{"title":"民间想象的模式:绘制不可展示的照片","authors":"J. Boyd","doi":"10.1386/DRTP.4.1.145_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seeking out the patterns of constituent violence, in order that these patterns might be understood and reordered, lies at the heart of Ariella Azoulay’s discursive project, the ‘Unshowable Photographs: Different Ways Not to Say Deportation’ (2012). \nThe photographs in question capture scenes from the mass movement of Palestinians after the establishment of the state of Israel. In response to archival restrictions, she enacts an apparently simple gesture, that of making drawings of these ‘unshowable’ photographs. The resulting works operate to reposition the viewer as an active interpreter, suggesting a practice that is both aesthetic and political. These terms are examined for their ability to cast light on Azoulay’s key concepts of civil imagination and the civic gaze. \nHer critique of the archive is also considered, particularly archival mechanisms for setting and repeating divisive, diachronic patterns whose impacts are not contained in the past but continue to work on the present. However the archive can also be a generative source of potential histories, occluded patterns of life and possibilities that were suppressed or overlooked. \nAzoulay approaches photography as an event that is ongoing and multiple, renewed in each encounter with a viewer. The drawings, as a form of graphic witnessing, intensify the ethical relation to the image. I will argue that the act of drawing seeks to bind rather than separate, bringing us in to a relation with the image that the photograph could not. From here it is possible to glimpse the emergence of a civil imaginary that resists familiar aesthetic and political categories, one that obliges viewers to reconsider their agency as citizens. Recognising this, new patterns of being-with others may become possible.","PeriodicalId":36057,"journal":{"name":"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of civil imagination: Drawing the Unshowable Photographs\",\"authors\":\"J. Boyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/DRTP.4.1.145_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Seeking out the patterns of constituent violence, in order that these patterns might be understood and reordered, lies at the heart of Ariella Azoulay’s discursive project, the ‘Unshowable Photographs: Different Ways Not to Say Deportation’ (2012). \\nThe photographs in question capture scenes from the mass movement of Palestinians after the establishment of the state of Israel. In response to archival restrictions, she enacts an apparently simple gesture, that of making drawings of these ‘unshowable’ photographs. The resulting works operate to reposition the viewer as an active interpreter, suggesting a practice that is both aesthetic and political. These terms are examined for their ability to cast light on Azoulay’s key concepts of civil imagination and the civic gaze. \\nHer critique of the archive is also considered, particularly archival mechanisms for setting and repeating divisive, diachronic patterns whose impacts are not contained in the past but continue to work on the present. However the archive can also be a generative source of potential histories, occluded patterns of life and possibilities that were suppressed or overlooked. \\nAzoulay approaches photography as an event that is ongoing and multiple, renewed in each encounter with a viewer. The drawings, as a form of graphic witnessing, intensify the ethical relation to the image. I will argue that the act of drawing seeks to bind rather than separate, bringing us in to a relation with the image that the photograph could not. From here it is possible to glimpse the emergence of a civil imaginary that resists familiar aesthetic and political categories, one that obliges viewers to reconsider their agency as citizens. Recognising this, new patterns of being-with others may become possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/DRTP.4.1.145_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/DRTP.4.1.145_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patterns of civil imagination: Drawing the Unshowable Photographs
Seeking out the patterns of constituent violence, in order that these patterns might be understood and reordered, lies at the heart of Ariella Azoulay’s discursive project, the ‘Unshowable Photographs: Different Ways Not to Say Deportation’ (2012).
The photographs in question capture scenes from the mass movement of Palestinians after the establishment of the state of Israel. In response to archival restrictions, she enacts an apparently simple gesture, that of making drawings of these ‘unshowable’ photographs. The resulting works operate to reposition the viewer as an active interpreter, suggesting a practice that is both aesthetic and political. These terms are examined for their ability to cast light on Azoulay’s key concepts of civil imagination and the civic gaze.
Her critique of the archive is also considered, particularly archival mechanisms for setting and repeating divisive, diachronic patterns whose impacts are not contained in the past but continue to work on the present. However the archive can also be a generative source of potential histories, occluded patterns of life and possibilities that were suppressed or overlooked.
Azoulay approaches photography as an event that is ongoing and multiple, renewed in each encounter with a viewer. The drawings, as a form of graphic witnessing, intensify the ethical relation to the image. I will argue that the act of drawing seeks to bind rather than separate, bringing us in to a relation with the image that the photograph could not. From here it is possible to glimpse the emergence of a civil imaginary that resists familiar aesthetic and political categories, one that obliges viewers to reconsider their agency as citizens. Recognising this, new patterns of being-with others may become possible.