球椅在一年级课堂教学中的使用效果

Alexia E. Metz, Michelle DeMarco, A. Khalsa, Natalie Kreuz, Rebecca Stock, Alicia Westfall
{"title":"球椅在一年级课堂教学中的使用效果","authors":"Alexia E. Metz, Michelle DeMarco, A. Khalsa, Natalie Kreuz, Rebecca Stock, Alicia Westfall","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2020.1768999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Seating that allows movement is commonly suggested to enhance postural activation, attention, and behavior. The study examined the effects of ball chair seating on legibility, student behavior, and classroom productivity. In two consecutive years, in an ABAB design, first grade students alternated by weeks between standard seating (A phases) and ball chairs (B phases) during math class. Parents provided informed consent for student to be included in analysis (11/16 Year 1; 19/25 Year 2). There were significant decreases in legibility across the phases of this study (p <.001). Time in Seat was greater in each of the B phases compared to the first A phase (p <.001). There were no significant differences in the proportion of instructions followed (p =.564). There were differences in undesired behaviors: each switch to ball chairs was accompanied by a nonsignificant decrease in undesired behaviors, but the increase in undesired behaviors switching back to standard chairs was significant (p =.004). There was no difference in the proportion of time spent productively (p =.723). The effect on legibility suggests that if the desired outcome is improved legibility, using ball chairs may not serve as an effective intervention. The effects on behavior suggest that implementing a classroom-wide alternative seating intervention may have moderate, reversible positive effect. The effect on productivity suggests that ball chairs do not disrupt, nor enhance, classroom efficiency.","PeriodicalId":92676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","volume":"48 1","pages":"395 - 409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Ball Chair Seating during an Instructional Period in First Grade Classrooms\",\"authors\":\"Alexia E. Metz, Michelle DeMarco, A. Khalsa, Natalie Kreuz, Rebecca Stock, Alicia Westfall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19411243.2020.1768999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Seating that allows movement is commonly suggested to enhance postural activation, attention, and behavior. The study examined the effects of ball chair seating on legibility, student behavior, and classroom productivity. In two consecutive years, in an ABAB design, first grade students alternated by weeks between standard seating (A phases) and ball chairs (B phases) during math class. Parents provided informed consent for student to be included in analysis (11/16 Year 1; 19/25 Year 2). There were significant decreases in legibility across the phases of this study (p <.001). Time in Seat was greater in each of the B phases compared to the first A phase (p <.001). There were no significant differences in the proportion of instructions followed (p =.564). There were differences in undesired behaviors: each switch to ball chairs was accompanied by a nonsignificant decrease in undesired behaviors, but the increase in undesired behaviors switching back to standard chairs was significant (p =.004). There was no difference in the proportion of time spent productively (p =.723). The effect on legibility suggests that if the desired outcome is improved legibility, using ball chairs may not serve as an effective intervention. The effects on behavior suggest that implementing a classroom-wide alternative seating intervention may have moderate, reversible positive effect. The effect on productivity suggests that ball chairs do not disrupt, nor enhance, classroom efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"395 - 409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2020.1768999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2020.1768999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

允许活动的座位通常被建议用于增强姿势激活、注意力和行为。该研究考察了球椅对易读性、学生行为和课堂效率的影响。在连续两年的ABAB设计中,一年级学生在数学课上每隔几周在标准座位(A阶段)和球椅(B阶段)之间交替。家长为参与分析的学生提供知情同意(11/16年级;19/25年第2年)。在本研究的各个阶段,易读性显著下降(p < 0.001)。与第一个A阶段相比,每个B阶段的坐位时间都更长(p < 0.001)。遵循指令的比例无显著差异(p =.564)。不希望的行为存在差异:每次切换到球椅时,不希望的行为都伴随着不显著的减少,但切换回标准椅子时,不希望的行为增加是显著的(p = 0.004)。在生产性花费的时间比例上没有差异(p =.723)。对易读性的影响表明,如果期望的结果是提高易读性,使用球椅可能不是有效的干预措施。对行为的影响表明,实施班级范围内的替代座位干预可能具有适度的,可逆的积极影响。对生产力的影响表明,球椅既不会破坏也不会提高课堂效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Ball Chair Seating during an Instructional Period in First Grade Classrooms
ABSTRACT Seating that allows movement is commonly suggested to enhance postural activation, attention, and behavior. The study examined the effects of ball chair seating on legibility, student behavior, and classroom productivity. In two consecutive years, in an ABAB design, first grade students alternated by weeks between standard seating (A phases) and ball chairs (B phases) during math class. Parents provided informed consent for student to be included in analysis (11/16 Year 1; 19/25 Year 2). There were significant decreases in legibility across the phases of this study (p <.001). Time in Seat was greater in each of the B phases compared to the first A phase (p <.001). There were no significant differences in the proportion of instructions followed (p =.564). There were differences in undesired behaviors: each switch to ball chairs was accompanied by a nonsignificant decrease in undesired behaviors, but the increase in undesired behaviors switching back to standard chairs was significant (p =.004). There was no difference in the proportion of time spent productively (p =.723). The effect on legibility suggests that if the desired outcome is improved legibility, using ball chairs may not serve as an effective intervention. The effects on behavior suggest that implementing a classroom-wide alternative seating intervention may have moderate, reversible positive effect. The effect on productivity suggests that ball chairs do not disrupt, nor enhance, classroom efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信