小学课堂社会学习的时间优先顺序分析

Paul G. Fitchett, T. Heafner, Phillip J. VanFossen
{"title":"小学课堂社会学习的时间优先顺序分析","authors":"Paul G. Fitchett, T. Heafner, Phillip J. VanFossen","doi":"10.3776/JOCI.%Y.V8I2P7-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Time is an essential component of instructional decision-making and subject area prioritization.  The greater the amount of instructional time teachers allocate toward a specific subject the greater the content exposure and opportunity to engage learners.  Evidence suggests that social studies receives short shrift in the elementary schools resulting in the undermining of opportunities to learn the subject in meaningful ways.  Using survey data from 2,336 elementary social studies teachers, we examined relationships among the professional attitudes and instructional decision-making of elementary school teachers on reported social studies instructional time.  Results from analyses indicated that teachers who used discipline-specific methods, integrated within English Language Arts, and who reported being satisfied with teaching social studies spent significantly increased time on social studies.  Moreover, teachers who reported more frequent social studies content integration or who reported having a mandated test spent more time on discipline-specific strategies than teachers who did not.  Findings have implications for teacher educators preparing elementary practitioners, school leaders accommodating the field, and policymakers attempting to position social studies within an era of accountability.","PeriodicalId":31424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction","volume":"46 1","pages":"7-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of Time Prioritization for Social Studies in Elementary School Classrooms\",\"authors\":\"Paul G. Fitchett, T. Heafner, Phillip J. VanFossen\",\"doi\":\"10.3776/JOCI.%Y.V8I2P7-35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Time is an essential component of instructional decision-making and subject area prioritization.  The greater the amount of instructional time teachers allocate toward a specific subject the greater the content exposure and opportunity to engage learners.  Evidence suggests that social studies receives short shrift in the elementary schools resulting in the undermining of opportunities to learn the subject in meaningful ways.  Using survey data from 2,336 elementary social studies teachers, we examined relationships among the professional attitudes and instructional decision-making of elementary school teachers on reported social studies instructional time.  Results from analyses indicated that teachers who used discipline-specific methods, integrated within English Language Arts, and who reported being satisfied with teaching social studies spent significantly increased time on social studies.  Moreover, teachers who reported more frequent social studies content integration or who reported having a mandated test spent more time on discipline-specific strategies than teachers who did not.  Findings have implications for teacher educators preparing elementary practitioners, school leaders accommodating the field, and policymakers attempting to position social studies within an era of accountability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"7-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3776/JOCI.%Y.V8I2P7-35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3776/JOCI.%Y.V8I2P7-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

时间是教学决策和学科领域优先排序的重要组成部分。教师分配给特定科目的教学时间越多,内容暴露和吸引学习者的机会就越多。有证据表明,社会研究在小学受到冷落,从而破坏了以有意义的方式学习这门学科的机会。本研究以2,336名小学社会学科教师为调查对象,探讨了小学社会学科教师专业态度与教学决策之间的关系。分析结果表明,使用学科特定方法并与英语语言艺术相结合的教师,以及报告对社会研究教学感到满意的教师,在社会研究上花费的时间显着增加。此外,报告更频繁地整合社会研究内容或报告有强制性测试的教师比没有的教师花更多的时间在学科特定策略上。研究结果对准备初级从业人员的教师教育工作者、适应该领域的学校领导以及试图在问责制时代定位社会研究的政策制定者具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Analysis of Time Prioritization for Social Studies in Elementary School Classrooms
Time is an essential component of instructional decision-making and subject area prioritization.  The greater the amount of instructional time teachers allocate toward a specific subject the greater the content exposure and opportunity to engage learners.  Evidence suggests that social studies receives short shrift in the elementary schools resulting in the undermining of opportunities to learn the subject in meaningful ways.  Using survey data from 2,336 elementary social studies teachers, we examined relationships among the professional attitudes and instructional decision-making of elementary school teachers on reported social studies instructional time.  Results from analyses indicated that teachers who used discipline-specific methods, integrated within English Language Arts, and who reported being satisfied with teaching social studies spent significantly increased time on social studies.  Moreover, teachers who reported more frequent social studies content integration or who reported having a mandated test spent more time on discipline-specific strategies than teachers who did not.  Findings have implications for teacher educators preparing elementary practitioners, school leaders accommodating the field, and policymakers attempting to position social studies within an era of accountability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信