{"title":"中世纪圣徒传记中的跨性别和性别酷儿主题","authors":"Mathew Kuefler","doi":"10.1086/721870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this epilogue, I discuss the productivity of trans and genderqueer readings of medieval hagiography in three contexts: the development of hagiographical studies since the 1960s, of gender studies since Simone de Beauvoir’s seminal work Le deuxième sexe (1949-1950), and, finally, of historical studies, since the publication of Pierre Nora’s Les Lieux de mémoire (1984-1992). It should be clear that this afterword is not intended as anything like a final conclusion to this volume, claiming to neatly resolve all of the questions raised. Instead, it is an invitation to further explore gender and saints, to reflect on both categories as well as on methods of trans and genderqueer reading, and, finally, on the societal meaning of such studies today.","PeriodicalId":41850,"journal":{"name":"Early Modern Women-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\":Trans and Genderqueer Subjects in Medieval Hagiography\",\"authors\":\"Mathew Kuefler\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this epilogue, I discuss the productivity of trans and genderqueer readings of medieval hagiography in three contexts: the development of hagiographical studies since the 1960s, of gender studies since Simone de Beauvoir’s seminal work Le deuxième sexe (1949-1950), and, finally, of historical studies, since the publication of Pierre Nora’s Les Lieux de mémoire (1984-1992). It should be clear that this afterword is not intended as anything like a final conclusion to this volume, claiming to neatly resolve all of the questions raised. Instead, it is an invitation to further explore gender and saints, to reflect on both categories as well as on methods of trans and genderqueer reading, and, finally, on the societal meaning of such studies today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Modern Women-An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Modern Women-An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721870\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Modern Women-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721870","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇结语中,我将在三种情况下讨论中世纪圣徒传记的跨性别和性别异类解读的成效:自20世纪60年代以来圣徒传记研究的发展,自西蒙娜·德·波伏娃的开创性作品《Le deuxi sexe》(1949-1950)以来性别研究的发展,以及自皮埃尔·诺拉的《Les Lieux de msammoire》(1984-1992)出版以来历史研究的发展。应该清楚的是,这篇后记并不打算作为本卷的最后结论,声称要巧妙地解决所提出的所有问题。相反,它是一个邀请,让我们进一步探索性别和圣人,反思这两个类别,以及跨性别和性别酷儿阅读的方法,最后,思考这些研究在今天的社会意义。
:Trans and Genderqueer Subjects in Medieval Hagiography
In this epilogue, I discuss the productivity of trans and genderqueer readings of medieval hagiography in three contexts: the development of hagiographical studies since the 1960s, of gender studies since Simone de Beauvoir’s seminal work Le deuxième sexe (1949-1950), and, finally, of historical studies, since the publication of Pierre Nora’s Les Lieux de mémoire (1984-1992). It should be clear that this afterword is not intended as anything like a final conclusion to this volume, claiming to neatly resolve all of the questions raised. Instead, it is an invitation to further explore gender and saints, to reflect on both categories as well as on methods of trans and genderqueer reading, and, finally, on the societal meaning of such studies today.