工作;并建设性地参与与教师专业发展的其他利益相关者的联合评估过程。这种专业能力和教师专业发展的方法需要经过经验验证,以便确定其在真实(多样化)教育背景下可能做出的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teacher's role in designing the competency model of professional development
Professional development of teachers can be viewed as a heterotopia of simultaneous presence of different schools of opinion on teachers' professional competence. The underlying premise of this research is that professional development can simultaneously rely on various theoretical approaches, with boundaries between individual forms of teacher education being fluid, without the existence of a single view of the teaching profession that is regarded as fixed, unique, and correct. Alternative research paradigms and diverse schools of thought have not resulted in a single theory of teachers' professional development that would be applicable in all educational systems. One of the solutions is for teachers to get involved, create, and adapt professional development programs to their needs, and to the needs of the institution, community, and the context of authentic school discourse. Teacher competence and professional identity explicitly require the involvement of teachers in the exchange of ideas (practitioner's voice), taking into account the context in which they work and their experience, promoting reflexivity and research approach, balancing individual and community interests, and the like. One of the solutions pointed out in this paper is to emphasize the importance of the philosophy of professional development and the role of teachers in relation to this metalevel of the pedeutological field of pedagogy. The metalevel of the pedeutological field of pedagogy, shaped in the form of a defining philosophical opinion on teachers' professional development, in which teachers become one of the factors in creating and implementing alternative schools of opinion on teacher education, can have two effects: (1) directly affect professional development of teacher competencies; and also (2) indirectly influence the improvement of educational practice. This separate type of teacher competence can be an important factor in teachers' professional development, but also a significant component of the quality of the educational process that is realized in schools. The metalevel of professional development of teachers, if regarded as a known and recognized concept to be used in professional education of teachers (both pre-service and in-service), could also have certain effects on teacher personal development lying at the basis of professional development: satisfying the need for belonging and recognition-awareness of teachers that they are an important part of their community and that their activities have a purpose and meaningdeveloping internal motivation and a positive attitude towards the profession, developing self-confidence and a feeling of being professionally autonomous and able to predict the consequences of their own decisions and to critically evaluate and self-evaluate their own work, and also to constructively participate in the processes of joint evaluation with other stakeholders of teachers' professional development. This approach to professional competencies and teachers' professional development needs to be empirically verified so that its possible contributions in authentic (diverse) educational contexts can be determined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信