一个由项目反应理论校准的评估头颈癌知识的工具

Wanilda Maria Meire Costa Borghi, Marco Aurélio Borella Rodrigues, É. Biasoli, M. Sundefeld, D. Andrade
{"title":"一个由项目反应理论校准的评估头颈癌知识的工具","authors":"Wanilda Maria Meire Costa Borghi, Marco Aurélio Borella Rodrigues, É. Biasoli, M. Sundefeld, D. Andrade","doi":"10.4322/ahns.2019.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Head and neck tumors are in the 9º place among the most frequent cancers in the world, being the incidence of 700,000 new cases per year. To suspect and to diagnose early the cancer implies to know well the subject. The questionnaire is a good instrument for measuring knowledge. Objective: To provide an item bank, calibrated by the Item Response Theory (IRT), to evaluate the “knowledge about head and neck cancer”, in any respondent, in order to benefit the studies on this construct, in the area of health education. Methods: To evaluate the “knowledge about head and neck cancer”, we started with a scale already calibrated by the IRT, with 24 items for schoolchildren (n = 2,006). A further 29 items of equal difficulty were created (n = 994 schoolchildren). Then, 60 new items, of equal construct and greater difficulty (n = 883 dentistry professionals) were incorporated into this scale. Results: The analysis of 2,847 responses resulted in a bank with 113 items on head and neck cancer calibrated by IRT and arranged on a skill scale. Conclusion: From this collection of items, different questionnaires can be set up according to the skill level of the respondent. The results of the evaluations, in single or distinct moments, can be compared since the items are on the same scale of ability.","PeriodicalId":8285,"journal":{"name":"Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An instrument calibrated by Item Response Theory to assess knowledge about head and neck cancer\",\"authors\":\"Wanilda Maria Meire Costa Borghi, Marco Aurélio Borella Rodrigues, É. Biasoli, M. Sundefeld, D. Andrade\",\"doi\":\"10.4322/ahns.2019.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Head and neck tumors are in the 9º place among the most frequent cancers in the world, being the incidence of 700,000 new cases per year. To suspect and to diagnose early the cancer implies to know well the subject. The questionnaire is a good instrument for measuring knowledge. Objective: To provide an item bank, calibrated by the Item Response Theory (IRT), to evaluate the “knowledge about head and neck cancer”, in any respondent, in order to benefit the studies on this construct, in the area of health education. Methods: To evaluate the “knowledge about head and neck cancer”, we started with a scale already calibrated by the IRT, with 24 items for schoolchildren (n = 2,006). A further 29 items of equal difficulty were created (n = 994 schoolchildren). Then, 60 new items, of equal construct and greater difficulty (n = 883 dentistry professionals) were incorporated into this scale. Results: The analysis of 2,847 responses resulted in a bank with 113 items on head and neck cancer calibrated by IRT and arranged on a skill scale. Conclusion: From this collection of items, different questionnaires can be set up according to the skill level of the respondent. The results of the evaluations, in single or distinct moments, can be compared since the items are on the same scale of ability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4322/ahns.2019.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/ahns.2019.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

头颈部肿瘤是世界上最常见的癌症之一,每年有70万例新发病例。要及早怀疑和诊断癌症,就必须对病人了如指掌。问卷是一种很好的测量知识的工具。目的:建立一个以项目反应理论(IRT)为标准的题库,对被调查者的“头颈癌知识”进行评估,以促进这一结构在健康教育领域的研究。方法:为了评估“头颈癌知识”,我们从IRT已经校准的量表开始,其中包括24个项目的学童(n = 2006)。另外还设计了29个难度相等的题目(n = 994名学童)。然后,将60个结构相同、难度较大的新题(883名牙科专业人员)纳入该量表。结果:对2847份回复的分析得出了一个包含113个头颈癌项目的信息库,这些项目由IRT校准并按技能量表排列。结论:从这个项目集合中,可以根据被调查者的技能水平设置不同的问卷。评估的结果,在单一或不同的时刻,可以比较,因为项目是在相同的能力尺度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An instrument calibrated by Item Response Theory to assess knowledge about head and neck cancer
Introduction: Head and neck tumors are in the 9º place among the most frequent cancers in the world, being the incidence of 700,000 new cases per year. To suspect and to diagnose early the cancer implies to know well the subject. The questionnaire is a good instrument for measuring knowledge. Objective: To provide an item bank, calibrated by the Item Response Theory (IRT), to evaluate the “knowledge about head and neck cancer”, in any respondent, in order to benefit the studies on this construct, in the area of health education. Methods: To evaluate the “knowledge about head and neck cancer”, we started with a scale already calibrated by the IRT, with 24 items for schoolchildren (n = 2,006). A further 29 items of equal difficulty were created (n = 994 schoolchildren). Then, 60 new items, of equal construct and greater difficulty (n = 883 dentistry professionals) were incorporated into this scale. Results: The analysis of 2,847 responses resulted in a bank with 113 items on head and neck cancer calibrated by IRT and arranged on a skill scale. Conclusion: From this collection of items, different questionnaires can be set up according to the skill level of the respondent. The results of the evaluations, in single or distinct moments, can be compared since the items are on the same scale of ability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信