使用药物警戒数据库和工具比较阿托莫西汀和利地胺他明的安全性

Mohammed Aboukaoud
{"title":"使用药物警戒数据库和工具比较阿托莫西汀和利地胺他明的安全性","authors":"Mohammed Aboukaoud","doi":"10.35248/2329-6887.21.9.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Our study is the first to utilize the OpenVigil 2.1, a universal novel web-based pharmacovigilance analysis tool to analyze real-life safety of ADHD medications with special emphasis on newer medications and psychiatric adverse events. Thorough knowledge of adverse events for each medication reveals safety signals and support treatment guidelines and clinical management of the events. Methods we analyzed adverse event cases documented in the OpenVigil 2.1 from mid-2003 until February 2020. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA browser English version 20.0) was used to group lower level terms with a common preferred term to be searched for in the database. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and the reporting odd ratio (ROR) were used to quantitate the strength of the association between reported adverse events for atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, amphetamine, methylphenidate (instant release, intermediate acting, long acting). Results During the period we evaluated a total of 38,412 cases reported for methylphenidate, atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, amphetamine. We found a significantly lower risk for depressed mood (ROR 0.026, 95%CI 0.016-0.042) and tics (ROR 0.48, 95%CI 0.30-0.76) reported for atomoxetine compared with methylphenidate. Lisdexamphetamine did not seem to decrease the risk of psychiatric events. On the contrary, lisdexamfetamine carried a six fold risk for suicidal adverse events compared with other drugs in the data and a twofold risk of suicidal adverse events and tics compared with methylphenidate. Conclusions we conclude that Atomoxetine is a good choice for patients with comorbid tics or depression or for patients who develop depressed mood on stimulants. There is a great overlap between ADHD symptoms and stimulant/non stimulant adverse events, therefore prior to medication switch, therapeutic response should be evaluated carefully. Data in the literature on lisdexamfetamine remains scarce. Owing to signals on tic disorders and suicidal adverse events, we highly recommend studying these issues further with RCT and Cohort studies.","PeriodicalId":16958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety Comparison of Atomextine and Lisdexamfetamine: Using Pharmacovigilance Database and Tools\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Aboukaoud\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2329-6887.21.9.315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Our study is the first to utilize the OpenVigil 2.1, a universal novel web-based pharmacovigilance analysis tool to analyze real-life safety of ADHD medications with special emphasis on newer medications and psychiatric adverse events. Thorough knowledge of adverse events for each medication reveals safety signals and support treatment guidelines and clinical management of the events. Methods we analyzed adverse event cases documented in the OpenVigil 2.1 from mid-2003 until February 2020. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA browser English version 20.0) was used to group lower level terms with a common preferred term to be searched for in the database. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and the reporting odd ratio (ROR) were used to quantitate the strength of the association between reported adverse events for atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, amphetamine, methylphenidate (instant release, intermediate acting, long acting). Results During the period we evaluated a total of 38,412 cases reported for methylphenidate, atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, amphetamine. We found a significantly lower risk for depressed mood (ROR 0.026, 95%CI 0.016-0.042) and tics (ROR 0.48, 95%CI 0.30-0.76) reported for atomoxetine compared with methylphenidate. Lisdexamphetamine did not seem to decrease the risk of psychiatric events. On the contrary, lisdexamfetamine carried a six fold risk for suicidal adverse events compared with other drugs in the data and a twofold risk of suicidal adverse events and tics compared with methylphenidate. Conclusions we conclude that Atomoxetine is a good choice for patients with comorbid tics or depression or for patients who develop depressed mood on stimulants. There is a great overlap between ADHD symptoms and stimulant/non stimulant adverse events, therefore prior to medication switch, therapeutic response should be evaluated carefully. Data in the literature on lisdexamfetamine remains scarce. Owing to signals on tic disorders and suicidal adverse events, we highly recommend studying these issues further with RCT and Cohort studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacovigilance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacovigilance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2329-6887.21.9.315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2329-6887.21.9.315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究首次使用OpenVigil 2.1,这是一种通用的新型基于网络的药物警戒分析工具,用于分析ADHD药物的现实安全性,特别强调新药物和精神不良事件。全面了解每种药物的不良事件,揭示安全信号,支持治疗指南和事件的临床管理。方法:我们分析了OpenVigil 2.1从2003年中期到2020年2月记录的不良事件病例。使用监管活动医学词典(MedDRA浏览器英文版20.0)将较低级别的术语与要在数据库中搜索的通用首选术语进行分组。采用比例报告比(PRR)和报告奇比(ROR)来量化阿托莫西汀、利地安非他明、安非他明、哌甲酯(即释、中效、长效)不良事件报告之间的关联强度。结果在此期间,我们共评估了38,412例报告的哌醋甲酯、阿托西汀、利地安非他明、安非他明。我们发现,与哌醋甲酯相比,托莫西汀的抑郁情绪(ROR 0.026, 95%CI 0.016-0.042)和抽搐(ROR 0.48, 95%CI 0.30-0.76)的风险显著降低。利地安非他明似乎并没有降低精神事件的风险。相反,与数据中的其他药物相比,利地安非他明的自杀不良事件风险是6倍,自杀不良事件和抽搐的风险是哌醋甲酯的2倍。结论托莫西汀对于伴发抽搐或抑郁的患者或服用兴奋剂后出现抑郁情绪的患者是一个很好的选择。ADHD症状与兴奋剂/非兴奋剂不良事件之间有很大的重叠,因此在药物转换之前,应仔细评估治疗反应。关于利地安非他明的文献资料仍然很少。由于抽动障碍和自杀不良事件的信号,我们强烈建议通过RCT和队列研究进一步研究这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety Comparison of Atomextine and Lisdexamfetamine: Using Pharmacovigilance Database and Tools
Background Our study is the first to utilize the OpenVigil 2.1, a universal novel web-based pharmacovigilance analysis tool to analyze real-life safety of ADHD medications with special emphasis on newer medications and psychiatric adverse events. Thorough knowledge of adverse events for each medication reveals safety signals and support treatment guidelines and clinical management of the events. Methods we analyzed adverse event cases documented in the OpenVigil 2.1 from mid-2003 until February 2020. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA browser English version 20.0) was used to group lower level terms with a common preferred term to be searched for in the database. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and the reporting odd ratio (ROR) were used to quantitate the strength of the association between reported adverse events for atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, amphetamine, methylphenidate (instant release, intermediate acting, long acting). Results During the period we evaluated a total of 38,412 cases reported for methylphenidate, atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, amphetamine. We found a significantly lower risk for depressed mood (ROR 0.026, 95%CI 0.016-0.042) and tics (ROR 0.48, 95%CI 0.30-0.76) reported for atomoxetine compared with methylphenidate. Lisdexamphetamine did not seem to decrease the risk of psychiatric events. On the contrary, lisdexamfetamine carried a six fold risk for suicidal adverse events compared with other drugs in the data and a twofold risk of suicidal adverse events and tics compared with methylphenidate. Conclusions we conclude that Atomoxetine is a good choice for patients with comorbid tics or depression or for patients who develop depressed mood on stimulants. There is a great overlap between ADHD symptoms and stimulant/non stimulant adverse events, therefore prior to medication switch, therapeutic response should be evaluated carefully. Data in the literature on lisdexamfetamine remains scarce. Owing to signals on tic disorders and suicidal adverse events, we highly recommend studying these issues further with RCT and Cohort studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信