眼球考古学:鲁迅、挖眼神话与眼球解剖学

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Tim Shao-Hung Teng
{"title":"眼球考古学:鲁迅、挖眼神话与眼球解剖学","authors":"Tim Shao-Hung Teng","doi":"10.1215/10679847-10441247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article situates Lu Xun at the intersection of late-Qing folkloric discourse and medical science by studying his 1925 essay \"Lun zhaoxiang zhilei\" (\"On Photography\"). \"On Photography\" is a rich yet enigmatic piece of writing that has yet to receive critical attention on its own terms in the scholarship of either Lu Xun or Chinese visual culture. Lu Xun's essay includes a folklore account of \"foreign devils\" plucking out locals' eyes and pickling them in a jar. Bracketing the magic lantern incident held by many as the primal scene of modern Chinese literature, this article suggests that Lu Xun's account of the eyeball offers a no less significant example of how an alternate optical device can be employed to reflect China's encounter with colonial modernity. Adopting the method of media archaeology, this article argues that Lu Xun's essay holds the key to tracing a genealogy of the eyeball from its embedment in feudal superstition to its embodiment of anti-missionary sentiments, from figurative representation in Chinese medical classics to physiological simulation in anatomical treatises, and from anatomical visualization to optical abstraction and modulation. This genealogy constructs the eye as a historically valid subject that morphs from the eye to the eyeball and then to the eye again, a genealogy that is revealing of how China grappled through a crucial period of political, cultural, and scientific sea changes.","PeriodicalId":44356,"journal":{"name":"Positions-Asia Critique","volume":"2 1","pages":"541 - 570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Archaeology of the Eyeball: Lu Xun, Eye-Gouging Myth, and Ocular Anatomy\",\"authors\":\"Tim Shao-Hung Teng\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/10679847-10441247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article situates Lu Xun at the intersection of late-Qing folkloric discourse and medical science by studying his 1925 essay \\\"Lun zhaoxiang zhilei\\\" (\\\"On Photography\\\"). \\\"On Photography\\\" is a rich yet enigmatic piece of writing that has yet to receive critical attention on its own terms in the scholarship of either Lu Xun or Chinese visual culture. Lu Xun's essay includes a folklore account of \\\"foreign devils\\\" plucking out locals' eyes and pickling them in a jar. Bracketing the magic lantern incident held by many as the primal scene of modern Chinese literature, this article suggests that Lu Xun's account of the eyeball offers a no less significant example of how an alternate optical device can be employed to reflect China's encounter with colonial modernity. Adopting the method of media archaeology, this article argues that Lu Xun's essay holds the key to tracing a genealogy of the eyeball from its embedment in feudal superstition to its embodiment of anti-missionary sentiments, from figurative representation in Chinese medical classics to physiological simulation in anatomical treatises, and from anatomical visualization to optical abstraction and modulation. This genealogy constructs the eye as a historically valid subject that morphs from the eye to the eyeball and then to the eye again, a genealogy that is revealing of how China grappled through a crucial period of political, cultural, and scientific sea changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Positions-Asia Critique\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"541 - 570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Positions-Asia Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-10441247\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positions-Asia Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-10441247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文以鲁迅1925年的随笔《论摄影》为研究对象,将他置于晚清民俗话语与医学的交汇点。《论摄影》是一篇内容丰富而又神秘的作品,在鲁迅或中国视觉文化的学术研究中,它还没有得到批评性的关注。鲁迅的文章中有一个民间传说,说“洋鬼子”把当地人的眼睛挖出来,放在罐子里腌制。这篇文章将被许多人视为中国现代文学的原始场景的神灯事件放在一起,认为鲁迅对眼球的描述提供了一个同样重要的例子,说明如何利用一种替代的光学装置来反映中国与殖民现代性的遭遇。本文采用媒介考古学的方法,认为鲁迅的文章是追溯眼球谱系的关键,从封建迷信的嵌入到反传教情绪的体现,从中医经典的具象再现到解剖论著的生理模拟,从解剖可视化到光学抽象和调制。这一谱系将眼睛构建为一个历史上有效的主题,从眼睛到眼球,然后再到眼睛,这一谱系揭示了中国如何在政治、文化和科学巨变的关键时期挣扎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Archaeology of the Eyeball: Lu Xun, Eye-Gouging Myth, and Ocular Anatomy
Abstract:This article situates Lu Xun at the intersection of late-Qing folkloric discourse and medical science by studying his 1925 essay "Lun zhaoxiang zhilei" ("On Photography"). "On Photography" is a rich yet enigmatic piece of writing that has yet to receive critical attention on its own terms in the scholarship of either Lu Xun or Chinese visual culture. Lu Xun's essay includes a folklore account of "foreign devils" plucking out locals' eyes and pickling them in a jar. Bracketing the magic lantern incident held by many as the primal scene of modern Chinese literature, this article suggests that Lu Xun's account of the eyeball offers a no less significant example of how an alternate optical device can be employed to reflect China's encounter with colonial modernity. Adopting the method of media archaeology, this article argues that Lu Xun's essay holds the key to tracing a genealogy of the eyeball from its embedment in feudal superstition to its embodiment of anti-missionary sentiments, from figurative representation in Chinese medical classics to physiological simulation in anatomical treatises, and from anatomical visualization to optical abstraction and modulation. This genealogy constructs the eye as a historically valid subject that morphs from the eye to the eyeball and then to the eye again, a genealogy that is revealing of how China grappled through a crucial period of political, cultural, and scientific sea changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Positions-Asia Critique
Positions-Asia Critique ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信