发展中国家常用麻醉镇痛药浪费审计:以埃塞俄比亚大学教学医院为例

H. Yimer, Salh Yalew
{"title":"发展中国家常用麻醉镇痛药浪费审计:以埃塞俄比亚大学教学医院为例","authors":"H. Yimer, Salh Yalew","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anaesthetic drug wastage is a common challenge encountered in current anaesthetic care. Drug wastage is a potential area that significantly contribute for unnecessary health care budget allocation and financial lose. The aim of this study was to assess the amount of anaesthetic drug wastage and to analyze the cost of wasted drug in four operation room. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from January 10 to January 26, 2017 in the threemajor surgical and one obstetric operation room of university of Gondar teaching hospital. During consecutive period, data on amount of drug used or discarded were collected on patients undergoing surgical procedures under general or spinal anaesthesia. The total cost of used and wasted drug was estimated. Result: Of 86 patients included in the study, 54.6% were operated under general anaesthesia and 31.4% were under spinal anaesthesia. From 18 commonly used anaesthetic drugs, 16 of drugs were included into the final analysis. Of 16 different anaesthetic drugs, the maximum amount of wastage after loaded in syringes but not used, partially unused in ampoules or vials per case basis were seen in propofol, tramadol, and diclofenac (23.72 mg, 18 mg, and 10.6 mg, respectively). A total of 1967.8 Ethiopian birr (89.44 USD) were the cost of wasted drugs, of these the cost of wasted bupivacaine was maximum (33.8%). Conclusion: There was a significant amount of anaesthetic drugs and financial wastage during perioperative anaesthetic management for different surgical procedure. The use of drugs like neostigmine, metoclopramide, cimetidine and acetaminophen was best practice of usage during the study period no wastage was seen in those drugs. The use of fentanyl was also good which is 3.7% compared to other drugs.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audit on Wastage of Commonly Used Anaesthetic and Analgesic Agentsin Developing Country: The Case of Ethiopian University Teaching Hospital\",\"authors\":\"H. Yimer, Salh Yalew\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-6148.1000778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Anaesthetic drug wastage is a common challenge encountered in current anaesthetic care. Drug wastage is a potential area that significantly contribute for unnecessary health care budget allocation and financial lose. The aim of this study was to assess the amount of anaesthetic drug wastage and to analyze the cost of wasted drug in four operation room. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from January 10 to January 26, 2017 in the threemajor surgical and one obstetric operation room of university of Gondar teaching hospital. During consecutive period, data on amount of drug used or discarded were collected on patients undergoing surgical procedures under general or spinal anaesthesia. The total cost of used and wasted drug was estimated. Result: Of 86 patients included in the study, 54.6% were operated under general anaesthesia and 31.4% were under spinal anaesthesia. From 18 commonly used anaesthetic drugs, 16 of drugs were included into the final analysis. Of 16 different anaesthetic drugs, the maximum amount of wastage after loaded in syringes but not used, partially unused in ampoules or vials per case basis were seen in propofol, tramadol, and diclofenac (23.72 mg, 18 mg, and 10.6 mg, respectively). A total of 1967.8 Ethiopian birr (89.44 USD) were the cost of wasted drugs, of these the cost of wasted bupivacaine was maximum (33.8%). Conclusion: There was a significant amount of anaesthetic drugs and financial wastage during perioperative anaesthetic management for different surgical procedure. The use of drugs like neostigmine, metoclopramide, cimetidine and acetaminophen was best practice of usage during the study period no wastage was seen in those drugs. The use of fentanyl was also good which is 3.7% compared to other drugs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:麻醉药物浪费是当前麻醉护理中常见的问题。药物浪费是造成不必要的卫生保健预算分配和财政损失的一个潜在领域。本研究的目的是评估四家手术室麻醉药物的浪费情况,并分析浪费药物的成本。方法:于2017年1月10日至1月26日在贡达尔大学教学医院的3个大外科和1个产科手术室进行前瞻性观察研究。在连续期间,收集在全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉下接受外科手术的患者的药物使用量或丢弃量的数据。估计了使用和浪费药物的总成本。结果:本组86例患者中,全身麻醉占54.6%,脊髓麻醉占31.4%。从18种常用麻醉药物中,有16种纳入最终分析。在16种麻醉药物中,按病例计算,异丙酚、曲马多和双氯芬酸在装入注射器后未使用、部分未使用、安瓿或小瓶使用后的浪费量最大(分别为23.72 mg、18 mg和10.6 mg)。浪费药品成本为1967.8埃塞比尔(89.44美元),其中以布比卡因浪费成本最高(33.8%)。结论:不同手术方式围手术期麻醉管理存在较大的麻醉药物用量和资金浪费。在研究期间,新斯的明、甲氧氯普胺、西咪替丁和对乙酰氨基酚等药物的使用是最佳实践,没有发现这些药物的浪费。芬太尼的使用率也很好,与其他药物相比,芬太尼的使用率为3.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Audit on Wastage of Commonly Used Anaesthetic and Analgesic Agentsin Developing Country: The Case of Ethiopian University Teaching Hospital
Background: Anaesthetic drug wastage is a common challenge encountered in current anaesthetic care. Drug wastage is a potential area that significantly contribute for unnecessary health care budget allocation and financial lose. The aim of this study was to assess the amount of anaesthetic drug wastage and to analyze the cost of wasted drug in four operation room. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from January 10 to January 26, 2017 in the threemajor surgical and one obstetric operation room of university of Gondar teaching hospital. During consecutive period, data on amount of drug used or discarded were collected on patients undergoing surgical procedures under general or spinal anaesthesia. The total cost of used and wasted drug was estimated. Result: Of 86 patients included in the study, 54.6% were operated under general anaesthesia and 31.4% were under spinal anaesthesia. From 18 commonly used anaesthetic drugs, 16 of drugs were included into the final analysis. Of 16 different anaesthetic drugs, the maximum amount of wastage after loaded in syringes but not used, partially unused in ampoules or vials per case basis were seen in propofol, tramadol, and diclofenac (23.72 mg, 18 mg, and 10.6 mg, respectively). A total of 1967.8 Ethiopian birr (89.44 USD) were the cost of wasted drugs, of these the cost of wasted bupivacaine was maximum (33.8%). Conclusion: There was a significant amount of anaesthetic drugs and financial wastage during perioperative anaesthetic management for different surgical procedure. The use of drugs like neostigmine, metoclopramide, cimetidine and acetaminophen was best practice of usage during the study period no wastage was seen in those drugs. The use of fentanyl was also good which is 3.7% compared to other drugs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信