一组元间逻辑

Q1 Arts and Humanities
F. Pailos
{"title":"一组元间逻辑","authors":"F. Pailos","doi":"10.1080/11663081.2018.1534486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We will present 12 different mixed metainferential consequence relations. Each one of them is specified using two different inferential Tarskian or non-Tarskian consequence relations: or . We will show that it is possible to obtain a Tarskian logic with non-Tarskian inferential logics, but also a non-Tarskian logic with Tarskian inferential logics. Moreover, we will show how some of these metainferential logics work better than the corresponding inferential rivals. Finally, we will show how these logics prove that it is not enough to work with inferences as pairs of sets of formulas to obtain a contractive logic.","PeriodicalId":38573,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics","volume":"24 1","pages":"120 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A family of metainferential logics\",\"authors\":\"F. Pailos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11663081.2018.1534486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We will present 12 different mixed metainferential consequence relations. Each one of them is specified using two different inferential Tarskian or non-Tarskian consequence relations: or . We will show that it is possible to obtain a Tarskian logic with non-Tarskian inferential logics, but also a non-Tarskian logic with Tarskian inferential logics. Moreover, we will show how some of these metainferential logics work better than the corresponding inferential rivals. Finally, we will show how these logics prove that it is not enough to work with inferences as pairs of sets of formulas to obtain a contractive logic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"120 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2018.1534486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2018.1534486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

摘要本文将给出12种不同的混合介子推理关系。它们中的每一个都使用两个不同的推理塔斯基推理关系或非塔斯基推理关系来指定:或。我们将证明可以用非塔斯基推理逻辑得到一个塔斯基逻辑,也可以用塔斯基推理逻辑得到一个非塔斯基逻辑。此外,我们将展示其中一些元干扰逻辑如何比相应的推理对手更好地工作。最后,我们将展示这些逻辑如何证明将推理作为公式集对来获得压缩逻辑是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A family of metainferential logics
ABSTRACT We will present 12 different mixed metainferential consequence relations. Each one of them is specified using two different inferential Tarskian or non-Tarskian consequence relations: or . We will show that it is possible to obtain a Tarskian logic with non-Tarskian inferential logics, but also a non-Tarskian logic with Tarskian inferential logics. Moreover, we will show how some of these metainferential logics work better than the corresponding inferential rivals. Finally, we will show how these logics prove that it is not enough to work with inferences as pairs of sets of formulas to obtain a contractive logic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信